RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem   
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
    Search This Thread  
 
Printable Version


90 Degree Muffler Adapter
Seller:  RC Specialties
Details:   $19.95   |  3/19/2010   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem
Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 4/13/2005 12:37 AM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Harry Lagman
I recently tached a couple of GMS .47s with stock exhausts with the 12 1/4 x 3 3/4 APC prop while helping set them up. We got between 11,700 and 12,000 at sea level. Your 12,080 seems about right based on my experience with these engines. The 14,800 must have been a false reading.


I suppose it is possible it was a false reading. The only other factor that was different, was that the 14,800 was taken in 20 degree weather, vs 60 degree's with the 12,080 on my engine. I don't think that can account for the 4,720 RPM difference, though

Andy.

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Harry Lagman)
       Post #: 201

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 4/14/2005 10:02 PM   
Keefer



Posts: 229
Score: 100
Joined: 6/15/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Santee, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: XJet

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayne Miller

This means that a pressure nipple placed at the point of highest gas velocity will produce *very* poor results and may actually end up sucking as much (if not more) than it blows.

The *best* place for a pressure nipple is at the point in the muffler where the gasses are travelling at the lowest velocity (and therfore the pressure is highest). This is typically (although not always) at the point where the nuffer is widest.



On the GMS engines with a large-bore carb, the best source of pressure is the crankcase, not the muffler. My GMS76 crankcase puts out more pressure than the YS pressurized fuel systems. So the engine never quits by running lean after it warms up.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to XJet)
       Post #: 202

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 4/15/2005 6:24 AM   
Flyboy Dave



Posts: 13680
Score: 110
Joined: 3/20/2002
Last Login: 3/17/2010
From: San Bernardino County, CA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

XJet....
I suggest those interested take a look at the following links for more information
(and note that air *is* a fluid that is often considered incompressible at subsonic speeds)



OK....air is a fluid....and can't be compressed....

...you need to go back to science class, son.

FBD.

_____________________________

An engineer says.... "That will not work".
A mechanic says..."Oh yeah, watch this".
"Old age, and treachery will overcome youth and skill".
Revver Bro #4.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Keefer)
       Post #: 203

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 4/15/2005 7:53 AM   
XJet


 

Posts: 3849
Score: 100
Joined: 3/31/2003
Last Login: 3/24/2009
From: Tokoroa, , NEW ZEALAND
Status: offline
Just follow the links I provided and see for yourself. I didn't invent the science -- don't kill the messenger :-)

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyboy Dave)
       Post #: 204

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/9/2005 4:14 AM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hi,

Just an update, I just finished fighting a GMS .47 that had the modification.

It would die right after takeoff or prolonged wide open throttle. We checked with my 15% nitro synthetic/castrol blend fuel and it worked fine.

I forgot the obvious - the problem ended up being old fuel.

Just thought I'd pass it along.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller

Hide Signatures

(in reply to XJet)
       Post #: 205

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/19/2005 6:30 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
While my engine is running well, I am playing with a concept that might be helpful for the .47. I have set up a uniflo tank, which should help with fuel delivery. I am thinking it will especially be helpful when hovering. I tried it with a check valve between the muffler and the tank, and that was a disaster. While I know they recommend a check valve, so fuel can't flow back to the muffler, the fuel tank pressurized to much. After running at high rpm, the pressure forced too much fuel back through the carb, screwing up the idle and transition. I removed the check valve, and the engine running was consistant. It seemed as though I went through fuel faster though. Not sure how much fuel went through the muffler when throttling back. My buddy and I talked about setting up a tank with some sort of a pressure regulator, to keep tank pressure the same, no matter what the tank level or rpm of the engine. I am figuring it would have to maintain a steady 2.5 to 3 lbs. I have some idea's how to accomplish this, but maybe someone reading this knows of such a device that is already made,....

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Wayne Miller)
       Post #: 206

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/22/2005 4:40 AM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
I flew the uniflo tank on my .47 today, and I couldn't believe the difference. It took a good running engine and made it great! I can't put my finger on it, but I think the difference was that the mid range was more linear and faster to respond. I had a whole new confidence in my plane. I would encourage anyone to try this tank configuration, especially if you like to hover!

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 207

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/22/2005 3:03 PM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hi Andy,

I'm interested in learning more about this tank - where can I find information on it?

Thanks for letting us know the results.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 208

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 12:10 AM   
Keefer



Posts: 229
Score: 100
Joined: 6/15/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Santee, CA, USA
Status: offline
Try the July 2005 issue of Fly RC Magazine. Good description in there, with a simple drawing.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Wayne Miller)
       Post #: 209

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 3:35 AM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Keefer is right, Fly RC Magazine is where I got it. The instant throttle response and consistancy of RPM at different stick positions has me wanting to change all my planes to this setup. If you would like, I will try to describe the hookup. Unfortunatley, the Great Planes tanks, with the two built in nipples and one nipple in the rubber stopper, are not candidates for this hookup. I am bummed , because that is my favorite tank.

