IMAC just too expensive

IMAC just too expensive
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

Hangar 9 Showtime 50 + Saito 82 - RTF
Seller: kmac425
Details: $600.00 | 9/29/2008 | Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> IMAC >> IMAC just too expensive

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 2:28:38 PM

Richardfast

Posts: 166
Joined: 12/19/2002
From: Grass Lake, MI, USA
Status: offline

Not complaining, just a fact. I don't want to put 3 to 4 thousand dollars into a plane that invariably is going to crash ( I just get too nervous in competition because of my investment.) Last year I lost two! But instead of just giving up scale aerobatics as too stressful, something like mini-imac (.60 size engine limit) would have been fun. Alas though, our division (NC) just doesn't have the support for that category of competition, nor do any others, I believe. I am thinking that mini-imac didn't make it because that is just too small a scale to get the right juices flowing.

Proposal: A mini-imac class with a propeller diameter limit that corresponds to about a 40 cc engine. I can put together a nice 72" wingspan scale plane with a 1.6 to 2.1 glow or 30 to 40 cc gas engine for under 1200 dollars. That is a big difference from my 33% scale planes that I lost. The beauty of a propeller diameter limit is there is no way to cheat. The CD just gets out the ruler.

Some may say that a 1/4 scale plane can compete equitably with a 33% or 40%, but that isn't true (except if Chip Hyde is the pilot

). The much lower wing loading, and better presentation of size to the judges with a larger plane makes a huge difference in scores for the average pilot.

IMAC is growing really fast. I understand the nationals this year expects over 100 entries in scale aerobatics. That's great, but I just don't want to invest the kind of money it takes in a hobby. Maybe there are others that feel the same way. You can build a 55 pound scale plane that will be a fabulous aerobatic performer, even for an average pilot, but it is going to cost you 10 thousand dollars and the stress of flying it is going to be out of sight. Just watch, that is exactly where IMAC is headed. Pretty soon liability insurance is going to become an issue, just like jets, and we sure don't want that.

Any comments, other than "if you can't stand the heat get out of the fire"?

< Message edited by Richardfast -- 12/21/2004 2:33:14 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 3:10:26 PM

fancman

Posts: 1266
Joined: 11/21/2002
From: N. Charleston, SC, USA
Status: offline

I have to agree with you on all points. Rather than worry about loosing a $4,000.00 airplane, I sold my 35% Carden Extra and backed down to a 1/4 scale plane with a 50cc engine. I can afford the larger airplane but am not willing to put that much money at risk for a hobby. I'm much more comfortable flying a $400.00 arf than I could ever be with a $4000 airplane. I think in time the novelty of flying very large models will probably wear off and things will settle down to a more normal aproach to this hobby. I'm much more relaxed with my smaller airplane and enjoy flying more.

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 2

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 3:53:00 PM

RichD

Posts: 740
Joined: 11/26/2003
From: Martinsville, IN, USA
Status: offline

I have already determined that Intermediate is as far into IMAC as I can go, as I can not afford a bigger plane than a 1/4 scale.

_____________________________

LT-40 - TT .46 pro --- Magic - TT .46 pro
25% Extra 260 - OS 1.60FX --- Hanger 9 Aspire 2 meter glider

(in reply to fancman)

Post #: 3

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 4:31:47 PM

ROGER RUSSELL

Posts: 950
Joined: 12/16/2001
From: Jacksonville, IL, USA
Status: offline

Richardfast:
How did you wreck your 33%er?

I am going the other way, started with a smaller heavier plane (82" Staudaucher w/G45) and went to H9 Extra w/ZDZ 80 and glad I made the move.
Easyist flying plane I have had. You have heard Bigger Flies Better, and I believe it.
I had to sell 4 airplanes to offord this one 33%er, and have not regretted it.
I do know what you are talking about $ wise as I have two daughters in college, and money is tight, but glad I have my bigger airplane.

Moving up to Sportsman this year in IMAC and looking forward to the practicing and first contest.

