2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!!  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!!
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/25/2004 10:58:43 PM   
DragonHeart


 

Posts: 639
Joined: 7/15/2003
From: UK
Status: offline
Hi Guys,

Ive been flying lots of different types of planes, 3D Sport and the odd warbird or 2, but the questions is i love Warbird such as the Spitfire, Mustang etc etc................

I have a couple of sport scale ones but i want to spend alot more time building a scale warbird..... but i fly off a very bumpy grass field........ should i stick to a fixed undercarridge or go for retracts........ i would much prefer retracts as warbirds just dont look the same without...... but am i asking for trouble ?????????

If i go with retracts........ what type should i try ? Mechanincal ? Air Sprung ?? etc etc ............ i need them to last and be strong if i use them..

Any Help would be grateful............
       Post #: 1

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 12:11:26 AM   
kram-RCU



Posts: 484
Joined: 10/6/2002
From: ames, IA,
Status: offline
Warbirds look better and fly better with the wheels up.

However, any individual's flyer's transition to retracts is often "bumpy" and expensive. I have a "chaos theory" that probability of aircraft annihilation is relative to unfamiliarity with the type of plane, and unfamiliarity with the mechanical systems on board, so if you start out landing a type of plane you're new to (warbird) on a new type of gear (retracts), then the odds of a bad outcome go up quite a bit.

Even at big warbird meets with smooth runways and professionally built planes and highly skilled pilots, it seems like 90% of the "problems" (everything from skinned bellies to re-kitting) are due to retracts and the dozens of ways that they can malfunction.

Your comment about the "very bumpy" field is bothersome. Retracts will fly OK off grass, but any set has its limits.

As a flyer who has gone through the transition, I'd advise you to go one of two directions:

1) Start with small, cheap warbirds with small, cheap mechanical or spring-air retracts till you get comfortable with the technique, the technology. If you mess up, then at least you don't have a lot of $'s on the line. World Models makes a series of small ARF warbirds in which small, cheap mechanical gear is included. Replacement sets cost only $20. I found them to be fun and easy to use on a "moderately bumpy" grass field and easy to replace...kept a couple of spare sets around all the time. Be careful...I think their .60 size planes have the same gear as the .40 size. I think the gear was OK for the smaller size, but pushin' it for .60's on grass.

2) But you know this craving for warbirds is not gonna stop till you get some big smokin' bandido with a 100" wingspan and a big loud gas engine, or even worse, TWO big loud gassers. If you're resigned to such a fate, then be forewarned that a good set of air-driven gear, by the time you add it all up will run $400 and up....way up. In my opinion, Robart is the standard of quality for that kind of gear, although Sierra is better, if you can get 'em, and other small custom guys do a good job. Bottom line is if you think you got a really good, cheap deal all you really got was cheap. Century Jet is a big name that a lot of guys badmouth because of lesser quality control, but other guys get along with. I'd have to count myself in the former group. Even with the good brands, the more complex the mechanism, the higher the chance of malfunction, ie twisting, rotating, tucking, even gear bay doors should be avoided.

On the up side, the bigger the plane, the bigger the gear, the bigger the wheels, and hence, the less relative effect of a bumpy field.

Robart has a huge selection of gear, and my strategy on grass has always been to choose a set designed for a plane heavier than mine. For example, if my plane is expected to weigh 15#, I order a set of gear designed for >18#, and if it detracts a little from scale, then so be it. Gotta make sure it fits in your plane, though!

Order your gear early. Even big companies like Robart can have delays of 2-3 months and the small guys are worse.

On the more minute scale of advice:

a) make sure you Loctite those little needles that control flow rate through the retract valve, and:
b) make sure your cats don't have access to your air lines.
c) always have a plan in the back of your mind: "What would I do if my gear didn't work?" I presented a funny (if it wasn't you) riddle on Twin Forums a coupla months ago when a P-38 gear malfunctioned and I didn't have a plan.

OUCH !!


mt

(in reply to DragonHeart)
       Post #: 2

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 12:19:42 AM   
F4u5



Posts: 1819
Joined: 1/19/2002
From: Apple Valley, MN, USA
Status: offline
If the real bird have retracts, the model must have retracts is my motto

_____________________________

Where's my glue?.......I gotta build.

