RE: 4 Strokes  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> RC Fuels >> RE: 4 Strokes
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 4 Strokes - 10/17/2005 8:30:35 PM   
Motorboy



Posts: 1627
Joined: 2/7/2004
From: Bergen, NORWAY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: toprudder


The oil in our glow engines serves two purposes, to lubricate AND to cool.


toprudder...

You forgotten more thing oil can do it :

1. lubricate
2. cool
3. prevent rust
4. cleaning engine
5. prevent leakage

Jens Eirik

_____________________________

Jens Eirik
All landings are just controlled crashes!

(in reply to toprudder)
       Post #: 51

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/18/2005 3:48:15 AM   
downunder



Posts: 3105
Joined: 10/10/2002
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: toprudder
The oil, after combustion, carries a lot of the heat from the engine out of the exhaust.

I've always had a problem with this idea because of the tiny amount of oil that comes out the exhaust with each stroke. Basically, what comes out must exactly equal what goes in. So to use rough but probably reasonably accurate figures this is how I figure it. You have an engine that uses 10 ounces of fuel in 10 minutes running at 10,000 rpm (nice round figures ). Or in other words, an ounce of fuel per minute. But 20% of that fuel is oil so in one minute only 0.2 ounces of oil passes through. In the meantime the engine has turned 10,000 times which means that every rev only 0.2/10,000 or 0.00002 (or if you like, 5/100,000) ounces of oil comes out the exhaust per rev. For those of us who prefer metrics this is 0.0006cc.

Whichever way, this is a tiny volume of oil and can't absorb enough heat to make any difference.

(in reply to toprudder)
       Post #: 52

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/18/2005 1:43:09 PM   
Fuelman


 

Posts: 996
Joined: 12/31/2001
From: Jordan, NY, USA
Status: offline
People have often thought that oil carries away heat, its primary purpose is to keep the metal parts from contacting each other, and reducing friction and therefore lowering the operating temp slightly. As Downunder said there is not enough oil to perform that function. The primary coolant in the fuel is the methanol. Everything in the exhaust stream is going to be hot including any raw fuel from incomplete combustion.


_____________________________

Fuelman
Cooper Fuels LLC

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 53

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/18/2005 2:18:14 PM   
toprudder


 

Posts: 167
Joined: 10/4/2005
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: downunder

quote:

ORIGINAL: toprudder
The oil, after combustion, carries a lot of the heat from the engine out of the exhaust.

I've always had a problem with this idea because of the tiny amount of oil that comes out the exhaust with each stroke. Basically, what comes out must exactly equal what goes in. So to use rough but probably reasonably accurate figures this is how I figure it. You have an engine that uses 10 ounces of fuel in 10 minutes running at 10,000 rpm (nice round figures ). Or in other words, an ounce of fuel per minute. But 20% of that fuel is oil so in one minute only 0.2 ounces of oil passes through. In the meantime the engine has turned 10,000 times which means that every rev only 0.2/10,000 or 0.00002 (or if you like, 5/100,000) ounces of oil comes out the exhaust per rev. For those of us who prefer metrics this is 0.0006cc.

Whichever way, this is a tiny volume of oil and can't absorb enough heat to make any difference.

Well, when you put it like that -- I have always used that same logic when people talk about how additional oil will raise the compression ratio and cause detonation. This was something Clarence Lee used to say a lot.

All I can say it that the oil comes out of the exhaust HOT. Sometimes adding an additional 2% of oil is all it takes to make hot engine run cool. Most four-strokes (not YS) depend on the oil film to CONDUCT heat from the piston to the sleeve. There is no fuel/air stream in the crankcase to cool the the piston from the bottom. (This is not true on YS which used the bottom of the piston as a pump for the supercharging effect). The small amount of blow-by is how the oil gets there. I have opened up my OS Surpass before and found a large amount of oil in the bottom end.

Another thing I hear is that adding oil reduces the amount of combustibles in the fuel, which will reduce power. That is not true, IMHO. You will simply need to open the needle valve slightly, to get the same ratio of COMBUSTIBLE fuel/air mixture. A tank will not last quite as long, however. Most people won't notice.

