Why the AMA is not growing...........  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> Why the AMA is not growing...........
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 3:46:39 AM   
YNOT



Posts: 2062
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Lake Jackson, TX, USA
Status: offline
This is a letter my Father wrote the other day to the AMA.


Steve,
My AMA is 20236 so I have been in the loop for some time, also I am a hobby shop owner for 27 years in the Houston, Texas area and a great supporter of AMA.
The AMA continues to complain about not appealing to the new younger members and continues to try outdated methods to cultivate these younger folks, both male and female. Let's face it, having a model building clinic during the Nats or at Muncie is not going to attract new members. So what's stopping the growth? Try this as a MAJOR problem. The staunchy old AMA members that run families off the flying fields when they show up with one of the new "hobby type" radio control planes sold by companies like Great Planes and Horizon Hobbies, or Wallgreens, or Sam's, or Sharper Image, you get the point.
We try to tell the new R/C flyer about how they no longer have to spend $400 to $500 to be in the hobby, about how the R/C community is a great place for families and youngsters to bond around a common interest, only to have the great disappointment of rudely being asked to leave the field because the don't have an "AMA License". Remember that term "license"? We no longer use that word in the store and tell the customer that is buying a full function trainer that they should join the AMA for the insurance, not because they need a license.
It is incumberent upon the AMA to educate its members that we DO NOT need a license to fly these models.
Per the letter of the law, what about the R/C car groups that run cars at a flying field. One club here in Houston actually has an R/C car track at their field and host events, are they in violation of the AMA guidelines by not insisting that these folks be members of AMA?
Steve, it's really tough to grow the hobby when so many of these old hats are still running things at the local level quoteing antiquated outdated rules that are still on the books at AMA.
We strongly suggest that the new full function R/C flyer join AMA, but he has just spent $400 buying a model and wants to fly. For those situations we put them on a buddy box and fly them until their AMA is processed.
But again, what about the new guys with the $120 to $190 radio control electric aircraft they got for Christmas, and believe me they are being sold by the thousands around the country, are we suppose to run them off or groom them as the future of the AMA. My choice would be to groom them for the hobby, but we can't do that by insisting that they spend almost $50 to join the AMA just to fly a $120 airplane. But I do believe that if treated right most of these folks will want to stay in the hobby, buy a .40 trainer and join AMA. But if we continue to treat them like they don't belong we can not expect them to want to continue in a hobby that does not welcome them with open arms!
So where do these folks fit into the AMA, are they outcast or are they the future? The AMA needs to find a place for them in our organization. Maybe a trial membership, maybe a no magazine membership, maybe anything to not run the folks off for good. Give it some thought, a lot of future menbers are being put at risk of never joining the AMA.
Currently the AMA has a greater pool of future members as in any time in its history, let's not let them get away because we can't or won't move past "the way it has always been done". Times change and so must the AMA!
Thanks for your time,
Ed Dupaquier
AMA 20236
Trains & Planes Toys & Hobbies
Houston, Texas

_____________________________

YNOT, Snap, Flip & Hover,
Tony D
       Post #: 1

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 4:30:49 AM   
tailskid



Posts: 5464
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Tolleson, AZ, USA
Status: offline
"Currently the AMA has a greater pool of future members as in any time in its history, let's not let them get away because we can't or won't move past "the way it has always been done". Times change and so must the AMA! "

Boy ain't that the truth!!!!!!

Jerry

_____________________________

# 93 in Club Saito

(in reply to YNOT)
       Post #: 2

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 6:29:26 AM   
Hossfly



Posts: 3680
Joined: 12/3/2001
From: New Caney, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:


So what's stopping the growth? Try this as a MAJOR problem. The staunchy old AMA members that run families off the flying fields when they show up with one of the new "hobby type" radio control planes //SNIP//

We try to tell the new R/C flyer about how they no longer have to spend $400 to $500 to be in the hobby, about how the R/C community is a great place for families and youngsters to bond around a common interest, only to have the great disappointment of rudely being asked to leave the field because the don't have an "AMA License". Remember that term "license"? We no longer use that word in the store and tell the customer that is buying a full function trainer that they should join the AMA for the insurance, not because they need a license.
It is incumberent upon the AMA to educate its members that we DO NOT need a license to fly these models.


