Boomstriker
Posts: 406
Joined: 1/15/2002 From: New Haven , MO, Status: offline
|
Both of mine ran OK on the test stand too, but the stand only simulates level and upright flying. Even an MDS can be tuned for reliable running when fuel pressure is constant. In a hover or any type of 3D is when a finicky engine is going to have problems because the fuel deliver is subject to gravity and extra G forces affecting it, and this temperamentalness is only compounded as the tank goes from full to empty. When you get the high needle rich enough to pull from hover at full throttle without overheating and detonating, then they get very rich in the mid and will flame-out if held there very long. Leaning the top anymore puts it in the dangerous lean condition when nose up. The only way to combat this is to lean the low as much as possible to help with the mid. The only way I could drop-in from any altitude was at a idle, because it would load-up REALLY bad when nose down and with any throttle applied. If not, I had to rev it up every couple seconds on the way down to keep it cleaned out or it was sure to die when I went to add power. This makes landing, slow flybys or any 3D maneuvers very risky. IMO, using an MDS in an overpowered 3D or funfly is just asking for trouble. As I've said before, maybe in straight, level and upright flight on an under powered plane where it's near wide open most of the time, maybe you could consider it a reliable engine. I have never seen anyone using an MDS reliably for 3D or aerobatics, on a heli or for any type of competition. Aside from a few that seem to want them for their collection, I've only seen trouble and disappointment, first hand and on the forums. If I bought every MDS engine that's been a PITA in someone else's plane and ran on my stand, just think how big MY collection would be.
|