Roger

_____________________________

Remember to FLY HARD and LAND SOFT

(in reply to RichD)

Post #: 4

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 4:56:27 PM

Richardfast

Posts: 166
Joined: 12/19/2002
From: Grass Lake, MI, USA
Status: offline

Roger,
You are going the exact route I did. Sold some smaller equipment to get my 33%er (Extra 260) with a ZDZ80 also. I practiced a lot and I had no problems at the practice field. I entered my first contest this summer, gave too much throttle on takeoff (nervous as hell), and immediately did the famed left turn ground loop. Cost me a 40 dollar propeller and tore my engine mount loose. I was really embarassed because my club was hosting the contest and I had a lot of friends there. I repaired the plane, practiced some more, thought I was doing really well, and entered a contest in Dayton (Sportsman, should have stayed with Basic but it seemed so easy). On my last maneuver of the sequence, I am too low, too far out, and I do my required positive snap role. Only propblem is I over rotate and come out inverted. I pulled instead of pushed in front of about 50 people. This is something I had done in practice many times (over rotating)and I had no trouble recovering from! Not true at Dayton.. This was a spectacular crash. Were talking straight in and total (including my ZDZ80) destruction. I had at least $3000 in that plane. I think the embaressment hurt more than anything.

I told myself no more competition and built a GP Giles 202 kit with a Tower .75 up front. Oh my gosh do I love this plane. I have maybe $400 in it and it will do everything I ask. The big difference is my composure while flying. I care that I don't crash but I don't worry about it. Soooo, I can't resist, I practice Sportsman pattern and take my Giles to the local contest. Guess what? No sweat, I take third out of six people, I don't get very nervous and I have a great time!

Anyway, that's my story. I am still thinking what to do for the upcoming season, because I do want to compete.

Richard

(in reply to ROGER RUSSELL)

Post #: 5

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 5:06:58 PM

ROGER RUSSELL

Posts: 950
Joined: 12/16/2001
From: Jacksonville, IL, USA
Status: offline

Sounds to me you have everythjing under control.
Glad to see you are still going to compete.
Above all in this sport??? is to have fun and not worry what you are flying.
It is the freinds you meet along the way that counts in the end.
Hope to see you at some of the contest this summer.
I might make up to one in MI, as of now I do the Chicagoland in August and a couple in IL and IN.
Have sent mey money in for th NATS in early July.
Hope to see you.

Roger

_____________________________

Remember to FLY HARD and LAND SOFT

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 6

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 5:35:00 PM

UNLDAVE

Posts: 266
Joined: 1/13/2002
From: prunedale, CA, USA
Status: offline

Hi All ,

On the other end of the spectrum is my perspective...All of my friends are grateful that I fly Imac , They don't want to see me in a Full scale Extra or Pitts flying IAC.."There's old pilots and there' s bold pilots, but there's no old ,bold pilots.."

I would fit into the bold pilots category,hence any model flying on the ground is better for me...

Dave

_____________________________

LIGHT IS RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!
It's not how much you spend to fly good,it's how good can you fly without spending much!!

(in reply to ROGER RUSSELL)

Post #: 7

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 6:38:54 PM

Richardfast

Posts: 166
Joined: 12/19/2002
From: Grass Lake, MI, USA
Status: offline

Thanks for the reply guys. What about my idea of mini-imac being around 1/4 scale size vice .60 size? When our club holds our IMAC contest this year (Mid-Michigan IMAC in Jackson, MI in June) I am going to try and convince the CD's to give that category a try. We have a lot of guys in our club flying the 70 to 80" scale planes. Maybe I can convince them to get involved if they can compete among themselves and not against the real high dollar stuff. I am glad no one is taking this thread the wrong way. I love the big IMAC planes and I am in awe at the talent of the pilots. I just can't seem to get the mental grip it requires.

(in reply to UNLDAVE)

Post #: 8

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 7:12:32 PM

dang_it

Posts: 9
Joined: 12/15/2001
From: Hobbs, NM, USA
Status: offline

I like your idea! Our club has kicked around the idea of holding an IMAC style competition but limiting to 1/4 scale and smaller. We currently have no one at our field that flys anything bigger than 1/4 scale. I am gonna try basic this year but it is gonna be with a 1/4 scale or just a little smaller. I don't want to invest the amount of money required for a 27% or larger plane and find out I don't like the competitve route of flying. I think your idea proposes a level playing field in a category that many people can afford to be in and could turn out to be a whole new class of flyers and competition.

