lsnover
Posts: 629
Joined: 4/29/2002 From: Bath, PA, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: aj and phoenix Many of us "twits" believe that we should get what we pay for and nasty never enters the picture when we do. 5% less wing area and a 14% increase in weight may be OK for some, but the next "Twit" ought to know what they are getting before they shell out $500+. If name calling is sharing in a positive fashion, then I guess I am in the wrong place. AJ: Believing you should get what you pay for is fine. Even stating so is OK, but getting Nasty about it isn't going to help. Did you buy one of John's Yaks? If not, then you have little to complain about, since you can ride the coattails of those of us who plunked down our cash already. If you did, then by all means, state your problems. But we can be civil about it. Unless your being Nasty, I wasn't name calling. If that's your intent, then you can judge whether the shoe fits. I have my issues, some might call them petty, others might not. I am working with John privately to address some issues, and it is my hope that he will make some adjustments for those of us who purchased "sight unseen", and make some corrections and clarifications in his advertising for the benefit of those who have not yet made a purchase. I agree there are some discrepencies in what was advertised and what was delivered. I think ARFs are a relatively new area for John and his business and I'd like to give him some time to work things out. We can choose to act like "twits" while we do this, or act like adults. Cheers! Lee
|