MHester
Posts: 2415
Joined: 10/27/2002 From: Woodstock, GA, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Invertedflyby Haven't heard a bad thing about them (except MHester talking about them compared to current pattern ships ) LOL you remember that huh?? Ok then, repeat after me. "A Kaos is a great airplane, a Kaos is a great airplane...ohmmm....ohmmm...." Ok you can have your robe now. Meetings are on Saturdays, and at all swap meets. LOL Ok seriously I've said why they don't stack up to current designs, now let me tell you why it's a better airplane compared to the Skylark (I've owned several of both). The Kaos has a superior wing, area and moment design. It has some slight rudder coupling, but nothing like the skylark. The skylark is a GREAT second airplane, I think seriously I've owned 6 of them. No joke. But when it comes to performace, the Kaos is simply the better plane. No question. The Kaos has a thick double tapered wing, while the Skylark has a constant chord wing with a crapload of dihedral. It's the ultimate low wing trainer. But for the money, if you can successfully put a low wing through it's paces, a Kaos is a better plane and has more potential. Just fly it semi-fast and keep it light. The downside, as you've no doubt already read, is that it's a flying bananna box. The wings are great, but the tail is flat planks and the fuse is a square box. Aerodynamically this ain't the optimum setup. Doesn't mean it's a sucky plane, but compared to say a Widebody, it's definitely an ancient design. But for what you're wanting to do, and the money you're wanting to spend, it'll do. Just practice and burn fuel. Then just wait till you get your hands on your first full blown 2 meter...you'll never look back again -Mike
_____________________________
Owner Custom Airframes of America, Team YS, Mercury Adhesives
|