mickey-gem
Posts: 105
Joined: 10/13/2004 From: Littleton,
CO, USA Status: offline
|
Well, I have been using the metal gear HS 81's in many of my electric applications with great results. I am impressed with there torque, size and weight. I wanted to save as much weight as possible all around since I was adding the tail gear components. I replaced the glow throttle servo with the tailwheel servo, and in doing so still saved 4.15 oz of weight all around, 5 servos., (also the weight from The very large dowel pushrod system that came with the kit, probably only one oz. ) I was originally going to use inexpensive Futaba standard servos which weighed 1.5 oz ( .83 0z heavier than the HS 81) and they produced 42 oz of torque so the HS 81's are not far off, which at 4.8 v yield 36.1 oz of torque and at 6.0 v yield 41.66 oz of torque. If you go with the 6V UBEC you will be able to experince the full torque benefit of the very compact servos. Unfortunatley since I needed more weight in the nose I did away with my 6 volt UBEC. Eventually if I get larger capacity packs I can take off the nose weight I added (about 3 0z) and replace it with say 4000 mah packs And my 6 volt UBEC and I should still be at the same weight ( 7 1/2 lbs.) with slightly more flight time. Other scale planes in the size range of the Kadet Senior, generally weigh in at about 8-10 lbs, and their control surfaces are much heavier. The Kadets control surfaces are very light in comparison. By mounting all the servos where I did, the connections are much more solid and the potential for control rod slop and binding are virtually eliminated. Also, I purchased this plane for it's very slow, relaxing flight characteristics, so I was not planning to put to much stress on the control surfaces during flight. I live in Littleton Colorado, I genarally fly in large open soccer fields near my house. I live near Chatfield resevoir which has a very nice AMA sanctioned flying field which I would like to fly at in the near future. Regards, Jesse Regards
|