Conflicting Info on CG   
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Profile and Fun Flying Planes >> OMP - Ohio Model Products Support Forum >> Conflicting Info on CG
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Conflicting Info on CG - 3/18/2004 2:33 PM   
Jim D



Posts: 325
Score: 100
Joined: 12/5/2001
Last Login: 1/29/2009
From: Columbia, TN, USA
Status: offline 		Ok, I just checked my plans again for the FF Edge 540 and the CG mark is almost exactly 4.75 inches behind the leading edge of the wing. But in re-reading the Billy Hell review, he states the CG range is given as 5.5-6.75 inches. OK, so what gives?

This bird is for 3D so where do I go with the CG. I do have a hard time getting into harriers now, and the planes suffers from wing rock (moderate) until I get it at a really steep harrier under power. Is this why? Mine is balanced at 4.75 spot on.

_____________________________

Jim Davenport


Hide Signatures
       Post #: 1

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/19/2004 1:02 AM   
DKjens



Posts: 2091
Score: 100
Joined: 2/10/2002
Last Login: 3/16/2010
From: Pasadena, CA, USA
Status: offline 		Jim,
Does your plane fly nose heavy or tail heavy. How much elevator, if any, and which way, is needed when flying inverted? Elevators and harriers are fun, in the way the wings can rock or not. The thing is to keep the velocity down, which means keep the nose up. A wings stall point is dependent on AOA and velocity. First thing is to balance the plane for basically hands off flying upright and inverted, or maybe even a little tail heavy where plane pitches up when slowed down. Then you have a well balanced plane and can work on other problems during elevators and harriers.
DKjens

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jim D)
       Post #: 2

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/19/2004 3:44 AM   
Jim D



Posts: 325
Score: 100
Joined: 12/5/2001
Last Login: 1/29/2009
From: Columbia, TN, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks for the reply DK, and yes I was planning on starting to ease the CG back myself to see what happens. Right now it's pretty close to neutral on the inverted vs upright trim. One of the issues I am having is that I almost have to completly stop the plane and then use throttle to work the tail under it. If it is even flying ever so slow, it just climbs when I touch the elevator.

Part of it is that I am a 3D newbie. But after seeing the conflicting data between Billy Hell's review and what is on the plans, I was also sorta looking for an official clarification from Mike P. or someone at OMP.

_____________________________

Jim Davenport


Hide Signatures

(in reply to DKjens)
       Post #: 3

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/19/2004 2:58 PM   
AFSalmon



Posts: 4225
Score: 100
Joined: 5/24/2002
Last Login: 3/18/2010
From: Beavercreek, OH,
Status: online 		Jim,

4.75 is a conservative starting point as the plane is very stable at this point. I can't imagine having the cg as far back as 6.75 inches but I've seen some pretty extreme things done for the sake of 3D. After all we are the 1%ers. I always tell folks to trim the plane for level flight and then roll inverted. At 3/4 throttle, the plane should still fly level or just very slightly drop the nose. Move your CG back slowly as you get used to this setup and the wing rocking will stop. Wing rocking is a sure sign of nose heaviness.

Mike Pilkenton
Ohio Model Planes

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jim D)
       Post #: 4

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/19/2004 3:41 PM   
Jim D



Posts: 325
Score: 100
Joined: 12/5/2001
Last Login: 1/29/2009
From: Columbia, TN, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks Mike. It's right on 4.75 with empty tank, and I have noticed it acts better as the tank empties. In fact, I doinked it the other night from around 5-6 feet. I got into a nice steep harrier and it really settled in, I was in the groove, I was also out of gas! No harm done but a broken prop.

Again, thanks for a great plane. I will see about moving the engine back a tad and see what I get.

_____________________________

Jim Davenport


Hide Signatures

(in reply to AFSalmon)
       Post #: 5

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/20/2004 1:07 PM   
Absolut Yak



Posts: 515
Score: 100
Joined: 2/16/2003
Last Login: 3/11/2010
From: Trenton, SC, USA
Status: offline 		Ummmm, if the CG is from the leading edge, I have the CG about 1/8" aft of the plans right now. That puts my CG right at the 6 3/4" mark. Flew it for the first time yesterday and can't complain too much. Hovered really nice, definite nose up inverted, but maybe that is a trim issue at the throttle settings I was loafing around at. Kinda nose high on approach, got a little slow and sproinked it from about two feet. Broke the prop, though. Looks like I have to do some work and get the CG at least to the wing tube. Is that correct? MVVS 2.15, Bisson profile muffler, Zinger 22 X 6 (might change that with this next prop). Imagine that, tail heavy with the big engine up front.

Doug
Orlando

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jim D)
       Post #: 6

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/20/2004 8:59 PM   
Jim D



Posts: 325
Score: 100
Joined: 12/5/2001
Last Login: 1/29/2009
From: Columbia, TN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: djccrn

Ummmm, if the CG is from the leading edge, I have the CG about 1/8" aft of the plans right now. That puts my CG right at the 6 3/4" mark. Flew it for the first time yesterday and can't complain too much. Hovered really nice, definite nose up inverted, but maybe that is a trim issue at the throttle settings I was loafing around at. Kinda nose high on approach, got a little slow and sproinked it from about two feet. Broke the prop, though. Looks like I have to do some work and get the CG at least to the wing tube. Is that correct? MVVS 2.15, Bisson profile muffler, Zinger 22 X 6 (might change that with this next prop). Imagine that, tail heavy with the big engine up front.

Doug
Orlando


Doug, I'm talking about the 40 size Edge, not the 80 incher

_____________________________

Jim Davenport


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Absolut Yak)
       Post #: 7

RE: Conflicting Info on CG - 3/20/2004 9:56 PM   
Absolut Yak



Posts: 515
Score: 100
Joined: 2/16/2003
Last Login: 3/11/2010
From: Trenton, SC, USA
Status: offline 		Whew! I was worried. I was mentally figuring out how to carve up the fuse to move my rear battery pack. Guess I'll keep flying just like it is until I figure out what I like best.

Doug

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Jim D)
       Post #: 8

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Profile and Fun Flying Planes >> OMP - Ohio Model Products Support Forum >> Conflicting Info on CG
Page: [1]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.672RCU1