Another observation I've had is that adding nitro will allow you to use a higher percentage of oil, and the combination will give you more power AND run cooler. I had a helicopter a LONG time ago that would overheat terribly with 10% nitro fuel. I did everything I could think of, including trying different brands, and finally I bought a gallon of Missle Mist (which IIRC was 25% nitro). At this point I did not care if I was going to burn it up. It ran great, and no hint of overheating. I've also had the same observation in pattern, with both two-strokes and four-strokes, that adding nitro does not necessarily make the engine run hotter, as long as the compression is correct for the nitro content. I've used as much as 40% nitro in four-strokes, including an OS 1.20 Surpass. 25% seemed to be the best amount for me. Now before everybody flames me I read an article many years ago that explained this. Nitro actually burns cooler than methanol, BUT, it expands to a much larger volume than methanol when it burns. Most people say that heat = power and power = heat, but that is not true in an internal combustion engine, it is all about expansion inside the cylinder.

I can dig up that article if anyone is interested.

Bob R.

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 54

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/18/2005 5:42:53 PM   
downunder



Posts: 3105
Joined: 10/10/2002
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
toprudder
You've touched on another couple of myths as far as oil goes (no, I'm not doing another Mythbuster ).

I've read those stories about how adding oil will raise the compression but I never knew Clarence Lee subscribed to it too (I don't read magazines). Virtually all of the oil just forms a film over every surface so it's not part of the mixture anymore. As Fuelman said, it's primary purpose is to reduce friction heat but I'd say it helps more than a little. Try running an engine without oil and see what temp it gets too or try running with too little oil. The extra temp comes from increased friction so if an engine runs cooler after adding some oil then it didn't have enough to start with.

Every engine is different but they all need a certain minimum flow rate through them. I've got an ST G51 that gave every sign of overheating while flying even with 20% all castor. I couldn't figure out why until it dawned on me that it was extremely economical on fuel which meant there wasn't much flow of oil. I upped the content to 25% and from then on it was a totally different engine.

The other myth you touched on was about adding oil reduces the combustibles and reduces power. Sure, it reduces the amount of combustibles in the tank (by a very small amount) but the needle valve controls the flow rate of the methanol/nitro, not the methanol/nitro/oil. The oil is just along for the ride no matter how much is in there but with the same volume of methanol/nitro then you must have the same power.

What you observed with your helicopter engine running cooler could maybe be explained by both the oil flow needs and the needle setting (assuming both fuels had the same oil content). With the higher nitro you had to open the needle more to get the right air/fuel ratio but because this means you burn fuel faster it also means a higher flow rate of oil through the engine. It's complicated a bit by the fact that the higher fuel flow gives better internal cooling so I'd guess both played a part. So theoretically, adding nitro should allow you to use less oil but why risk it?

(in reply to toprudder)
       Post #: 55

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/18/2005 6:38:09 PM   
toprudder


 

Posts: 167
Joined: 10/4/2005
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: downunder

What you observed with your helicopter engine running cooler could maybe be explained by both the oil flow needs and the needle setting (assuming both fuels had the same oil content). With the higher nitro you had to open the needle more to get the right air/fuel ratio but because this means you burn fuel faster it also means a higher flow rate of oil through the engine. It's complicated a bit by the fact that the higher fuel flow gives better internal cooling so I'd guess both played a part. So theoretically, adding nitro should allow you to use less oil but why risk it?

Absolutely agree. Nitro burns at a much richer ratio than methanol, so anytime you increase nitro you have to open the needle valve. (Again, that has been my experience). More fuel flowing through the engine does mean more oil, but also more fuel means more cooling affect from the atomization of the fuel as it enters (especially on two strokes).

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 56

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 9:01:51 AM   
XJet


 

Posts: 3174
Joined: 3/31/2003
From: Tokoroa, NEW ZEALAND
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: downunder
I've read those stories about how adding oil will raise the compression but I never knew Clarence Lee subscribed to it too (I don't read magazines).


Don't dismiss the oil-ratio/compression-ratio thing to lightly.

Although it doesn't actually increase the compression ratio (nothing other than changing the ports, crank stroke or head volume will do this), using more oil does increase the peak chamber pressure immediately prior to ignition -- that's because the oil is incompressible and therefore the air in the cylinder is compressed into a smaller physical space than it would otherwise be. So in effect, using more oil can give the *effect* of running a higher compression ratio.

A great example of just how this *does* cause problems is the large-sized SuperTigre engines. If you try to run them on 20% oil they will backfire, knock and give all the symptoms of detonation -- because that's exactly what's happening -- even with 0% nitro. They're designed for low oil-levels and the use of too much causes pre-ignition combustion chamber pressures to rise too high.

