RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is the preferred type?  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is the preferred type?
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

[Poll]

2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is the preferred type?


2-Cycle because it costs less to purchase
  4% (5)
2-Cycle because it weighs less
  5% (6)
4-Cycle because of the sound it makes
  45% (49)
4-Cycle because it is more fuel efficient
  2% (3)
4-Cycle because it swings a larger propellor
  37% (40)
2-Cycle because it has less moving parts
  3% (4)


Total Votes : 107


(last vote on : 8/10/2008 12:41:02 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is... - 1/28/2006 9:32:05 PM   
Tommy_Gun



Posts: 720
Joined: 4/7/2004
From: Ione, CA, USA
Status: offline
All my 4 strokes give great performance and sound while swinging a bigger prop on my various warbirds.

The YS110's on my warbird racers have that unique resonance as they go ripping by that no 2 stroke can duplicate.

The only problems I have had with ANY 4 stroke engine, has been with engines I picked up in swap meet "deals".

And as long as we are debating RC things here....................... Mode 1 rulz!

_____________________________

Yeeeeahhh seee.
Say hello to my leetle fren.

(in reply to Richard L.)
       Post #: 51

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/28/2006 11:01:47 PM   
cochinito77


 

Posts: 184
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: mcchord afb , WA, USA
Status: offline
I agree with you guys that a 4 stroke sounds way better and you get that scale look especially swinging that mondo prop, correct to the size BUT, how many of us are in the hobby cause we have oodles of bucks hanging out of our pockets??? i mean c'mon!!! Most of us have a wife and kids and we save up to get the kit or ARF we want then we either have to play the musical engine game or save even longer to get the motor we need or let alone want . i have mostly 2 strokes and one four stroke that was given to me, and i prefer the two stroker, cheaper, faster, lighter, so what if it uses a wee bit more gas, and sounds like a swarm of bees... 10 to 12 bucks a gallon doesn't kill me. i mean am i right? or am i the only penny pincher here??? maybe its the military job, i knew i shouldve gone to college first to make the big bucks!!! j/k i love what i do and if i have to wait to get what i want in my hobby cause i dont make the bucks then so be it!!! But really guys those four strokers are EXPENSIVE!!!! thats crazy!!! well that was just my two pesos, even if you dont ask me...

(in reply to Tommy_Gun)
       Post #: 52

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is... - 1/28/2006 11:17:37 PM   
Richard L.



Posts: 8775
Joined: 7/28/2002
From: Redmond, WA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FlinVR

The YS110's on my warbird racers have that unique resonance as they go ripping by that no 2 stroke can duplicate.

You mean like this? Corsair/YS 110FZ High Speed Pass

Sounds more like a supercharger whine to me

_____________________________

http://www.WarbirdObsession.com/
Tamiya Panther, Tamiya King Tiger(3), Tamiya Tiger I, HL Tiger(3), HL Panzer III(2), HL Panther, HL Pershing, HL Bulldog, WSN T-34/85, HE Leopard 2A5

(in reply to Tommy_Gun)
       Post #: 53

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which is... - 1/29/2006 12:54:38 AM   
jeffk464


 

Posts: 1243
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: cerritos, CA, USA
Status: offline
Cochinito I agree with you completely on the 2 stroke thing but then again thats just my preference. For me 2 strokes are cheap powerful and 100% reliable if they are set up correctly. I have a tower .46 and a gms .47 both of which get flamed a lot on this web site and the only time they quit on me is if my fuel is starting to go bad. If I wasn't worried about cost at all, I'm sure I could find some great 4 strokes that would keep me and my ears very happy. I'm thinking about moving up to 13-18lbs sized planes and I cant think of any 4 stoke engines that will pull that much weight along with performance that a super tiger 2300 can for $150.

Oh, and I prefer brunettes .

(in reply to Richard L.)
       Post #: 54

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 1:29:17 AM   
cochinito77


 

Posts: 184
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: mcchord afb , WA, USA
Status: offline
jeffk-
at first i was like huh? brunettes?? then i had to go up and re-read HAHAHAHA thats a good one i left myself open on that one... i own a TT .46 and a o.s 46, and a TT .61 and those three have been the best engines ive seen, at the field always there, always runnin never any probs. and cheap too!
brunettes, blondes, reddies once your married it dont matter. its all good!

(in reply to jeffk464)
       Post #: 55

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 1:45:52 AM   
nchrome


 

Posts: 703
Joined: 3/27/2002
From: Galesburg, IL, USA
Status: offline
Cochinito you think that fourstrokers are expensive try electric now we're talking. I too am in your boat but through the years I too just wished an then one day I bought and bought and bought but I realy love the soud and sometimes the reliability of some fourstrokers. Electrics though are very expesive some of the motors are not too expensive and some are very expensive and thats not counting the speed controls and batteries. I have a couple electrics but I'm not going to stay with them just not enough money for them and not enough for what I realy love. More planes more planes got to have more planes.

