Ernest-T
Posts: 169
Joined: 11/9/2003 From: Lewisville,
NC, USA Status: offline
|
I've flown both, but only built the Pica WACO. Both are good fliers, with the EAA bipe being more on the acrobatic side, and probably a little faster in the air. The Pica WACO is a real builders kit...........basically a box of sticks, but builds a really light biplane. I would suspect that the BUSA kit is easier to build, based on other kits from there that I have built. The 91 will be more than enough power for either (I know you will have to cut a hole in the cowl of the WACO to fit it in........not sure about the EAA). I would lean toward the EAA bipe if you want easier building, and maybe more acrobatic (translate to a little harder to handle in the air), and the WACO for a nicer looking (IMO) slightly more sedate flier with lots of variations and detailing possibilities if you are into scale stuff. You can't go wrong with either, Good luck!
_____________________________
Martin AMA: 240487
|