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Keefer)
       Post #: 210

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 3:46 PM   
Dean in Milwaukee


 

Posts: 35
Score: 100
Joined: 2/6/2005
Last Login: 11/6/2006
From: milwaukee, WI, USA
Status: offline
Found this thread last night, pulled apart my first gen. .47 motor and found the offset hole just like all the others.

This morning I disassembled and used the nipple as a guide for the biggest drill bit I had that spun freely inside the nipple, drilled, then blew out with brake cleaner and reassembled and ran it, on the ground only so far.

Seems to have worked! Before, to ensure good running with the nose pointed up, both at 1/2 throttle and full required a overly rich mixture, both on low and high speed needles, which of course hurt power. Now, I'm only slightly rich sitting level, ( couple of clicks), and the motor will actually pick up a bit of rpm when nose up from the inherent lean out in this position, just like its supposed to.

Importantly, it only took just a few minutes of fiddling to get it running right, where in the past it was much more difficult to get right.

Throttle response is improved as well, importantly as this is installed in a tufflight 4d. It'll be nice to actually try some hovering without worrying about lack of power or a flame out.

I'll report back after a test flight.


Dean in Milwaukee

< Message edited by Dean in Milwaukee -- 5/23/2005 3:50 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 211

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 3:54 PM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hi Dean,

Thanks for the input, I look forward to your first test flight report!

If you still have difficult adjustments on the carb, you may want to drill the intake nipple and brass insert one size larger than you did.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dean in Milwaukee)
       Post #: 212

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 3:58 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Hey Dean!

Add the uniflo tank to that equation and you will even get better consistancy. The uniflo tank allows you to set the carb for best running on the ground. That setting is not supposed to change in the air, because gravity, for all practical purposes, is removed from the equation. Gravity affects the force of fuel flow without muffler preasure. The more fuel in your tank, the more gravity feed. If you get your preasure line and carb line at the same reference point, gravity is no longer the factor it once was. I set mine up on the ground to scream, and expected it to go real lean when I pointed the nose up. To my surprise, there was no noticeable difference. I didn't tach it, but my calibrated ear didn't notice anything.

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dean in Milwaukee)
       Post #: 213

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 6:22 PM   
Dean in Milwaukee


 

Posts: 35
Score: 100
Joined: 2/6/2005
Last Login: 11/6/2006
From: milwaukee, WI, USA
Status: offline
"Hey Dean!

Add the uniflo tank to that equation and you will even get better consistancy"


I will probally try that out too. Anything for better throttle response during a hover.

Now if I can only get some more stiffness into my 4d's tail control linkages to stop the flutter at medium speeds. Maybe a pull/pull setup will do it.


Dean in Milwaukee

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 214

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 6:32 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Dean:

I am putting a 4D together right now, also. The only way you will get rid of the flutter is to make the high speed modifications they show on the Tuff Flight website. It is basically the addition of counter balance weights for the elevator and rudder. The setup appears easy.

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dean in Milwaukee)
       Post #: 215

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 7:30 PM   
Dean in Milwaukee


 

Posts: 35
Score: 100
Joined: 2/6/2005
Last Login: 11/6/2006
From: milwaukee, WI, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the tip Andy, its too late for me to move the surfaces a couple of flutes without cutting new surfaces, but I was able to easily add counterweights by inserting heavy nails in the leading edges facing forwards. I did'nt put them out on the edges but closer to the root to hopefully not snag objects as easily.

I needed to add tail weight anyways, so hopefully this extra mass will raise the speed the surfaces will flutter to reasonably high speed.

Looks like good weather tommorrow morning, should be able to get a couple of flights in before work. Maybe I'll have both a good running motor and a flutter free tail.


BTW, I had mostly solved the elevator flutter problem by the simple expedient of CA'ing the elevator 1/2s to the carbon shaft forcing them to stay locked in perfect alignment with each other. This means that for any elevator flutter to occur, both elevator surfaces must flutter together, and, both elevator linkages must flex together as well, effectively doubling the force it requires to deflect each elevator surface individually.

If you do this, the only trick is to put grease inside the brass tube so that the CA won't wick inside locking the whole assembly solid. Don't ask me how I found out that one.


Dean in Milwaukee

< Message edited by Dean in Milwaukee -- 5/23/2005 7:38 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 216

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 7:41 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Ooops! Yea, I forgot about the different position for the axle on the tail feathers. I guess i am in the same boat you are. Did you have any trouble with the wing being a little warped? I have one side with a little dip in the last 10 inches or so. It isn't a twist, but an actual dip. Not sure what to expect out of it. Thanks for the tip on the carbon rods. I am not that far yet. The dip in the wing tip stalled me .

