ilikeplanes
Posts: 1058
Joined: 3/30/2002 From: portland, OR, Status: offline
|
I am a Mechanical engineer. The pot is not marked with a brand name, nor are the components on the pc board. My experience is that "brand name" potentiometers are only used in instrument grade products. A single pot of this type can cost more than an entire servo. The pot is mounted in a cavity molded into the top portion of the servo case. Other details and materials appear adequate for a product of this cost. If I had the extra time and cash, I would do a full blown lab test showing peak torque, peak speed, speed at 1/2 stall torque, step response in both direction, minimum resolution, centering precision, dead-band, and mechanical slop. Of course, the test would have calibrated instruments with a population of components and a statistical analysis of the gathered data. It could also be done with "green" and "burned-in" servos. BTW, I have used servo hydraulics in machinery that I designed for industrial processes. We did a structured test program to determine the difference between Parker and Moog servo hydraulics. The Moog servo valves were far superior to the Parker. In this case, price and a good name does buy you something. I'm not sure if the same applies to model servos. WreckRman2, there is also quite a bit of discussion on the 605BB.
|