trainers    Gallery
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Beginners >> trainers
Page: [1]

Tower Hobbies Get Coupon Codes Brands  
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
trainers - 10/5/2004 5:07 AM   
legend234


 

Posts: 6
Score: 100
Joined: 9/13/2004
Last Login: 5/19/2013
From: Alton, IL, USA
Status: offline 		which gas powered trainer would be the best to start with?

Hide Signatures
       Post #: 1

RE: trainers - 10/5/2004 5:13 AM   
Knighthawk2100


 

Posts: 123
Score: 100
Joined: 8/12/2004
Last Login: 7/9/2011
From: Westport, MA, USA
Status: offline 		Sig Cadet LT40 with a .46 Engine. Plane is awsome, and If you don't have a radio get a Futaba 7C

_____________________________

Remember when Inverted Down is Up and Up is expensive!!!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to legend234)
       Post #: 2

RE: trainers - 10/5/2004 7:00 AM   
DBCherry


 

Posts: 5554
Score: 106
Joined: 1/25/2002
Last Login: 2/19/2011
From: Hubbardston, MA, USA
Status: offline 		IF you can afford the 7C, by all means do it. If not, a standard 4 channel radio will serve you fine for a couple of years. The LT-40 with a 46 (say the Thunder Tiger PRO) is a good suggestion.

Find out what radio equipment your instructor uses, and go with that. You'll want it to be compatible with his.
Dennis-

_____________________________

He who dies with the most toys is, none the less, still dead.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Knighthawk2100)
       Post #: 3

RE: trainers - 10/5/2004 7:06 AM   
twistr



Posts: 482
Score: 100
Joined: 8/24/2004
Last Login: 2/5/2011
From: Lone Grove, OK, USA
Status: offline 		If you've got the Xtra $$$ to spend, a Sig Kadet Sr. is a great trainer plane. Very easy to fly and landings are so predictable and smooth. Runs good on grass runways too.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

Fly 'em if ya got 'em !!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to DBCherry)
       Post #: 4

RE: trainers - 10/5/2004 11:35 PM   
высшее одно


 

Posts: 487
Score: 100
Joined: 6/12/2004
Last Login: 9/29/2005
From: a place in, NJ, USA
Status: offline 		I would suggest a SuperStar, It slows down nice, Has strong landing gear, easy to asemble, Forgiving, and can do basic areobatics, The only thing is that if you are takeing off high grass be ready for a long takeoff roll

Hide Signatures

(in reply to twistr)
       Post #: 5

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 1:26 AM   
exeter_acres



Posts: 7455
Score: 116
Joined: 9/22/2004
Last Login: 9/24/2012
From: Johns Creek, GA, USA
Status: offline 		AT our field the LT-40 is the most popular.... there are also several Seniors at the field....

either one would be nice...

The ARF is very nice to start with...just built mine and it is going for its maiden tomorrow night

Hide Signatures

(in reply to высшее одно)
       Post #: 6

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 2:22 AM   
ballgunner



Posts: 2136
Score: 104
Joined: 2/1/2003
Last Login: 4/11/2013
From: Payson, AZ, USA
Status: offline 		Depending on your eyesight and reaction time either the LT40 or the Senior Kadet are both fine trainers. If you intend stay with RC it's probably best to start with the LT40 because it has ailerons. The Senior is rudder/elevator and throttle only. Great for just flying around the patch and it's a large, easy to see airplane. I've had both and have no complaints about either one. Older guys pick the Senior because of its size and slow flying capabilities.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to exeter_acres)
       Post #: 7

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 2:24 AM   
ballgunner



Posts: 2136
Score: 104
Joined: 2/1/2003
Last Login: 4/11/2013
From: Payson, AZ, USA
Status: offline 		P.S. Forgot to mention that the Kadet Senior ARF has ailerons on it's 80" wing.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to ballgunner )
       Post #: 8

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 2:33 AM   
viper1676


 

Posts: 112
Score: 100
Joined: 7/23/2004
Last Login: 4/26/2013
From: West Warwick, RI, USA
Status: offline 		I learned on a Tower hobbie MKII...Good plane..very good flight characteristics....lands VERY slow, almost floats in....Very cheap only $80....only negative is that the nose wheel gear has a very short upper rod(where it connects to firewall), and is only connected by a small nylon sleeve and 2 small screws. Slightest bump and it will rip off...easy fix is to get a longer nose gear that extends into the motor mount.
Also flew very well with an OS 46LA...not the best choice if your looking for performance but it flew this plane great...but personally I would probably spend the extra few bucks for the Thunder Tiger 46pro...better powered motor
Hope this helps
Viper

_____________________________

Pull up....Pull up...Wait I'm upside down!!!!!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to ballgunner )
       Post #: 9

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 10:35 AM   
plivez


 

Posts: 23
Score: 100
Joined: 5/18/2004
Last Login: 9/9/2006
From: ColchesterEssex, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline 		The Prangster sounds good, check out the last post on this thread.

http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/JP_Prangster%3F__What_do_you_think%3F/m_1382424/tm.htm

Hide Signatures

(in reply to viper1676)
       Post #: 10

RE: trainers - 10/6/2004 10:49 PM   
mattbeme



Posts: 42
Score: 100
Joined: 6/15/2004
Last Login: 8/12/2006
From: Windsor, ON, CANADA
Status: offline 		Before I bought my trainer I did a thorough research of this site and a few others and the 2 most recommended trainers were--LT 40 and Hangar 9 Alpha. I bought the Alpha as it was more affordable for me. I feel the LT 40 is a little better made-stronger and higher quality. However, the Alpha comes complete with radio and Evolution .46 Ball Bearing engine. It sells for about $275 complete. A good deal. The plane flies wonderfully and the engine is powerful and very reliable. Many postings say the same. Very few people have had complaints about this plane. It is very popular at my field. The landing gear is very rugged. I once flew for 4 hours straight practising taking off and landing. Most of the many, many landings were hard. The landing gear would bend, then you just bend it back into position and go again. Some of the other trainers would have had the gear just rip right out and damage the fuse.

Also, I had hit a wire, sheared the wing off with the fuse diving right into asphalt. Beleive it or not, the fuse had only minor damage which was fixed in one evening and I was out again the next day. No engine damage either.


If you can find a good used engine and good used radio gear then you could buy an LT 40 and keep the cost to about the same as the Alpha.

Matt

_____________________________

Why won't crashing win me any awards? I'm so good at it!

Hide Signatures

(in reply to plivez)
       Post #: 11

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Beginners >> trainers
Page: [1]





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

RC Universe is a service of Internet Brands, Inc. Copyright © 2001-2013.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


0.281RCU1