Tony / Ed Dupaquier

While your thesis about the AMA and their old operations may well hold some truths and points for strong consideration, as one of those *staunchy* old guys, I would ask you to reconsider where you place the blame for your perceived problems.

First let's define "license". >>1 a : permission to act b : freedom of action << seems suitable for our AMA purposes. AMA grants a "license" for anyone caring to join AMA to operate within AMA rules, restrictions, organized modeling activity such as competitions, and several other things that may apply, including the insurance plan.
The AMA license -- on your membership card -- is simply that, membership in the organization, and permission for freedom to act within the AMA structure.

While the legislative law may not require a license to fly models, there are organized units within the AMA structure that have every right to require the AMA "license" to fly within any area that they so control. If you are concerned with Scobee Field, you know that Harris County Parks Commission requires the tenant club, Bayou City Fliers, to police that area for AMA membership for all fliers, yet the BCF cannot require membership in the club.

Therefore if BCFs fail to honor that HCPC requirement, there is a very good possibility the facility will cease to exist. Will that help your cause?
quote:


Steve, it's really tough to grow the hobby when so many of these old hats are still running things at the local level quoteing antiquated outdated rules that are still on the books at AMA.


You might be very happy that the "Old Hats" are concerned enough and possess the self discipline to perform the job of insuring the rules are followed. So many of the younger generations have never had to exercise significant self-discipline and would have no trouble creating a situation that will remove a facility from the use of all. It only takes a few bad spots to ruin the apple.

quote:


But if we continue to treat them like they don't belong we can not expect them to want to continue in a hobby that does not welcome them with open arms!
So where do these folks fit into the AMA, are they outcast or are they the future? The AMA needs to find a place for them in our organization. Maybe a trial membership, maybe a no magazine membership, maybe anything to not run the folks off for good.


Ed / Tony: You compromise your position when you allow your emotion to overshadow your lack of knowledge. Trial Memberships (https://www.modelaircraft.org/trialmemberapp.aspx) are available, and Youth (under 19) no magazine memberships are also available.

OTOH please keep the pressure on the AMA EC for updating the programs.

_____________________________

Horrace Cain.
AMA Life L-93, Leader and CD for 45 years

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." George Washington

(in reply to tailskid)
       Post #: 3

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 11:05:17 AM   
PilotFighter



Posts: 1923
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline
The market place has responded to the AMA feilds in this country. A segment of the market has simply said, "no thanks". Not because of something Dave Brown said to them. Not because something that Dave Brown did, or thought or is thinking or about to think. Lets face it, a segment of the people in this hobby are only in this hobby for a couple of years . The parkflyers have grabbed many of those people away. And I still maintain that the population is increasingly urban and that it is very inconvenient for them to drive 30 or 45 minutes to fly. And many of the AMA feilds have moved far to the outskirts of cities to establish safe sites. Catch 22.

_____________________________

turn left, your other left

(in reply to Hossfly)
       Post #: 4

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 11:07:48 AM   
fliers1



Posts: 530
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Lockport, NY, USA
Status: offline
Stating that crashing is all but certain doesn't help bring in newcomers.

Offering instruction only once a week might be another problem.

How about members ignoring newbies and spectators at the field and mall shows?

Perhaps keeping our great hobby/sport a deep, dark secret for the most part might be another reason AMA isn't growing. In fact, we lost over 10,000 members last year.

Could this be another reason: http://www.rc-float-flying.rchomepage.com/RCWeb/Articles/Instructor/instructor.htm

CCR

< Message edited by fliers1 -- 12/31/2004 12:39:13 PM >


_____________________________

www.abchobbyshop.com- information

(in reply to YNOT)
       Post #: 5

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 1:16:18 PM   
Matt Kirsch



Posts: 7009
Joined: 7/5/2002
From: Rochester, NY, USA
Status: offline
Yes, telling prospective pilots that they won't crash (what else are you going to say when they SPECIFICALLY ASK, "Do they crash?" which is a VERY common question), will help boost participation for a while, but it won't help RETAIN those members. They crash, you lied to them, so they're so disappointed and put off that they never come back. Don't give me that line about how, "they wouldn't have stuck with it anyway." BULL. Even today, $400 isn't chump change and for many people, it's still quite a sacrifice. Best to be honest with them and make sure they REALLY want to make the financial committment, rather than LIE to them to make a sale. If it means we lose some prospective one-time members, at least we have our integrity.