(in reply to kram-RCU)
       Post #: 3

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 12:55:21 AM   
JGrc



Posts: 690
Joined: 2/24/2002
From: Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Status: offline
Dragon,
there is no reason not to fly a warbird off grass with a proper and reliable set of retracts these days. I've been flying my BTaylor Spit for years, off grass and dirt and never had trouble with my 400 series Spring Air. They are not too expensive either but you need to use them with oleo struts to take full advantage. My Spit weights about 19lbs. One of the things that you should consider is the grass too tall? the bigger the wheels the better, matter of fact the bigger the plane the better too. YOu should start with a 70 to 80 inch warbird. 60 size birds are harder to fly.
In my opinion the only warbirds that don't need retracts are WWI type. Check http://mywebpage.netscape.com/warbirdscale/
Have fun
JG

(in reply to DragonHeart)
       Post #: 4

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 12:58:37 AM   
Doug D.


 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 10/10/2002
From: Wilson, NC, USA
Status: offline
Put them ! You'll wished had later when it's to late. i e at the flying field doing a low pass across in front of you !!!
Nothing ventured nothing gained !!!

(in reply to DragonHeart)
       Post #: 5

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 3:32:41 AM   
km6tj


 

Posts: 75
Joined: 4/6/2002
From: Lancaster, CA,
Status: offline
Ditto F4u5.
If the real one had retracts, by all mean go with retracts. I use Spring-Air retracts on my B-24 and they are fairly reliable, although the heavy duty set with the oleo strut, like the 400 series someone mentioned earlier, would be better. I would consider Robart retracts, only because I like the idea that air pressure can drive them down, whereas the Spring air depend on spring pressure only to go down. Sometimes mine bind up in the wheel wells and it takes some g forces to "help" them down. That being said, Robarts require a second air line so the plumbing and valve is more complicated.

Right now, I am working on a C-46 being built from plans that did not specify retracts. It is going to be a challenge to make them realistic, but it will be worth the effort. Fixed gear on any scale model that had retracts is almost criminal.

Good luck
Ken

(in reply to Doug D.)
       Post #: 6

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 4:33:22 AM   
Richard L.



Posts: 8775
Joined: 7/28/2002
From: Redmond, WA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DragonHeart

should i stick to a fixed undercarridge or go for retracts


I would go for retracts. It's a sin to fly a warbird without retracts unless the full size has fixed landing gear, such as a Stuka or a Val. Plus, retracts will force you to improve your landing skill.

Can you imagine a warbird, such as my Bearcat here, doing low passes with the gear hanging down? Bearcat Low Pass

(in reply to DragonHeart)
       Post #: 7

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 6:57:52 AM   
DragonHeart


 

Posts: 639
Joined: 7/15/2003
From: UK
Status: offline
Thx guys for all ur answers and detailed explinations

Yes i will go with Retracts , i agree it just doesnt look the same without and i am starting with 40 Sized Warbirds and will have to stick to those until my car grows bigger as i cant get anything bigger than a 65" Wingspan in .........

(in reply to Richard L.)
       Post #: 8

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 9:55:46 AM   
a65l



Posts: 1481
Joined: 12/7/2003
From: va veach, VA, USA
Status: offline
If you're gonna do a .40 sized bird, stick with the mechanical retracts. Reasons are:

1. Simplicity. Once you get the linkages set up, you'll never have to fool with them again. Ever.

2. Reduced field gear... you won't need to bring/buy a small compressor to charge up your air bottle.

3. Cost.... about 1/4 the cost (if they're not included in the kit) of a comparable air retract system

4. Weight.... two retracts and a servo are less than two air retracts, a bottle, and a control valve. On .40 sized warbirds weight is everything....

Once you get the bug and go larger, mechanical retracts loose most of their advantages, and air makes the most sense. Especially with a trike geared airplane.


Andy

_____________________________

In God I trust.
All others pay cash.

(in reply to DragonHeart)
       Post #: 9

RE: 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!! - 10/26/2004 3:51:49 PM   
voyager_663rd


 

Posts: 1193
Joined: 2/11/2003
From: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
And make sure you learn how to grease your landings. Ask me how I know. Bent a lot of gear (and still learning) on my chip but it's coming along. With practise, I've got to about 4 out of 5 are smooth. It's a problem getting past that 5th landing though . No plane damage, just a bent gear (think they're s.a.).

_____________________________

Len-> More questions than answers some answers are here [url]http://www.freewebs.com/rc_tips_and_hints[/url] 18,000+ hi

(in reply to a65l)
       Post #: 10

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Warbirds and Warplanes >> 2 Retract or not to Retract !!!!!!!!
Page: [1]





Jump to: