mike early
Posts: 138
Joined: 10/28/2007 From: Ashland, KY, USA Status: offline
|
I isolated every single variable. Including a shorter tube for that application that was to open air. I did the water test on both nipples and there is, in fact some pressure on that far end nipple. (Not nearly as much as the front one. The front one can push almost 8" of water out and the back one about 2-3) But I can also watch the oil moving through the tube. It has no effect on the speed of the oil droplets exiting the tube. I tell you, the mess comparison is night and day. I would happily sacrifice a couple hundred RPM for the zero mess aspect. But, it really cannot be seen on the tach. I didn't have the correct sized allen head wrench to fix the servo linkage for my retracts so I couldn't fly it today, damn. The weather is gonna be terrible all weekend. Anyways, I ran two more tanks through it today since I couldn't fly it, I experimented more with the needles. I am pretty sure the needles are at a good setting on both the LS and HS. It idles at 2000 and doesn't hesitate when transitioning to WOT. It immediately hits the redline at 8200, or lower if I richen up a few clicks so it maxes at 8000. The elbow, the flex exhaust, the stock muffler, the stock muffler with the 90, the crank vent connected or not, different glow plugs, etc. All isolated and have nothing near the effect I am needing. I was looking at other engines...and I remember why I chose this one. The claimed power/weight ratio is unparalleled in any other 4 stroke. Just not observed. P.S. The water test on the crank vent would be 100" or more, I'd imagine.
< Message edited by mike early -- 5/17/2008 2:21:04 AM >
|