(in reply to fliers1)
       Post #: 6

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 1:29:12 PM   
fliers1



Posts: 530
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Lockport, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Matt Kirsch

Yes, telling prospective pilots that they won't crash (what else are you going to say when they SPECIFICALLY ASK, "Do they crash?" which is a VERY common question), will help boost participation for a while, but it won't help RETAIN those members. They crash, you lied to them, so they're so disappointed and put off that they never come back. Don't give me that line about how, "they wouldn't have stuck with it anyway." BULL. Even today, $400 isn't chump change and for many people, it's still quite a sacrifice. Best to be honest with them and make sure they REALLY want to make the financial committment, rather than LIE to them to make a sale. If it means we lose some prospective one-time members, at least we have our integrity.


"Stating that crashing is all but certain doesn't help bring in newcomers"

No one said anything about lying to newcomers, but when asked "Do they crash?" Of course they crash, so do full size planes, but no one tells new full scale pilots that "You will most certainly crash" in the learning process, which is what so many newcomers RC pilots are told.

CCR

_____________________________

www.abchobbyshop.com- information

(in reply to Matt Kirsch)
       Post #: 7

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 3:56:07 PM   
YNOT



Posts: 2062
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Lake Jackson, TX, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hossfly

Ed / Tony: You compromise your position when you allow your emotion to overshadow your lack of knowledge. Trial Memberships (https://www.modelaircraft.org/trialmemberapp.aspx) are available, and Youth (under 19) no magazine memberships are also available.


I just knew either Hoss or JR would chime in on this point

I personally am aware of the trial membership, however my Father was not until I told him, after he sent the letter to AMA. This angered him more. He reads MA on a monthly basis and was unaware of the trail offer and he thinks that the shop should have been notified about it too. Every year AMA sends the store all types of info, however no info on the trail membership.

I understand the reason for AMA membership at sanctioned fields, however I do not think it was the true point of the letter.

Dad's point is two fold. 1- Membership vs License. Most of the signs use the word licence and I have always known it as a license, but its not a license. License implys some form of testing. 2- Be nice to new people. I know there is NO WAY the AMA can do anything about this. However with it would be nice if the AMA did make some form of attempt to educate all members on how deal with new pilots and the ever growing park flyer pilots. Yea, I see the articals in MA here and there about this, however when was the last time AMA contacted the clubs on this? Of the 4 clubs I belong too, 2 of which I am on the BOD, I have never once seen anything from AMA concerning helping/welcoming new pilots to the field.

Just one more thing to bring to AMA's attention.

_____________________________

YNOT, Snap, Flip & Hover,
Tony D

(in reply to Hossfly)
       Post #: 8

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 4:54:27 PM   
jonkoppisch



Posts: 1914
Joined: 12/17/2001
From: Wilmer, AL, USA
Status: offline
Like stated in the article, being an instructor is a long, hard, usually uncompensated job. I've trained for several years, it's usually rewarding but sometimes will make you pull your hair out, lol. Our club 'sponsor's the official club training people (I'm not currently one). They give them free membership. The club recognizes that #1, a properly trained person will most likely not injure themselves or others if they are trained how to operate the aircraft properly and 2, that they will learn much quicker and have more enjoyment from the hobby with proper help. Where I think the ama falls short is that they should 'sponsor' club trainers as well. Why not give official club trainers free ama membership. It would help promote the hobby, encourage safety thru proper training, (isn't that what everyone is going nuts about right now) and bring more people into the hobby as more people would be willing/encouraged to being a trainer. The ama wouldn't be loosing anything as more people would surely join as a result!!!! It would also show appreciation for the trainer personnel, many who give there time, drive long distances to meet with the trainee all with the expenses coming out of their pocket as they enjoy the hobby!!!!

