Grumman Widgeon  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Seaplanes >> Grumman Widgeon Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Grumman Widgeon - 3/4/2005 6:22:03 PM   
Ed_Moorman



Posts: 3678
Joined: 1/5/2002
From: Shalimar, FL, USA
Status: offline
Here's the latest seaplane project from my flying buddy, Carl "Flaps" Laffert. Flaps scratch built it from plans. He found and enlarged from some old control line plans, then he re-designed the construction for RC.

Power: 2 Magnum .52 4-strokes
Finish: Ultracote in Coast Guard colors like the one in the Navy Air Museum in Pensacola.

Ready to test in a couple of weeks after it warms up some more.



Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

Ed Moorman, AMA 553, KD4QBM, Revver Bro #156
R/C Report Magazine, Fun Aerobatics Column
       Post #: 1

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 3/4/2005 7:03:09 PM   
IFlySlowPlanes


 

Posts: 322
Joined: 5/11/2004
From: Reading, PA, USA
Status: offline
Real nice! Stupid question...are those wheels actually retractable or are they just painted on the hull?

(in reply to Ed_Moorman)
       Post #: 2

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 4/30/2005 4:24:12 AM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
I designed and built the first ever RC Grumman Widgeon in 1967. (See Sept 1968 Flying Models Magazine for the construction article -- I think that they still sell my plans.) Won first in flying scale at Brimfield, Mass in 1968. It was about 1/7 scale, two Enya 60's.

Now have a 1/4 scale Widgeon from G&P fiberglass/foam kit. Originally designed by Al Franklin of Gig Harbor, Wash. Two Ryobi 31cc weed trimmer gas engines, 50 lb. 10 ft. span. Won pilot's choice award at the Lake Havasu float fly. My wheels are dummies, but Robart sells a complete scale retract system for the plane.

I have flown this 1/4 scale at several float flies in Southern california, as well as Lake Shuswap in British Columbia and Lake Havasu.
It originally had the Coast Guard color scheme. Everyone building the 1/4 scale was using those colors, so, after an unplanned very hard landing, repainted with a color scheme of a Widgeon at Chino Airport.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to Ed_Moorman)
       Post #: 3

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 4/30/2005 4:35:18 AM   
PeterC


 

Posts: 365
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Status: offline
Great looking Widgeon. I need motivation to finish my Mr G's widgeon. I sure wished the kit manufacturer had worked out some of the details such as attaching the nacels to the wing and setting incedences. I followed the lines on the fibreglass moulding but it looks like I have too much negative incedence in the stab. Post more pictures guys, keep me moving.
Thanks for the jolt.
Peter

(in reply to ellysbro)
       Post #: 4

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 4/30/2005 6:46:18 AM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
Try http://www.jagengines.com/oscart.htm for more details on my quarter scale Widgeon. One photo there shows the nacelle internal structure, which is a plywood box notched into the foam wing leading edge. I used the same approach on my old 1967 1/7 scale, which also had a foam wing. I used the scale wing incidence, about 2-1/2 degrees, but not the scale upthrust of another 2-1/2 degrees. You can see in the picture that the engines point down relative to the wing, probably at 0 degrees to the reference line or tail. Each box contains the firewall, engine mount, fuel tank, CH ignition module, ignition battery, flap servo and throttle servo.

Water taxiing steering is via differential throttle, linked to the rudder stick. The outboard engine on the turn would speed up. It turned on a dime with no water rudder. This was turned off for flight.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to PeterC)
       Post #: 5

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/1/2005 4:33:14 PM   
PeterC


 

Posts: 365
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Status: offline
Your engine mounting is excellent; my problem is that the firewalls are already on the moulded nacells and there is no structure except the fibreglass moulding to support the weight of the engines. Maybe just a lot of trial and error fitting will do it. This is the type of stuff that makes a good kit worth the bucks.
Peter

(in reply to ellysbro)
       Post #: 6

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/1/2005 4:57:35 PM   
Mustang Fever


 

Posts: 1157
Joined: 11/30/2003
From: Cadillac, MI, USA
Status: offline
Has anyone built this one? (RCM, March 1993. Irwin Ohlsson.)

I'm starting to appreciate the Widgeon's suitability for an RC subject. Especially like the inverted inline engines for a scale appearance.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


_____________________________

Bob Hunt

(in reply to PeterC)
       Post #: 7

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/2/2005 6:03:09 AM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
If you compare the Ohlsson Widgeon to the Paul Matt 3-view, you will see that it is not at all scale. All I can say is that these "stretched" Widgeons probably fly better than a scale one, but what is the point? I sent for the plan, but was disgusted with the design, so did not build it. It seems like any flying boat with inverted engines is called a "Widgeon", like some people call any light plane a "Piper Cub". Joe Bridi built a couple of 1/4 scale "Widgeons" recently, which had similar departures from scale.

The Ohlsson "Widgeon has an elongated fuselage, not scale, with rounded corners, not scale. The nacelles have sexy louvers, not scale, and appear to be too close together. I could go on, but again, what's the point?

(in reply to Mustang Fever)
       Post #: 8

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/2/2005 6:11:43 AM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
Yes, the G&P 1/4 scale short kit is worth the bucks, about 1200 of them. You can order it as a "Super Widgeon" conversion, with the flat four nacelles, or as the classic original Widgeon with the inverted Ranger inverted inline nacelles. My molded nacelles are treated as a non-structural covering or cowling, over the plywood box, which is the load-bearing structure.