Andy

< Message edited by Flyer Freq -- 5/23/2005 7:43 PM >


_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dean in Milwaukee)
       Post #: 217

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 8:43 PM   
Dean in Milwaukee


 

Posts: 35
Score: 100
Joined: 2/6/2005
Last Login: 11/6/2006
From: milwaukee, WI, USA
Status: offline
The wing was easy to straighten just by using the tried and true " twist it while using the heat gun " approach. This works on mine even with me using zagi tape for covering instead of monocote.


Dean in Milwaukee

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 218

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 8:53 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
I was a little afraid to get too close with the heat gun, for fear I would melt the foam. I will give it a try! Thanks!

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Dean in Milwaukee)
       Post #: 219

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/23/2005 9:37 PM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hey Guys,

Your hijacking my thread here on the GMS .47, if you don't mind, how about starting a new thread to discuss the 4D. Thanks.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller

< Message edited by Wayne Miller -- 5/23/2005 9:38 PM >


Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 220

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/24/2005 4:35 AM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Sorry Wayne, as I am sure you are aware, it is easy to have it happen.

I hope you find the info on the uniflo tank helpful!

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Wayne Miller)
       Post #: 221

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/24/2005 2:08 PM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hi Andy,

I did some reading on the uniflo tank setup and I can only see a couple of dissadvantages. One, when the tank is full, and the plane sitting in the sun, fuel would be pushed into the carb and muffler when the fuel/air expands in the tank. When on the ground one might have to pince the lines with clothes pins or something. Two, when the tank is pressurized at full throttle, then the throttle decreased, the extra pressure in the tank will force fuel into the muffler/carb until the pressure is reduced - I don't know how much fuel would be lost in the muffler from this. One very good thing about this is the automatic pressure release at low throttle.

I like the idea of both the muffler pressure line and the fuel pickup line being controlled by one cluck (both lines attched) but you would have to have a very flexible line to do this.

I'll put some thought into it and will have to give it a try.

Thanks for the idea.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller



Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 222

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/24/2005 4:13 PM   
Flyboy Dave



Posts: 13680
Score: 110
Joined: 3/20/2002
Last Login: 3/17/2010
From: San Bernardino County, CA, USA
Status: offline
Those blatter tanks are used a lot in racing planes, where the pilot doesn't
want to lose fuel pressure in the high "G" corners....and keeps a steady
pressure in flight....keeping his needle valve setting close to the same as
possible.

FBD.

_____________________________

An engineer says.... "That will not work".
A mechanic says..."Oh yeah, watch this".
"Old age, and treachery will overcome youth and skill".
Revver Bro #4.

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Wayne Miller)
       Post #: 223

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/24/2005 4:49 PM   
Flyer Freq



Posts: 927
Score: 100
Joined: 8/20/2002
Last Login: 2/21/2010
From: Appleton, WI, USA
Status: offline
Wayne:

The concept of the pressure and pickup line being on the same clunk baffles me a little. Wouldn't the pressure and flow cancel each other???

I know what you are saying about the fuel loss through the muffler. I suspect there is some. The throttle was so steady and predictable, I don't think I was loosing any through the carb. As I mentioned, I tried the check valve in the pressure line, and that did force fuel into the carb. A bleeder valve of some sort that directs the fuel somewhere else, maybe to a 1 oz. tank that is open to air pressure, is the only solution I can come up with. I don't think I lost much fuel throught the muffler, as I was still up about 10 minutes (10 oz. tank) and I did not notice excessive oily discharge on the tail.

I am anxious to hear your thoughts after playing with the setup. This setup may even tame down the engines without the carb modification. Well, ...maybe that is hoping for too much.

Dave:

I have thought about those bladder tanks too. If I am figuring right, the expansion of the bladder would be a lot like the pressure relief valve I am proposing.

Andy

_____________________________

Lose not thy airspeed, lest the ground rise up and smite thee!
If you want to make God laugh, tell Him your plans

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyboy Dave)
       Post #: 224

RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem - 5/24/2005 5:53 PM   
Wayne Miller


 

Posts: 1030
Score: 108
Joined: 9/10/2003
Last Login: 2/13/2010
From: DrumboOntario, CANADA
Status: offline
Hi Andy,

I found many articles on making uniflow tanks. Some of the articles show the pressure line and pickup line linked to one clunk. I did a quick search and althought the following article is for control line, it is the same for RC - here is the site:

http://home.cogeco.ca/~controlline/tip1.shtml

You'll have to scroll down the page a bit before the pictures start to show. Using two clunks may be better, but I like this idea.

Hope this helps.

Fly4Fun,

Wayne Miller

Hide Signatures

(in reply to Flyer Freq)
       Post #: 225

Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16   next >   >>  
All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: GMS Engine Tuning Problem
Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16   next >   >>  





Jump to:


 
Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America


1.734RCU1