RE: RC turbo design problems...  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Cars, Buggies, Trucks, Tanks and more >> RC Car Engines >> Car Nitro & Gas Engines >> RE: RC turbo design problems...
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/1/2006 8:41:51 PM   
richardneail


 

Posts: 56
Joined: 10/30/2004
From: , UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
I am interested and sorry if I missed this in the previous posts but whaty engine have you put the turbo on?

Also how much would one cost

Rich

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 76

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/1/2006 9:54:21 PM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
I've tested it on sevral O.S. engines and the traxxas 2.5, but it will fit almoast any engine. The price for a full kit should be about $150.

(in reply to richardneail)
       Post #: 77

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/2/2006 9:00:42 PM   
richardneail


 

Posts: 56
Joined: 10/30/2004
From: , UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
I was interested how the fueling works as I have a FG gas powered car and the fuel system on these isnt pressurised from the exhaust system, it is pumped out of the tank.

Rich

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 78

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/3/2006 12:01:46 AM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
On typical nitro-powered rc's the pressure line running from the tuned pipe to the fuel tank is replaced by a pressure line from the turbo and a check valve in the pressure line regulates pressure in the tank. A custom setup would have to be developed for your application.

(in reply to richardneail)
       Post #: 79

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/4/2006 4:51:24 AM   
coloradokurtis


 

Posts: 12
Joined: 1/16/2006
From: Navarre , FL, USA
Status: offline
I think that this is a great idea it would be nice if a company would help back your funding. keep up the good work. How old are you. do you have any old mopars or just dreaming. Good luck w/your project. I have a xx 69' Daytona. lol. a pic. on my wall.

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 80

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 3/4/2006 9:10:54 PM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
I'm 19. I own a '70 roadrunner I'm restoring, it's not much to look at now but once it's done it'll be a mid-10 sec. car at the strip.

(in reply to coloradokurtis)
       Post #: 81

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/12/2006 8:21:50 PM   
vroomtiss


 

Posts: 2
Joined: 4/12/2006
From: , FL, USA
Status: offline
sounds interesting. very interesting..

what are your thoughts on cooling for the turbo? are you thinking of making a intercooler?

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 82

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/17/2006 5:10:10 AM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
The machining cost involved with creating a separate mini-intercooler to include in the kit would be impracticle at this scale, but a simple alternative that would work just as effectively would be to machine cooling fins into the turbo housing itself. I doubt it will become part of the basic kit, but it might become a design feature in a 'race-only' version for competition use that would incorpirate sevral other design ideas I wanted to put into the basic design but couldn't for economy purposes.

(in reply to vroomtiss)
       Post #: 83

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/19/2006 7:06:55 AM   
vroomtiss


 

Posts: 2
Joined: 4/12/2006
From: , FL, USA
Status: offline
sounds good.

i just thought that it would be pretty bad ass to have an actual working fmic.

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 84

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/20/2006 12:34:07 PM   
bobdole



Posts: 47
Joined: 2/2/2006
From: latrobe, PA, USA
Status: offline
im new to this post but i found a liquid cooled car with a turbo. check out [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_3080259/anchors_3080259/mpage_1/key_turbochargers/anchor/tm.htm#3080259][/link]

(in reply to vroomtiss)
       Post #: 85

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/20/2006 7:26:48 PM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
I wasn't able to open your link but I think I found that thread. Cool project, looks like alot of people are starting to make their own turbos, I wish I had more time to put into promoting mine but school and work take up most of my time.

(in reply to bobdole)
       Post #: 86

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/21/2006 12:56:33 AM   
Brother_Dust


 

Posts: 109
Joined: 2/12/2004
From: , MT, USA
Status: offline
sounds interesting, I have an idea for an intercooler... A radiator for a liquid cooled computer. I have the link right here. http://www.frozencpu.com/ex-rad-71.html -

http://www.frozencpu.com/scan/se=Water%20Cooling/se=Radiators/mp=menu_search.html

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 87

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/21/2006 12:04:11 PM   
bobdole



Posts: 47
Joined: 2/2/2006
From: latrobe, PA, USA
Status: offline
RB Innovations makes a fan for a heat exchanger cooling head.you might be able to get it to blow air on the turbo somehow. they also have nitrous you could inject that into the turbo to cool the air down and the nitrous will give it more power .http://www.rbinnovations.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/23/products_id/70?osCsid=d0c04fa08ca539384d890b4c2237b297

(in reply to Brother_Dust)
       Post #: 88

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/22/2006 2:01:38 AM   
soarrich



Posts: 2340
Joined: 2/1/2002
From: Middletown, NJ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moparman1
By the way, does ANYONE have suggestions on how to strengthen my turbine castings?

A few years ago I read about ceramic turbo rotors, I think Ford was experimenting with them. They where cheap to cast, and took very hi temps well, you might want to check it out.

_____________________________

Rich Border

(in reply to Moparman1)
       Post #: 89

RE: RC turbo design problems... - 4/22/2006 5:01:25 AM   
Moparman1


 

Posts: 68
Joined: 9/16/2005
From: Denver, CO, USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the input everyone, it's always good to hear new ideas:

'brother dust', I don't think those cpu radiators are air tight, but they would make excellent radiators for the engine itself and at $45 they're in the right price range. With a few mods I bet I could get them to hold some boost, thanks for the link, I'm going to get one and see what I can do to it.

'bobdole', I don't plan to include an external cooling system in the turbo kit because it seems to stay within 20 degrees of the engine's temp even after running for sevral hours on end. I'm not a big fan of rb's products, but the cooling fan they're selling looks like a pretty good idea. The only concern I have is that it's always running and if the engine becomes too cool the internal clearances would change and thus potentially damage the engine, but if it were hooked it up to a thermometer programmed to turn the fan on when the engine began to overheat you could run it all day without having to watch the temp.

'soarrich', I've already solved the turbine's strength problems by using 'consumable-mold' castings instead of die casting. Cons. mold casting opened up my choice of metals enough that I was able to cast them out of brass, iorn or aircraft-grade aluminum which eliminated the problem of advanced bearing-land wear on the turbine after extensive use. The problem with ceramic turbines is that they're extremely brittle compared to metal turbines and they have poor heat dissipation charachteristics, which is why they're rarely used in production vehicles. After I test the turbines made of iorn and brass for durability I'll decide which material will offer the best compromise between strength and wear characteristics to use in my turbos.


< Message edited by Moparman1 -- 4/22/2006 5:25:46 AM >

(in reply to soarrich)