B-24 Nut
Posts: 81
Joined: 10/5/2002 From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA Status: offline
|
I wish I had my Mustang back, but I would likely usually drive the Mazda. The Mazda is more comfortable, quieter, safer, gets better gas mileage, handles better and is much more powerful than the Mustang was with it's cam, headers, intake, etc. The Mustang was a high 12 second car. My Rotary has no pistons, rods, cam nor valves. I had the Mustang up to 140+ mph with it's 3.5 rear gear. The Mazda has a 4.10 rear gear and I've had it up to 186 mph. The Mazda's redline is set at 9700 rpm. If I forget to turn off the a/c, the computer does it for me at 5300 rpm. The Mazda's factory computer is on a shelf. It now has the Haltech engine management system. I tune with a notebook computer from inside the car. It also has a wideband Oxygen sensor so that I can tune, in real time, for max power. It's just different having a small, high winding turbo engine vs a big n/a V8. I like them both, for different reasons and will have a big V8 again in the future. My friend has the same car as I do, except that he has a LS1 in it. I outrun him every time (He hasn't modified his 345 bhp engine). His is though, eaiser to drive as he has much more low end torque than I. If I could have only his or mine, I would choose his, but only for around-town driving. If to win a race..., mine, mine, mine! The 1.3L screamer!!!!!!!!!! Mike
|