XJet
Posts: 3215
Joined: 3/31/2003 From: Tokoroa, NEW ZEALAND Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Flyboy Dave You know jessie....these fuel mixers don't say squat about the synthetic oil in their fuel...or just what the heck brand it is. You would think they would be shouting from the roof tops about how...." I blend with Super Zoomer synthetic oil, and it's the best, and it has such and such properties of this, that, and the other". They don't say squat....and in fact most won't tell you what they use, nor will they give you the properties or specs of their wonderful oil. There must be a reason for that. Probably if we had the specs, we wouldn't buy the stuff. Plenty of folks have mentioned the names of the synthetic oils they're using with great success. Coopers, Motul, Aerosynth, Aerosave -- these are all synthetics that offer significant improvements in performance and protection when compared to the Klotz and Morgan synthetics that most N.Americans associate with the term "synthetic oil". Our entire club has been running their engines (predominantly 46-sized but also a few 90's, 100's and 180s) for over a year on fuel with 12% Coopers Plus C and we've had *zero* mechanical failures and no indication of unusually high wear (in fact we seem to be experiencing *less* wear than when we were using Klotz/Morgan oils at 20%). And we're talking about a group of fliers who range from "just learning -- (what's a needle-valve?)" to keen 3Ders who load up a .46-sized engine with large 12" paddles, and hardcore fliers who regularly run their engines at 16,000 RPMs+. Even after importing a "superior" oil directly (and paying ridiculous postage rates), it still works out costing us *less* to blend this fuel than it does to blend fuel with Klotz or Morgan's oils because we can use less. Of course we get the other benefits too -- less time spent cleaning models, cooler running, better throttle response, more power and more consistent engine handling in both very hot and very cold weather. It's worth nothing that the Plus C blend we use *does* have a little castor -- I don't think I'd run any ABC engine without just a few percent of castor as a "lube of last resort". Castor has its strengths, synthetic has its own strengths (especially the more advanced synths) Castor has its drawbacks, synthetic has its own drawbacks (but fewer in the case of more advanced synths) The final word(s) on castor should (IMHO) be: "Castor is a handy and cheap insurance policy. If you think you'll never need it, don't use it. However, if you want to take out a policy, just use a few percent and you'll get most of the benefits with few of the drawbacks."
_____________________________
When I'm not here, I'm at RCModelReviews
|