(in reply to cochinito77)
       Post #: 56

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 4:36:01 AM   
camdyson



Posts: 842
Joined: 7/20/2005
From: Bairnsdale, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
Hey richard, NIIIIIICE! I'll have to build a Corsair one day with a FS (radial while I'm dreaming) - they're hard to beat on a fast pass and the sound definitely helps.

Mostly I fly 4-strokes and it's the ease of running that impresses me - my OS70 and OS90 never falter, and start first time every time. I'm about to run in the ST75 2-stroke in my TF P47 so will get a chance to compare - 1st 2-stroker for a while!

As an aside, I was looking for an engine for one of my current projects, a Skyshark 1/6 Me109G. Needed a 90-ish 4s but only the RCV's fitted - don't want to cut up the cowl, and they overheat if not well cooled. Enter Saito 100ti inline v-twin. Fits, 4s, and should sound COOOOL!

Same old problem though - need $$$$$$ to get one Still, I know people who go through $100 p/w on cancer sticks, so hang the expense! (No kids if you must know..... )

Either way, if it's in a warbird and it's running, it's a good engine.

Cheers,

Cam

(in reply to nchrome)
       Post #: 57

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 5:16:45 AM   
cochinito77


 

Posts: 184
Joined: 7/7/2005
From: mcchord afb , WA, USA
Status: offline
i think this is the best ive read! well said camdyson!
quote:

Either way, if it's in a warbird and it's running, it's a good engine.

looks like no matter where the man has us by the walnuts!

< Message edited by cochinito77 -- 1/29/2006 5:17:09 AM >

(in reply to camdyson)
       Post #: 58

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 2:08:30 PM   
CorsairJock



Posts: 1939
Joined: 4/14/2002
From: Parchment, MI, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nchrome
Cochinito you think that fourstrokers are expensive try electric now we're talking. ......................
Electrics though are very expesive some of the motors are not too expensive and some are very expensive and thats not counting the speed controls and batteries.


Someone must be making a lot of money off of you, because you are implying that the electric motors themselves are "very expensive".
I have an AXI 4130/16 brushless motor in my electric powered Hanger 9 Corsair. AXI motors are very well known among the electric comunity, and are considered to be top of the line. The motor AND speed controller together cost less than the most popular 4 stroke engine for this plane (Saito 1.00), and that's not counting the servo that it takes to throttle the fuel powered engine. The only thing that really seemed expensive was the fuel, or battery packs. But unlike fuel, this is a one time purchase (well, for 2 or 3 years anyway). The entire electric power system weighs less than the fueled up Saito 1.00 system.

In a nutshell, anyone who states that electics are 'way to expensive' and/ or are more expensive than fuel power sysytem are just like the ones who thought that 4 strokes weighe more than 2 strokes: TOTALLY OUT OF TOUCH/ LIVING IN THE PAST (I'm trying hard to not use the words I REALLY want to use).

And anyway, to all those looking to take the 'cheap' route, I've got some bad news for you: WARBIRDS are EXPENSIVE!
Even if you skimp on the motor, how much does it cost to make a warbird at least halfway right?
Kit: $150
Retracts: $100
RoboStruts: $75
Rx, 6 servos, battery pack $100
Dummy engine, cockpit kit, pilot $30
3 Wheels $15
adhesives $20
Covering, OR paint, 'glass cloth $40

That's a good $500, before the engine, and not counting all the blood sweat and tears. That's fairly typical cost of a 1/9 ~ 1/7 scale warbird. A good 4 stroke engine will cost somewhere around $300, 2 stroke I don't know (cause I don't have the time to waste looking them up). The above mentioned AXI motor and 40 ~ 45 amp speed control: I think less than $250 now.

But, if you're talking strickly ARFs, that is another (and cheaper) story.


