nmking09
Posts: 375
Joined: 10/14/2004 From: Champaign,
IL, USA Status: offline
|
While it is true that placing a note in the forum was a good idea, it would seem that after going 2 years without a reply someone would think of trying to notify the consumer in a different manner. Would a slip of paper in the servo box stating not to use locktite with these servos, that this servo is not recommended for high vibration environments, and that this servo is not recommended for use in aircraft over 12 pounds, without being ganged be too much to ask? In the mean time possibly notifying your distributors of this message would be a much appreciated action. I know that attempting to notify the consumer of information you believe that they should inherently be aware of sounds like an unnecessary action, but I will refer you to the case of the woman who sued Mc.Donalds because her coffee was hot. Unlike that case, it would be likely that a person purchasing a +150 in-oz servo would expect it capable of handling the environment that a 150 in-oz servo would be used in, as in an aileron servo on a gas aircraft. If this is an unacceptable application placing a simple warning on or in the box could possibly save someone their aircraft, hitec the finances of loosing another 10 customers, and would be a much needed positive step toward customer relations. Yes, locktite was most likely the failure mode of the servo. Seeing the date at which you placed the 10mm screws in the servos it is highly likely that this servo contained the 10mm screw. The manufacturers actually recommended the use of this particular servo with their aircraft. The fact that after over two years of complaints, this servo is still being produced without proper application data, is the real tragedy. Nmking09
_____________________________
Don't fly what you can't afford to buy two of !!!
|