C-130 updates  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Twin & Multi Engine RC Aircraft >> C-130 updates
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
C-130 updates - 11/25/2003 4:39:25 AM   
rryman


 

Posts: 971
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Status: offline
OK, I know there are more people on this thread than me building or flying a C-130. I haven't gotten any updates lately on any of them. How's the rest of you getting along with your ship? Jimmie bananas, C130nut, and jimcork, I know you're out there, lets hear about those birds. I'm getting along on mine, but unlike some of you, we have winter ahead of us yet, so I've got lots of time. I have decided on the AC-130A scheme for mine, and am presently collecting documentation on it. No particular reason, other than that will make it a warbird if I finish it like that, and the fact that I have an AC-47 already done in camo. (I think camo also hides a lot of flaws!) The only thing that is starting to concern me it that everyone that sees it says, "And it's supposed to fly with .25's??" MMMMMM!!!!!
Anybody got any updates?
Randy
       Post #: 1

RE: C-130 updates - 11/25/2003 11:26:34 AM   
Jimmy Bananas


 

Posts: 881
Joined: 12/30/2001
From: Urbandale, IA, USA
Status: offline
Randy:

Well mine is ready to paint,but will have to wait until next spring to do that..I live in an apartment,and it's hell trying to paint a plane in the winter time..Still looking for a good 5-view of it in camouflage colors (Vietnam Era)..Also have to order some new cowls..I switched engines..Going to use Mag's 36, 2 strokes...I think the beast will weight around 25 Ibs...I know Jim Cork mention he uses full flaps on his...Got to see how much full flaps is...Anyway..thats my story....

(in reply to rryman)
       Post #: 2

RE: C-130 updates - 11/25/2003 7:22:55 PM   
c130nut


 

Posts: 307
Joined: 9/9/2003
From: Madison, MS, USA
Status: offline
Well, progress has slowed due to ... well..... I bought an RC helicopter. I am still working on the C130, but really slow. I am going to mount the nacelles this week or next. Any pointers?

_____________________________

Billy Richardson, C130nut
Madison, MS

(in reply to Jimmy Bananas)
       Post #: 3

RE: C-130 updates - 11/25/2003 8:11:17 PM   
rryman


 

Posts: 971
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Status: offline
I am going to mount the nacelles this week or next. Any pointers?
========Yea, measure, measure, measure!! I did what I could to insure that I had mine aligned straight. The only other thing that comes to mind was mentioned on my plan reference about the size props you intend to use. The layout on my plan was for a specific size prop. I went ahead and spaced my nacelles just a little farther apart just in case.
Randy

(in reply to c130nut)
       Post #: 4

RE: C-130 updates - 11/25/2003 10:00:22 PM   
jimcork1



Posts: 951
Joined: 1/29/2002
From: Slidell, LA, USA
Status: offline
I have been on vacation,, traveling to the Carolinas. I did see a c130 in a hobby shop in Spartinburg and was told it only flew twice and crashed both times, so they just hang it.

Now for update on my herk,, I have adjusted the stab to lower the leading edge. I still have about 1/8" more to lower the leading edge. I have 19 flights on it. I have learned that on take off roll,, do not pull up elevator until the plane has accelerated close to flying speed. I held full up for the entire takeoff roll and the bird lifted with a gust of wind (15mph) and the #1 engine dropped about 1000 rpm.. It almost stalled and the left wing missed the ground by inches,, then of course the right wing dropped and it missed by inches. I pulled power back slightly to let the #1 richen up a bit and pull,, I also pushed down elevator, (gutsy move at 10') and flew a shallower than normal flight path until climb out was at safe altitude. I landed and richened #1 and all was well after this flight. I have done (at altitude) stalls. It stalls very gently by slowly dropping the nose and slightly off to the left.

Landing practice was found to have the best (smoothest) landings by flying 50% flaps and power off for final approach, then in the round out I ADD 2 clicks of power for about 1 second, then ease off the power and the plane flies to the wheels. You do not want to stall drop this bird in.

Glad to be back,, vettdvr.. PS photo is what I thought was my work car,, but my wife labeled the photo as.: "Mine"

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to rryman)
       Post #: 5

Nacell - 11/25/2003 10:07:18 PM   
jimcork1



Posts: 951
Joined: 1/29/2002
From: Slidell, LA, USA
Status: offline
I mounted the nacells by installing the engines on the firewalls and then using the crankshaft for the jig.
The jig was a shower door track very straight, I located the holes on the track, Installed all 4 engines with the prop nut and then turned the wing vertical. I then set the engines all 4 at one time on the wing. (the wing was marked with centerline markings). Once on the wing CA the nacells and remove the shower track. Then I epoxied them in place.

WARNING. I fly with 4 saito's .30's and it flies at 22+#'s very well. If you go to large engines you will have prop clearance issues. You must let your prop size dictate the engine size. If you use a 36 2 stroke you might have to use a 3 blade prob for prop tip clearance.

If I was doing it over again I would use the new Saito .40's vs the .30's. I would use a 10x7 or 8 prob vs the 10x6. My .30's turn 10,100 rpm and all engines were series produced and ordered that way. The max variation is from 9900 to 10,100 rpm. All 4 typically run (in sync" or at least very close to it. You can tell when the engines drop in,,, really cool sound. Guys at the field tell me it sounds like a flight of mad hornets when I do a fly by. Real cool flier though. Flight #19 was completed now about 150 minutes total air time.. Not too shabby for my first multi.. Jim

(in reply to jimcork1)
       Post #: 6

RE: Nacell - 11/26/2003 12:59:19 PM   
Jimmy Bananas


 

Posts: 881
Joined: 12/30/2001
From: Urbandale, IA, USA
Status: offline
Jim:

Ok on the 50 Degrees of flap on landing...How much do you use on takeoff?..Right now I have 10 degrees for takeoff and 20 degrees for landing...On the engine spacing for the nacelles,best to measure for 10" props...Mine were spaced for 9" props..Big mistake because I changed engines,so I needed bigger props. I can swing a 9.5 on the inter nacelles and a 10" on the outer nacelles..Had to reset 2 firewalls in order to obtain prop clearnce...One more question Jim,what is the advantage of 3 bladed props? I agree with you on the 4 stroke engines..If I could,would use Saito's 40- 4 strokes engines...nice package....thanx. again..