Your nacelle would probably come out lighter, if you can make it work.

(in reply to PeterC)
       Post #: 9

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/2/2005 6:20:45 AM   
SKYPILOT


 

Posts: 697
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Perris, CA, USA
Status: offline
Guys,

What would you think of the big G&P Widgeon with Super Tiger 4500s for power ??? Lighter than gassers, more powerfull than gassers. I don't care that they'd cost more to run with the nitro, and would'nt run as long on a tank. My problem is, i really don't like gasser engines (now don't flame me on that, it's just my opinion), but i would really like to model this plane in the future, so i'm trying to figure out if theirs an engine option other than gas ?????????

_____________________________

Regards, Scott

(in reply to ellysbro)
       Post #: 10

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/2/2005 5:02:37 PM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
I have agonized a lot over this question. There are a lot of considerations.

1. Light weight engines are good, but you need to keep the tail feathers light, else you will be adding lots of lead to the nose. My original 1/4 scale Widgeon crashed due to flap stall, and the fellow who helped me rebuild used the G&P foam tail feathers and lots of heavy fiberglass and primer. He also arranged things so that I had to put the elevator servos in the tail, hence the rebuild needed more nose ballast in the nose, and it came out six pounds heavier than my first effort, which had built-up balsa tail feathers, and pre-painted Coverite on the wing and tail.

2. I don't think you need an ST4500. The ST3250 sells for $199, and would be more than adequate power. Reliability is another story. I definitely would have on-board glow drivers for reliable idle, and, as you probably know, ST carburetors have a bad reputation, most people replacing them with OS carbs. And any inverted glow engine can suffer the glow plug going out. What you don't want is one engine failing in a twin. The Ryobi's were OK for the 44 pound first try, but the 50 pounder is a bit underpowered. They turn a 16-8 Master Airscrew prop at about 8000 RPM. Bill Price's even heavier Widgeon is underpowered with G38s. I did some bench tests recently, as follows:



JAG Ryobi 31cc, 16-8 Master Airscrew prop, 87 unleaded, 30/1 oil, 8000 rpm, Control-now in Widgeon

Super Tigre 3000, 18-8 Master Airscrew Classic, Performance Plus 15%, 9200 rpm, Perry Carb, custom muffler

OS BGX-1 3500, 18-8 Master Airscrew Classic, Performance Plus 15%, 9700 rpm, No Muffler, well-used

As you can see, even the ST 3000 has much more power than the Ryobi. The ST3250 would be even better, probably as good as the OS, although not tested here. If you can afford them, I would go with the OS BGX-1 3500, a real stump-puller, and reliable as they come.

3. I used the gas engines because they start easily, love to run inverted and are reliable as anything. Also they are very thrifty with fuel, 16 oz. tanks last almost a half hour. This saves weight, as well as cost. The Ryobi's have the carb and muffler behind the cylinder, so they fit nicely into the Widgeon cowls, without even the spark plug showing. Most gas engines have the muffler and/or the carb sticking out the sides of the cylinder. If you do go with gas, consider the new Evolution 52 from Horizon Hobby, or the Revolution 52 from Bisson. Both have less stuff sticking out the sides.

4. Another recent candidate is the new Saito 220, the largest single-cylinder 4-stroker. It should have power to spare.

(in reply to SKYPILOT)
       Post #: 11

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/3/2005 12:08:51 AM   
PeterC


 

Posts: 365
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Edmonton, AB, CANADA
Status: offline
I have to agree with ellysbro on choice of motors; not that I think gas is the way to go but that a ST 3000/3250 would be a better choice. I have a ST 4500 and it must be heavier than a lot of the smaller gas engines. Also with the engines in nacelles closer to the CG a llighter engine is not so bad as you are going to need nose ballast anyway so you may as well put it way up front where it will do some good. The ST 4500 is really a massive hunk of metal and probably way too powerful for realistic flying. Regarding the ST carb I have been running a stock one for years and have had no trouble with it. I always thought the guys put a OS carb on because it was bigger and gave more power. Mine will idle so slowly that you can almost count the revolutions. It also has a bad habit of starting and running backwards almost as well as forwards. Shades of baby bees!
I gave similar advice many moods ago regarding the Ohlson Widgeon; how it could be considered scale is beyond me.
Good thread here, let's hear from others.
Peter

(in reply to ellysbro)
       Post #: 12

RE: Grumman Widgeon - 5/3/2005 4:23:13 AM   
ellysbro


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 10/24/2002
From: Riverside, CA
Status: offline
I have an ST3000, which was used in a Stream Schneider Sport 320 Schneider Racer. We had to take a bushing out of the carburetor to get some power out of it. I think they used the ST4500 carb and resticted it so the ST3000 would idle better. I wound up with a Perry Carb. We also removed the head gasket and opened up the muffler somewhat.

See http://www.stits.com/store/page15.html for more on the G&P Widgeon kit, and more pics of my plane.

Joe Bridi used two G62s in his 1/4 scale. Serious overpower!

I have uploaded some pics of the full scale Widgeon, hangared at Chino Airport, whose color scheme I used.. The happy guy is me. Also some not so hot pics of Bridi's Widgeon.

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize

(in reply to PeterC)