RE: My Rocket Plane  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> Unusual R/C >> RE: My Rocket Plane
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/7/2004 3:04:42 AM   
ozzie111


 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/9/2003
From: Waco, TX, USA
Status: offline
Hello,

I just found this thread. My name is Bryan Nelson. For lack of a better description, I was the
co-pilot of the X-30 seen on the Rocket Challenge on the Discovery channel. I say co-pilot
because as the pilot, Dave Schaefer reached appogee I was in charge of changing the controls to a glide configuration, and setting any needed trims. I also helped him with an extra set of eyes, and reminded him of airspeed and AOA etc. The X-30 was conceived and executed as a
team project. I helped with various aspects of design, and construction. It did seem to have a small wing area, as it is truly a lifting body. It generates a great deal of lift by nature of its
fuselage design. It appeared as a handful on the show due to some technical problems with
the Hybrid motor ground support equipment. We achieved about 50% of the altitude that we
had hoped for. As a result of the decrease in performance we were low, slow and short on final.
If you remember, the landing area was less than ideal, and there were some obsatcles we had to fly around to land safely. I am no expert on rocket gliders, but have a fair amount of experience with them. I have constructed several, as well as converted some ARFs to rocket gliders.
I would love to continue to generate interest in this aspect of the hobby, and will be willing to
answer any questions, or help in any way.
John, did you find the plans vs the construction article on the Ladyhawk difficult to understand?
What scale up are you doing.
I would be interested a CAD version if it is engineered better that the original.

(in reply to fly103-RCU)
       Post #: 26

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/7/2004 12:07:26 PM   
vicman



Posts: 6215
Joined: 12/8/2002
From: Valdese, NC, USA
Status: offline
OZ, great to hear form you! I have flown the Quest X-30 and read the article about you guys and your project in the NARS mag. I thought you did a great job! Have you thought about making the plans of your test scale ships available? I don't want to get too radical with the larger or hybrid motor stuff just because of the price. however I have no prob with G size and under. I have been wanting a good rc rocket glider project, however the only plans that have been offered are for the estes Astro Blaster which I just had plotted and am getting ready to build. I would love to get a set for that F-14 in the previous posts but have not gotten a response. It would be nice to give a Lady Hawk a whirl, having learned RC on the old Dave Brown sim I also flew the LH a bunch.

Let me know about the plans for the X-30!


_____________________________

Bigger Badder Meaner Faster!
Revver Brotherhood & NMPRA #41

(in reply to ozzie111)
       Post #: 27

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/7/2004 11:41:24 PM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
My Lady Hawk was a 150% scaled up version. I took the outline of the plans and basically did my own structure. I did keep the horizontal flat spar shape. I also changed the airfoil from fully symmetrical to a semisymetical one with built in reflex at the rear end. For a Delta wing airplane it glided very well. This lifting airfoil did
cause one problem though. You needed full down trim for takeoff and you still needed to control it during the boost phase. I never did air start a second motor like
the original one, mainly because of the high cost of the motors. When I do get around to making a set of CAD drawings for a slightly different version I will use only
one motor mounted above the center line of the fuselage to help with the Up pitching problem that my first one had. If anyone has an idea on how far above the
centerline I should put the engine I would like to hear from you. I actually did create a set of CAD drawings for my new rocket plane but it appears it is one of the
few things I did not back up off my machine before I formatting the hard drive and reloading all of the software. Oh well, I learned the hard way.

John Boren

< Message edited by John Boren -- 1/7/2004 11:44:16 PM >

(in reply to vicman)
       Post #: 28

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/8/2004 2:04:23 AM   
ozzie111


 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/9/2003
From: Waco, TX, USA
Status: offline
vicman,
We built several small test model of the X-30. As I describe all of these models, understand that the scaling factor is based on motor tube diameter. The large X-30 was designed around
a 98mm tube to accomodate a full M motor. The first test vehicles were 29mm. These were
designed specifically for certain flight profiles. we designed 2 for straight boost tests, 1 for
testing our backup parachute recovery system, and 1 for glide testing. The glide test was performed by dropping the aircraft from under one of my large sport .80 powerd R/C planes.

None of these are really good for boost to glide recovery. Our main test vehicle was designed around a 24mm motor tube. This is the model we used for boost to glide trials to determine
proper control throws, and C.G. location. I do not have any proper plans for these models.

The 98 mm model was constructed from CAD drawn plans, but I will be unable to provide a copy of these plans. Sorry. It is kind of expensive to fly at $350 per flight, and thats if you
already own the M motor case.

I am however working on some CAD plans of a vehicle that will be based on a 38mm motor
tube. This model will fly on G motors, and be AMA legal since G motors are considered model
rocket motors. You will have to be patient with me on these though. My CAD skills are a little
less than fast. I will post here when I have the plans completed. I am also considering a laser
cut kit if there were a demand.

Another great flying large rocket glider is the Aerotech Phoenix. It is really an advanced build
but a great design. They can sometimes be found on ebay.

John,

One thing that I have found with rocket gliders is that they really need to have symmetrical airfoils, and be set up zero-zero for boost.