In order to make these large 2-strokers run sweetly you *must* use no more than 15% and preferably around 12% oil.


_____________________________

When I'm not here, I'm at RCModelReviews

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 57

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 1:30:55 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10379
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
Virtually all of the oil just forms a film over every surface so it's not part of the mixture anymore. Brian, in my mind, the time it takes for compression and combustion to occur I don't see there being enough time for such separation to occur. I think we have discussed this in the Diesel Forum before, I know that Bob Davis subscribes to the theory that higher oil content increases compression because its not compressible. I'm not trying to settle this here nor stifle this discussion, just expressing my thoughts.

I'll have to digress a little here and say that I didn't buy into the theory about the big Tigres not running well on 20% lube until I bought a 3000 and then a 4500. Now, why doesn't this high oil content effect them when converted to Diesel? More points to ponder.

< Message edited by hobbsy -- 10/19/2005 1:43:29 PM >


_____________________________

Giant Saito, 73.2 Cu. In., 70.5HP @ 5,800 rpm, 79 ft. lbs torque @ 3,500 rpm, 57 mpg, 3.50 bore, 3.81 stroke. 563 lbs.

(in reply to XJet)
       Post #: 58

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 3:44:48 PM   
toprudder


 

Posts: 167
Joined: 10/4/2005
From: Raleigh, NC, USA
Status: offline
If the higher oil content in the big 'tigers were the issue, then would adding another head shim correct the problem?? Could be that the conversion to diesel does not have the problem since the compression is adjustable. (I messed with Davis conversions on smaller engines where the compression was adjustable, I assume the Tigers would be the same).

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 59

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 3:56:20 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10379
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
I don't think that would change anything, they run like they are too rich and no amount of needle adjusting will make them run better. I broke in both of the above mentioned engines on Fox 5% nitro fuel with 20% 50/50 lube, niether would clear out when ran at high throttle.

_____________________________

Giant Saito, 73.2 Cu. In., 70.5HP @ 5,800 rpm, 79 ft. lbs torque @ 3,500 rpm, 57 mpg, 3.50 bore, 3.81 stroke. 563 lbs.

(in reply to toprudder)
       Post #: 60

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 4:35:29 PM   
downunder



Posts: 3105
Joined: 10/10/2002
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hobbsy
Brian, in my mind, the time it takes for compression and combustion to occur I don't see there being enough time for such separation to occur.

Hobbsy, in my mind , there's a good coating of oil all over every surface inside the crankcase so some at least must seperate out in there. Actually I suspect most of it might if only from the centrifugal action of the swirling. Then there's the turbulence in the cylinder which must seperate out more oil to get that film on the liner. There'd also be a film covering the combustion chamber but that would be fairly static because obviously there's no moving parts to wipe it off then replace it. Same goes for the piston crown to some extent which could explain why you can get a build up of carbon on the head and piston.

My guess (and I don't know of any way to prove it) is that most of the oil seperates out onto the surfaces and then gradually migrates through many cycles to the exhaust port and out.

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 61

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/19/2005 6:57:39 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10379
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
That makes two of us then because my theory is not provable either, aren't those "I think" things wonderful?

_____________________________

Giant Saito, 73.2 Cu. In., 70.5HP @ 5,800 rpm, 79 ft. lbs torque @ 3,500 rpm, 57 mpg, 3.50 bore, 3.81 stroke. 563 lbs.

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 62

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/20/2005 3:06:54 AM   
downunder



Posts: 3105
Joined: 10/10/2002
From: Adelaide, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hobbsy

...aren't those "I think" things wonderful?

Yep, I think they are. I'd guess engineers for something like Yamaha might have a good idea of what happens but the chances of them stumbling across this forum are fairly remote

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 63

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/20/2005 4:11:31 AM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10379
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
I will have add that I have a MERCO .61 gasoline engine that would get hot and quit when run full throttle for more than a minute. I was running it at 32 to 1 gasoline and LawnBoy ashless oil. I added four ounces of castor to the mix and instantly have a completely reliable engine.

_____________________________

Giant Saito, 73.2 Cu. In., 70.5HP @ 5,800 rpm, 79 ft. lbs torque @ 3,500 rpm, 57 mpg, 3.50 bore, 3.81 stroke. 563 lbs.

(in reply to downunder)
       Post #: 64

RE: 4 Strokes - 10/21/2005 2:43:06 AM