_____________________________

xps and a flash = NO MORE FLASH...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2HxRNgkjpQ

(in reply to YNOT)
       Post #: 9

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 5:35:27 PM   
combatpigg



Posts: 9254
Joined: 11/22/2003
From: arlington, WA, USA
Status: online
With the rising cost of living and huge amount of money that is rapidly leaving our country, you don't need a college degree to see the truth. There are alot of people who come up to me [while I am flying] who tell me they would LOVE to be able to take part, but can't because they don't have the money or time to throw into something that looks like a pretty risky venture. They can see the fun we are having, but the commitment of time and money just isn't there. And I am showing them the extreme low end of the hobby most of the time[C/L and RC combat]. The average guy who could be out there having fun at an AMA field is already $8000 in debt to his credit card company and does not want to rearrange his financial priorities to make room for the AMA. I wonder what would happen if the AMA offered a "rag free" membership? $24 a year for a card and no magazine? I like it.

_____________________________

Led Zeppelin is NOT "old fogie" music.

(in reply to jonkoppisch)
       Post #: 10

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 5:40:09 PM   
jonkoppisch



Posts: 1914
Joined: 12/17/2001
From: Wilmer, AL, USA
Status: offline
I was wondering that also but I think I heard for the ama to keep its non profit status they have to send out some sort of news letter/paper, so they'll probably never let go of the mag

_____________________________

xps and a flash = NO MORE FLASH...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2HxRNgkjpQ

(in reply to combatpigg)
       Post #: 11

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 5:46:51 PM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
YNOT

The by-laws of the AMA include, as a purpose for the existence of the AMA, the following statement in article II, Purposes: “(m) To license model aircraft and fliers thereof for competition.” Although competition is not as big a part of the AMA as it once was, the promotion of competition is still a major reason for the existence of the AMA. Call it a license, a membership or simply an AMA card, as you please. Letting people leave with the impression that the AMA is no more than an insurance company is counterproductive to the AMA. It seems to me that hobby shops, above all other places, have the duty to explain the AMA to customers. Without AMA chartered clubs, many RC focused hobby shops would cease to exist. Explain why it is a license, and go forward.

The subject of trial memberships is one that annoys me beyond reason. The EC made the commitment to trial memberships. Advertising was placed in other magazines, at hobby shows, and the money to promote the new program was spent. Why does it annoy me? The HQ staff, although fully aware of the effort, dropped the ball. The AMA website, which was referenced in the ads was not ready, although there was substantial lead time. The initial reaction to the program had no place to go for fulfillment, not just for days, but for months. Perhaps the new ED, who, among other things, is a previous EC member, will be able to set the priorities of staff members and have those priorities acted upon. Maybe we will see a realignment of resources to reflect the goals set forth by the EC, instead of having those resources redirected by non-staff individuals, who believe the crisis du jour is more important. Certainly, a part of the effort to promote trial memberships could have and should have included hobby shops.

YNOT, you might have your dad contact Sandy Frank, your AMA VP. Dr. Frank has been active in trying to establish programs for indoor park flying, among other things. Sandy asked for volunteers to help sometime back. I posted his request here. Has your shop volunteered? There are a lot of us that would agree that the potential for growth in the AMA exists NOW, in numbers never before seen due to the inexpensive park flyers. You and your dad are on the firing line. You probably have substantially more to do with the way the AMA is viewed than even a club does.

While I do not understand the attitude, and personally oppose it, there are clubs that do not want new members, spectators, or even their existence known. They do not want the AMA telling them how to run their clubs. While there appear, arguably, to be some efforts to tell clubs how to be run, the basic approach has been, and still is, for the AMA to keep their hands off. Telling those clubs they must be nice to newbies would be fruitless, and potentially, counterproductive.

The way we have, as a group, received inquiries has always been suspect. How much? I spent $2000 for this plane alone. How often do you crash? As a new pilot, you will probably crash a lot. Why do I need an AMA membership? Insurance. The simple fact is that we, as individuals, are asked so many times, over the years, that we become calloused to the newbie. It’s going to be hard to change that.

Just as a last thought, you might mention to your dad that contacting the members of the EC might be more effective in changing the operation of the AMA than contacting staff.

(in reply to YNOT)
       Post #: 12

RE: Why the AMA is not growing........... - 12/31/2004 5:51:09 PM   
J_R


 

Posts: 4446
Joined: 1/4/2002
From: Corona, CA,
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: combatpigg

I wonder what would happen if the AMA offered a "rag free" membership? $24 a year for a card and no magazine? I like it.

Difficult to do considering the cost of the mag is somewhere around $8 per member. On the other hand, I gues the rest of us could make up the difference by paying more for our dues.

(in reply to combatpigg)