What I usually do is set up my landing/flap trim on my transmitter so when I boost everything is zero-zero, and once I reach apogge I hit the switch to glide trim. This is like putting reflex
into the airfoil. That is what we did on the X-30. If you think flying a rocket glider is a kick in the pants, try recovering from an inverted boost behind you. Don't ask how I know.

As far as motor placement, it is best to have it as close to center line, and on the C.G. as possible. I think it is better to have the motor above the centerline, than below it.
If you can put it on the G.C. it is easier because you don't have to worry about trim changes.
One problem we had to overcome with the X-30 was that the C.G moved back as the fuel burned. That is exactly the opposite of what you want. It's no fun going unstable on boost.
Again, don't ask how I know.

On another note, The Firebat that Great Planes sells can be converted to a reasonable rocket glider or 29mm motors. If anyone is interested in how to do this conversion, let me know.

Oz

(in reply to John Boren)
       Post #: 29

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/11/2004 6:03:48 PM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
I will agree that a fully symmetrical airfoil would make life much easier for the boost phase, but that does take some of the FUN out of having a Rocket Powered Plane in the first place. I also like to have the better Glide Ratio offered by a truly lifting airfoil section. Attached is a screen print of the New CAD drawing I am working on for my replacement G-Powered rocket glider. I don't want to simply build another scaled up version of someone elses design. The basic outline shape is the same and the wing will most likely have the same type of wide flat spars but that's where the similarities end. I will have only one engine in this bird. I will also make another one for electric powered which is yet another reason I wanted a lifting reflexed airfoil.

John Bore

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by John Boren -- 1/11/2004 9:08:52 PM >

(in reply to ozzie111)
       Post #: 30

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/11/2004 10:47:26 PM   
ozzie111


 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/9/2003
From: Waco, TX, USA
Status: offline
John,

That is really cool looking. Is it based on a 29mm motor?
I will be interested to learn how it flies for you. What airfoil is that.
What CAD program are you using?

Thanks,

Oz

(in reply to John Boren)
       Post #: 31

RE: My Rocket Plane - 1/12/2004 2:10:35 AM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
Yes, the plane is designed around a 29mm mount. You could of course use a 24mm adapter to use lower thrust motors. The airfoil is a modified eh10070. I used Compufoil for the wing and then exported it as a DXF file. AutoCad 2000 was used for the rest. I have just about completed the drawings with all of the formers. I am not sure if I will have the parts laser cut or not for the prototype. The fuselage sides will have notches cut into them for the locations of all the formers. I may thin down the airfoil section a bit more and maybe change the spars a little, so until I finalize the wing I can't finish the fuselage drawing.

John Boren

(in reply to ozzie111)
       Post #: 32

My New Rocket Plane - 4/3/2004 6:25:00 AM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
I posted some drawings a while back of my new rocket plane. Yesturday I started to frame up the prototype. So far it weighs 12 ounces. I should have it flying in the next couple weeks weather permiting. I still need a name for this design, any ideas.

John Boren

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to big_ stik_ 40)
       Post #: 33

RE: My New Rocket Plane - 4/3/2004 5:03:02 PM   
ozzie111


 

Posts: 16
Joined: 12/9/2003
From: Waco, TX, USA
Status: offline
John,

I really like the look of that. Great improvement over the Ladyhawk.
Keep us posted.

Oz

(in reply to John Boren)
       Post #: 34

RE: My Rocket Plane - 4/17/2004 4:21:39 AM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
Well, it's almost done. I just need to cycle the battery pack a few times and mount the top hatch and it's ready to go. All up weight is 21 ounces plus what ever motor I choose to use. I've mounted the push rods since this picture was taken. I still need a good name for this bird, any idea what I should call it?

John Boren

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to ozzie111)
       Post #: 35

RE: My Rocket Plane - 4/23/2004 3:20:28 PM   
olliew23


 

Posts: 2
Joined: 4/23/2004
From: warminsterwiltshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
i have tried using 2xD12 15 engines on a zagi with a modified holder.It flies really easily but the motors only last for around 30 secs but boy do they get some height. i am trying to modify the zagi for ignition whilst in mid flight.the Zagi are more than able to fly with the rockets attached.the only thing that i am looking to do now is to find an onboard switch to ignite the zagi mid flight or even use 2 with a 4channell reciver for 2 mid flight boosts.

has anyone any ideas for an onboard switch to for on/off power supply remotely?

(in reply to John Boren)
       Post #: 36

RE: My Rocket Plane - 4/23/2004 5:03:55 PM   
John Boren


 

Posts: 48
Joined: 6/9/2003
From: Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Status: offline
I think Jomar makes an electronic switch that will be able to handle the current needed to ingnite the engine. You simple plug it into a spar channel in your reciever.

John Boren

(in reply to olliew23)
       Post #: 37

RE: My Rocket Plane - 4/24/2004 4:20:45 PM   
olliew23


 

Posts: 2
Joined: 4/23/2004
From: warminsterwiltshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
i'll give that a try and see how it goes,cheers for the info and keep you posted on the progress.

(in reply to John Boren)
       Post #: 38