Dang_it

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 9

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 7:28:52 PM

Geistware

Posts: 12946
Joined: 4/9/2002
From: Locust Grove, GA, USA
Status: offline

I guess before I fly in a competition, I get as comfortable as I can with the plane. After a while, it really doesn't make me nervious to fly low and slow. Just flying around people gets me nervious and I will always be that way!

_____________________________

Aircraft Proving Grounds
http://www.rcaircraft.net/
Information on the building and flying of Radio Control Aircraft.
Site for hobbyist in the R.C. Aircraft modeling world.

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 10

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 9:05:06 PM

bhanley

Posts: 445
Joined: 10/17/2002
From: Sammamish, WA, USA
Status: offline

Richard - why a different "Mini" class??? Basic was created to provide
for just the issues you guys are talking about:
- An opportunity to try the competitive environment with
zero investment - assumming you have a plane......
- Fly "ANY" plane - doesn't have to be scale and can be any size
- Straight forward manuvers
- No unknowns

If you are worried about entering Basic and finding youself up against
a 40% plane and hence not being competitive I think you are
"worrying" too much. In my experience here in the NW where I spent
last year in Basic, almost all the guys did in fact fly 1/4 scale planes.
There was only one instance that I recall (out of five contests) the
there was a 40% plane in Basic - and that was only because the guy had
crashed his plane the week before and borrowed the 40 perecenter
so he could make the contest. Also,
I believe it is generally true that most guys who do fly 40% planes
will not even consider Basic but will move directly to, at least,
Sportsman.

Give it a try. IMAC is fun and need not break the bank. It is more a test
of pilot consistency - and the people are really great.
Bruce

_____________________________

Come down gently......

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 11

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 9:23:38 PM

rm

Posts: 237
Joined: 11/29/2002
From: ohio, OH, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Richardfast

Thanks for the reply guys. What about my idea of mini-imac being around 1/4 scale size vice .60 size? When our club holds our IMAC contest this year (Mid-Michigan IMAC in Jackson, MI in June) I am going to try and convince the CD's to give that category a try. We have a lot of guys in our club flying the 70 to 80" scale planes. Maybe I can convince them to get involved if they can compete among themselves and not against the real high dollar stuff. I am glad no one is taking this thread the wrong way. I love the big IMAC planes and I am in awe at the talent of the pilots. I just can't seem to get the mental grip it requires.

That's not exactly the way it works. You will all still fly in the same class, 1/4 scale and 40%, but seperate tallies will be kept for the mini mac placings. The NC's never had a mini mac competition that I know of, not saying it can't be held. Doing it the way you suggest would require 5 more classes as not everyone in this category would be flying the same class, hence the reason everyone flies one of the 5 main classes with seperate tallies for mini mac. Does that make sense?

(in reply to Richardfast)

Post #: 12

RE: IMAC just too expensive - 12/21/2004 9:38:26 PM

John Murdoch

Posts: 1709
Joined: 6/13/2002
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: offline

I believe that IMAC is an orginization that allows anyone who wants, to compete. You have to start somewhere. The Basic class allows for anyone to compete, period.

I also believe that it's a competitive sport like so many others. Try drag racing, stock car racing etc. Talk about expensive!

I agree that to be competitive in the Unlimited Class that you've got to have an airplane that belongs in that category if you expect to take home the throphy. But not having a 40%er doesn't eliminate you from competition. Each contest is really a contest against yourself. If you fly the best you can, and if you fly even better than the time before, then you're advancing. If you take a whole season of first places in Basic, then that's where the decisions comes in as far as whether you're willing to invest more in your abilities and your airplanes if you want to advance.

_____________________________

~Growing Old Is Mandatory~
~Growing Up Is Optional~

(in reply to rm)