RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Jets >> RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit
Page: <<   < prev  80 81 [82] 83 84 85 86 87 88 89   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 12:35:27 AM   
Eddie P



Posts: 678
Joined: 2/4/2003
From: Reno, NV, USA
Status: offline
Good day of flying today!!

I flight tested the new JetTech 74 ounce tank (Excellent quality tank - I recommend going with the upgraded Jet Tech hardware, it's good stuff). Did not notice the extra weight at all, it was impossible to tell on flying qualities. But, I really did like the extra couple minutes of fuel.

No flight pictures unfortunately, but it was fun, you'll just have to take my word for it

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to highhorse)
       Post #: 2026

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 12:53:31 AM   
u2fast


 

Posts: 1382
Joined: 12/26/2001
From: houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
im pullin an all nighter to maiden mine tomorrow. barry

(in reply to Eddie P)
       Post #: 2027

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 12:56:07 AM   
Woketman



Posts: 4004
Joined: 12/6/2001
From: Slidell, LA, USA
Status: offline
Holy feces Eddie, that thing looks AWESOME!!! What a gorgeous scheme!

_____________________________

Team Hitec/Multiplex, Fromeco

(in reply to u2fast)
       Post #: 2028

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 1:24:16 AM   
TommyWatson



Posts: 973
Joined: 3/28/2002
From: Pendle HillNSW, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
Hi Eddie,

That is beautiful!!. it makes all of our plain old Reactions look very ordinary.

Great work.

I agree with you about the Jettech tanks, especially his screw in fittings. Much better than the bungs.

Regards





_____________________________

Tom Watson
Sydney Australia

(in reply to Eddie P)
       Post #: 2029

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 1:46:18 AM   
highhorse


 

Posts: 589
Joined: 11/16/2006
From: Memphis, TN, USA
Status: offline
Hi guys, i bought Barry's (u2fast) old 54 and have put a wren ss in it. As a poor-man's fix for more fuel I added a sullivan 32 forward of the dubro 50. Lots of room, fits fine. I have yet to run it but the only obvious drawback I can see is that the CG will shift aft just a bit after the main (which is practically ON the cg) empties and the aux begins to burn off. But since I dont plan to burn more than half of the aux we're only talking about burning off half a pound or so that is located sorta close to the CG of an 18+ pound airframe....

And yes, I know SOMEONE is wondering, I did the cg check tanks empty (even UAT) so that even if I run it completely dry, I'm still good on CG and my deadstick landing won't be compounded my wild PIOs in the flare .

With the UAT and aux full my CG will be very conservative with room to go aft after i get more experience with it.

I may get to test run it this week, wish me luck !

_____________________________

RELAX already, it's a freakin' hobby !! :-)

(in reply to TommyWatson)
       Post #: 2030

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 4:44:53 AM   
Eddie P



Posts: 678
Joined: 2/4/2003
From: Reno, NV, USA
Status: offline
Thanks Woket and Tommy! Inside it's still a 54, and it flies like one too, so all good there

As an aside I added an ouce of lead to the nose today to bring the CG just ever so more forward to experiment. My R54 might be a little different due to the inlets and the canopy aerodynamically speaking. But I do seem to get better feel in the round out to flare, the more forward it gets to the 6 inch mark.

I'll be taking the lead out before the next flight because a new 3 cell ECU pack of A123 batteries will go in to replace the Lithium Ion pack. Nothing fatally wrong with the LiIon pack, but the A123 should hold voltage better under load (starts) and will behave better in cold winter mornings than LiIon. It is a touch heavier but I need the weight up front anyhow.

(in reply to highhorse)
       Post #: 2031

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 5:11:16 AM   
highhorse


 

Posts: 589
Joined: 11/16/2006
From: Memphis, TN, USA
Status: offline
Eddie, I'm dying to hear more about those 123's

Let us know how they work out for you, OK?

Thanks, Don.

_____________________________

RELAX already, it's a freakin' hobby !! :-)

(in reply to Eddie P)
       Post #: 2032

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/10/2008 3:35:49 PM   
oistein



Posts: 69
Joined: 7/9/2003
From: Trondheim, NORWAY
Status: offline
Please let me know how you're maiden went Barry. Believe it or not, we actually had flying weather this weekend also. No wind, 5C and sun. Very abnormal this time of the year.







_____________________________

Rgds
Øistein Aanensen

(in reply to u2fast)
       Post #: 2033

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/11/2008 2:25:15 AM   
u2fast


 

Posts: 1382
Joined: 12/26/2001
From: houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
oiston, my norwegian bud. the maiden went off without a hitch, i put 5 flights on her in all. looks like we will be taking it with us at the end of the month. see you soon, barry

(in reply to oistein)
       Post #: 2034

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/11/2008 3:39:35 AM   
rorrock


 

Posts: 110
Joined: 12/4/2006
From: KaleenACT, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
Does anyone have an idea of how the performance/flight characteristics of this model compares to the turbinator by Nick Zirolli.

Rob

_____________________________

AusJets
Jet Central ,X-Treme Jets, RoJets, JetMach dealer

(in reply to u2fast)
       Post #: 2035

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/11/2008 5:08:56 AM   
TommyWatson



Posts: 973
Joined: 3/28/2002
From: Pendle HillNSW, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
The Reaction looks a lot better!!!! , and how could anything fly better than a Reaction anyway.



_____________________________

Tom Watson
Sydney Australia

(in reply to rorrock)
       Post #: 2036

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/11/2008 6:59:30 AM   
Eddie P



Posts: 678
Joined: 2/4/2003
From: Reno, NV, USA
Status: offline
Good job on your successful maiden flight Barry, and of course the four more that followed Did your modifications change the way the model "felt" for you at all? Any idea what weight you were flying at and what you came in at with just the UAT?

(in reply to TommyWatson)
       Post #: 2037

RE: Reaction 54 Jet Kit - 2/11/2008 1:43:04 PM   
u2fast


 

Posts: 1382
Joined: 12/26/2001
From: houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
eddie, i havent got a weight yet. i was up till 3:30 am sunday morning and back at it around 8:30 sunday morning getting her ready. i did not have time to install the fuel and smoke lines in the external tanks, so i flew without them. i did fly with the bombs. i can tell she is a little heavier when picking her up. flying characteristics is about the same. take off roll, maybe a little longer, but not much runway is required either way. could easily fly off of 300 ft or so. landing, i did carry a little throttle all the way around, where on my other reaction, i basically did a lot of idle gliding. but i cant give a good landing comparison due to 15 to 20 mph winds quartering across the runway slightly. so some power was needed for that. i did fly so long once that on final i ran out of fuel. i had full flaps deployed and left them down, as i was almost to the runway. landing this way was uneventful. i think one of the things i like the most is the higher stance that the model has with longer struts and larger tires. i have a bvm bobcat nose retract and robart 635's for mains. tires are also bvm, i think the mains are 2 3/4 or so. she looks good taxing out and ground handling is excellent. my friend shot some video and i will see of i can post some of it, but most of the flight was spent piddling around with 4 other guys flying, and i was watching out for them. loops did feel different, a little bigger and a little more on the elevator on the down side. probably more kingcat like. but overall, i am happy with the new 54. i like the looks and a solid weekend beater jet. barry

(in reply to Eddie P)
       Post #: 2038