taxman232ex
Posts: 149
Joined: 9/30/2003 From: East Coast, Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mike in DC quote:
ORIGINAL: LearningMan Maybe it's time for a new grass-roots ORGANIZATION by the people and not for the benefit of a buncha prima-donas egos. I don't want to discourage your enthusiasm, but I would really suggest a quick reality check. By "the people", I assume you are talking about the couple of dozen or so RCU members who regularly post in the AMA forum? Not really a very big group, and to my eyes, they seem to have a much higher prima-donna to individual ratio than certainly the AMA. On the one side, you have Dave Brown, the EC, and a bunch of other people who have decades in the sport and the experience and dedication and the proven ability to run a large association. Aligned with them, I'd guess, are hundreds of board members of AMA clubs. On the other side, you have 30 or so RCU members who can hardly post a dozen comments on a subject before they degenerate into name calling and insults. GOOD LUCK to you with your new organization! I agree that RCU represents a miniscule portion of actual AMA membership, but I have to ask exactly what DB and the EC's experience brings to the table. Does it take experience to ostrasize the SIGs that are on the cutting edge of the hobby? Like it or not, jets, helis, turbines, etc. bring a lot of new technologies to the forefront of the hobby and eventually it all trickles down to the average modeler. Composite airframes, digital servos with over 200 oz/in. of torque, lithium batteries, etc are all here as a result of the fringe striving and working for better products, yet DB seems hellbent on over regulating all of these areas. How does DB's pattern experience from the 70's translate to modelling in 2003? How does the EC's experience translate into understanding the true dangers with turbines? How does their business experience translate when they don't even seem to be able to negotiate decent insurance policies? Experience just for the sake of experience doesn't mean squat. Experience with proven results is what matters. Do the EC and DB even consider actual hard data when making decisions or is it all willy nilly and based on perceptions and emotions? I can tell you what my perception is. Why don't they address these issues. They have the perfect forums via RCU and MA to do so, but the only correspondence we get in MA is garbage regarding FF and control line. Why does a 170k membership association cater to paper and tissue modellers? That is my perception. Why won't DB come out of his ivory tower and address these issues - have some balls instead of woring behind the scenes and foaming at the mouth when his shills aka EC don't do what he wants. I have to say with all the things I despise about AMA, it would be quite a venture to replace it or offer a comparable organization. There are a lot of issues to address and I have a loose knit roadmap od what I feel needs to be done along with an organizational structure necessary to accomplish it. I can unveil my plan soon if anyone is actually interested. My one main stubling block is through what medium do you reach all of your possible members - how do you do that effectively - how do you convince them that your deal is better than AMA. Those questions need answers and resolution. It is something open to discussion. I can tell you one thing. It is going to be one of my primary goals in life to do away with DB;s AMA, and I will approach it in two ways. Unseat him from his throne or have a hand in a rival organization that has the foresight and management to crush whaty is now known as the AMA. Taxman
|