(in reply to jimcork1)
       Post #: 7

RE: Nacell - 11/26/2003 6:33:03 PM   
Tannerlb


 

Posts: 174
Joined: 9/25/2003
From: New York, NY,
Status: offline
do you have any pictures or you planes guys?

(in reply to Jimmy Bananas)
       Post #: 8

RE: Nacell - 11/27/2003 4:29:10 AM   
rryman


 

Posts: 971
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Status: offline
I hope to be able to lay some paint on mine in the next couple weeks, probably over the holidays. I have the wing, stab and control surfaces primed and ready, now working on the fuse with some details like gun ports, IR, LLTV stuff and the side looking radar domes. I'm also adding a RAM rotating beacon and landing lights to mine. I'm really hoping to keep it at about 17-18#. I guess we'll see.
Randy

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to Tannerlb)
       Post #: 9

RE: Nacell - 11/27/2003 9:11:28 AM   
Jimmy Bananas


 

Posts: 881
Joined: 12/30/2001
From: Urbandale, IA, USA
Status: offline
Randy;

Nice pic of your model..one question...do you have retracts, and if so,what is the distance from bottom of fuse to the top of your bench?....

(in reply to rryman)
       Post #: 10

RE: Nacell - 11/27/2003 1:48:57 PM   
rryman


 

Posts: 971
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Status: offline
Jimmie,
I did not put in retracts at this time. I did however, make allowances to do it just in case I want to in the future. I don't believe it would be difficult to make a set for this model. I put mine in a little different than the plans call for. I have the gear wire mounted ot a separate plate, which bolts to the box inside the plane which has slots in it to adjust he wheels up or down as necessary. I now have 1-1/2" clearance under the plane, which I think will be plenty, and maybe a little to much to look scale. Right now the nose is sitting a little high. Still need to do some adjustment on it. I have a spring arrangement on the nose gear so it moves up and down for a little shock absorbing ability. I'm working on making the gatling guns and the 40mm BOFORS out of K & S aluminum tubing. The radar domes on the side are tops off of deodorant spray that I found at Wal Mart.
Randy

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to Jimmy Bananas)
       Post #: 11

RE: Nacell - 11/28/2003 3:28:11 PM   
rryman


 

Posts: 971
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Status: offline
The transformation to a "Warbird" has begun. Finished up the guns last night. Had to temporarily put them on to see how they look. Probably went to a lot of trouble for this, since the sides of the fuse were gloss black and some of this probably won't be noticeable anyway.
Randy

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to rryman)
       Post #: 12

RE: Nacell - 11/29/2003 4:05:53 AM   
jimcork1



Posts: 951
Joined: 1/29/2002
From: Slidell, LA, USA
Status: offline
I am not big on 3 blade props because the 2 blade is more efficient. However if your engine spacing requires a larger prop than you planned, the 3 blade is an option. If you use a 10x6 prop and go to 3 blade,, start with 9x5 3 blade.

I noticed in the landing gear, you built it exactly like the "plan". I made that part removable. My Main gear bolts to the square box f/glassed to the fuse. belly. I used 6 4x40 socket head screws and blind nuts. This makes the plate removable for repairs/upgrades. The belly of your plane looks about the right height. Mine was lower and on grass that was a problem.

One small point,, I used 5/32 wire for the gear, and then put hardwood landing gear blocks over the struts to make the wheels more rigid. Prior to that the wires were bending on landings.

Flaps.. I use full flaps, (all I can put down) on take off. Let the plane roll and pick up speed with a neutral elevator. Then when it has speed give up elevator. I have to use full up elevator for take off and after lift off release some of the up pressure to level out the rate of climb. Takeoff's are very realistic. The nose will lift and the mains will stay planted. When flying speed is reached the mains will lift off. CAUTION, if you don't reduce the pressure on the elev (NOT PUSH DOWN) the plane will over rotate to a very steep climb angle of climb.

Landings are better with 1/2 flaps. (my full is about 45 degrees down and I only have 2 flaps / wing) I did not add the 3rd on the removable wing tip.

For landing,, I use 1/2 flaps and fly a steep almost power off glide path (vietman type approach) This way if an engine quits power is back and you can still make the landing. If your engines are really reliable and mine are, but I still fly steep you can fly a power on landing.

Now lets talk making the landing. Flaps 1/2, power almost to idle fly stable path until about 4 or so ft above the touchdown point. Then add 2 or so clicks of throttle. Once you have leveled off allow the plane to settle and as soon as the wheels touch power to idle AND FLAPS UP. The flaps up will prevent going airborne if you get a large gust of wind.

I am now doing touch and goes. At touch down I add full power then put the flaps down to full. Then add up elevator for lift off.

I now have 19 (8 minute) flights very successful. The first were shakey due to the elevator incident being too positive, but the plane is now very stable. In only 1 of the 19 flights did an engine quit due to bad fuel (new out of the jug). When the outboard engine quit the plane immediately turned to the dead engine. I mix ail to rudder. When the engine quit I added hard elevator (which also added the needed rudder) straightened the plane then flew the traffic pattern to steep final approach on 3 engines.

When you paint be sure to fill the pin holes. It is full of pin holes..

Good luck,, Jim

(in reply to rryman)