< Message edited by CorsairJock -- 1/29/2006 2:15:08 PM >


_____________________________

Avatar: Electric Powered, Highly Modified Hangar 9 Corsair

(in reply to nchrome)
       Post #: 59

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 6:00:07 PM   
nchrome


 

Posts: 703
Joined: 3/27/2002
From: Galesburg, IL, USA
Status: offline
Your rite about the electrics. Except if you already have the glow or gas engines on hand. I personally don't realy know all that there is about electrics. Except in my opion without being a math wiss there is no way to tell what motor is rite for what plane its all a big secret to most electric flyers. I know that if I build a forty powered plane then I can get a forty or what ever engine for that plane . But if I want to go electric I have to whip out the slide rule and the paper and start figuring out the weight,airfoil,prop size, wing load, the amount of time I want to fly . I have enough work in the plane alone. I surly don't want to have to find out that I need a collage degree (I'm only a highschool grad) to get my bird in the air. I presenly have a C-47 electric (brush motors)and rite now I have an extra $60.00 in just speed controls Then the lipos to get a ten min flight will cost about $240.00(thats 2P-3S packs 2400 mil amp) and for that ten min flight I will need two of these. Plus a battery saver cost ? too keep from drawing too much juice from them now we need a lipo charger . Thats my piece but I do love my fourstroker mostly the Mag XLs. I've had very good luck with these. I once did have a YS 63 that just didn't run on 15% fuel . So I traded it off for a used OS forty. I also have 6 yes 6 OS 26 fourstrokers that will go in either my B-17 or my B-24. Now I've said my piece and sorry if I offended anybody Just Venting a little.

(in reply to CorsairJock)
       Post #: 60

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 6:42:56 PM   
jeffk464


 

Posts: 1243
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: cerritos, CA, USA
Status: offline
CorsairJock, the thing that saves you with your pricelist is that if you plan it right you can re-use allmost all of the parts on your list. I'm currently building a top flite 190 and figure I can re-use my servos, engine, retracts, and my fuel tank in all of the planes on my list.

top flite:
Mustang
thunderbolt

Red Star rc:
Lagg 3 (hopefully, still not for sale)

Brian Taylor:
bf109

(in reply to nchrome)
       Post #: 61

RE: 2-Cycle or 4-Cycle for a 1/7-1/8 Warbird? Which i... - 1/29/2006 8:16:15 PM   
CorsairJock



Posts: 1939
Joined: 4/14/2002
From: Parchment, MI, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nchrome
I personally don't realy know all that there is about electrics. Except in my opion without being a math wiss there is no way to tell what motor is rite for what plane its all a big secret to most electric flyers. I know that if I build a forty powered plane then I can get a forty or what ever engine for that plane . But if I want to go electric I have to whip out the slide rule and the paper and start figuring out the weight,airfoil,prop size, wing load, the amount of time I want to fly . I have enough work in the plane alone. I surly don't want to have to find out that I need a collage degree .


You are right, it is more challenging determining correct setup for electrics (battery, prop, motor), because of the way manufacturers label/ number the motors. There isn't an electric motor out there that says on the label 'use this motor inplace of brand X .75 2 stroke'.
Here is a web-site tho, that should help out a lot. All you do is 'plug in' a possible combo (motor, prop, battery) and it will provide a pretty good idea of what to expect as far as performance (thrust, duration, prop speed), If the figures don't look good for whatever project you are planning, try another setup.
http://brantuas.com/ezcalc/dma1.asp

quote:

ORIGINAL: nchrome
I presenly have a C-47 electric (brush motors)and rite now I have an extra $60.00 in just speed controls Then the lipos to get a ten min flight will cost about $240.00(thats 2P-3S packs 2400 mil amp) and for that ten min flight I will need two of these. Plus a battery saver cost ? too keep from drawing too much juice from them now we need a lipo charger .


You don't say anything about size/ weight. But it seems you are paying too much for Li-Pos, and not getting good results. I have two 3S (11.4 volt) 4400mAH packs in series in my Corsair. That's 22.8 volts, 4400 mAH, from which I get two 7 minute flights per charge (or one 12 minute one). Total cost for the packs about 1 year ago was $165, I have over 100 flights on them. I expect to use them this coming summer with same results. 3rd year, I'll have to wait and see. And I have flown this plane up to 6 times in same day, altho 2 times is the norm.
Tower has some 3S 2200 packs for under $75 each, and there's a guy selling 3S 1800 packs here at RCU Marketplace for $45. Admittedly, these will cost more than the nitro fuel needed for a year or 2 for a plane the same size/ weight. But don't forget to add glow plugs into the fuel power cost.

Bottom line (again): a carefully selected electric motor and speed control can be cheaper and lighter than fuel power system needed for same plane. LiPo battery packs cost more, but not as much more as some seem to think. How much do warbird pilots spend on fuel (and glow plugs) a year? And this isn't about 'which type of motor is better for a warbird', this is more about setting the record straight and dispelling myths. But if I was into jets and/ or multi-engine warbirds, electrics would definately be my 1st choice.


_____________________________

Avatar: Electric Powered, Highly Modified Hangar 9 Corsair

(in reply to nchrome)