RE: Savage SS vs. Revo  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Cars, Buggies, Trucks, Tanks and more >> RC Monster Trucks >> Traxxas Monster Truck forum >> RE: Savage SS vs. Revo
Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/21/2006 4:52:42 PM   
AznBash3r


 

Posts: 1321
Joined: 5/27/2005
From: Niles, IL, USA
Status: offline
litle kids....

(in reply to BAMF90)
       Post #: 401

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/21/2006 4:54:24 PM   
BAMF90



Posts: 1381
Joined: 8/8/2005
From: Morton Grove, IL, USA
Status: offline
And what are you?

(in reply to AznBash3r)
       Post #: 402

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/21/2006 9:59:48 PM   
Harvick


 

Posts: 571
Joined: 7/6/2005
From: , IL, USA
Status: offline
OK Stop all this crap!!!!! I started this thread, and If you have not noticed my other threads, I HAVE BOUGHT A REVO 3.3 !!!!!!!! It is a roller, I get to pick my own engine. (which is great, cause I hate the 2.5 and 3.3's) So is it the best? Not sure, I do know I am happy and even after reading all the bickering back and forth on this thread I ended up with the Revo 3.3

(in reply to BAMF90)
       Post #: 403

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/21/2006 11:24:01 PM   
BAMF90



Posts: 1381
Joined: 8/8/2005
From: Morton Grove, IL, USA
Status: offline
Get the 3.3 engine.

(in reply to Harvick)
       Post #: 404

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 12:01:48 PM   
Kawasakirider


 

Posts: 657
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: sydney/queensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BAMF90

quote:

A 3.3 engine is a POS, I'd much rather have a 4.6 engine. The 3.3's rear bearing dies very quickly, if it doesn't and u get to the 2-2.5 gallon mark the conrod will split at the gidgeon pin OR you will lose compression around 3 gallons if your lucky. The 3.3 isn't a great performer IMO, the 18 tm can beat it in torque and keep up with it in top speed and the Revo 3.3's wide ratio gearing is to much for the engine, it bogs when it hits second gear and takes to long to wind out. Stock for stock, the revo is a better truck, a savage is either a full blown out racer that doesn't get more than 4 ft of air or it is a savage, destined to go to some club days and live its life in the air.



Now thats what I call BULL$#!T. First of all have you ever even owned a 3.3? If you have then you would know how good of an engine it actually is. Sure, it's not the best engine out there, but for the price, you can't beat it! And if you even try to say that it can't beat a TM in a race, then I call that BS again, because you know what, I can bet you've never seen a 3.3 go against a TM. I race my dad's friends Revo with a TM vs. my Revo with a 3.3 every Sunday, and you know who wins? I DO! And no it's not because I am the better driver because he can drive too, but it's because the 3.3 is built for both power and speed. Also one more thing, I'm sure I might be jynxing something here, but I might as well let you guys know, I'm almost at the 4 gallon mark on my 3.3, and guess what, NO PROBLEMS SO FAR. Another thing, you said the 3.3 bogs down with wide ration gearing, well guess what, wrong again. NOT IF YOU FRIGGEN KNOW HOW TO TUNE. Hope this clears everything up for the 3.3 VS. TM.


You have no idea what you're on about bud. The 3.3 would win against a 2.5r with an 18 tm because of the wide ratio, in saying that the 3.3 DOES bog down. The 3.3's price is stupid for what it is. It's $160 in stores, the 18 tm is $180. The 18 tm has more torque and top end than the 3.3 if you have them in the same truck set up exactly the same, want to know how I know? Because I have 3 friends with revo's and they have a friend with a 2.5r and a 3.3 in it. If you want to make the bet about me never seeing the race, go ahead put on a big one, because all you will be doing is handing your money over to me. You listen to when a revo 3.3 with the 3.3 changes gears, it bogs down and takes to long to wind out. The wide ratio is to much for both of these engines in question, but the OS is a better engine in reliability, power, ease of use and durability. Go to www.traxxas.com and read all the threads that are titles "my 3.3 grenaded on the 2 gallon mark, I am experiences, traxxas better warranty this". Get your facts straight you loser, the 3.3 is a POS engine.

(in reply to BAMF90)
       Post #: 405

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 2:56:31 PM   
ssj2



Posts: 2222
Joined: 10/12/2005
From: Niles, IL, USA
Status: offline
quote:

You have no idea what you're on about bud. The 3.3 would win against a 2.5r with an 18 tm because of the wide ratio, in saying that the 3.3 DOES bog down. The 3.3's price is stupid for what it is. It's $160 in stores, the 18 tm is $180. The 18 tm has more torque and top end than the 3.3 if you have them in the same truck set up exactly the same, want to know how I know? Because I have 3 friends with revo's and they have a friend with a 2.5r and a 3.3 in it. If you want to make the bet about me never seeing the race, go ahead put on a big one, because all you will be doing is handing your money over to me. You listen to when a revo 3.3 with the 3.3 changes gears, it bogs down and takes to long to wind out. The wide ratio is to much for both of these engines in question, but the OS is a better engine in reliability, power, ease of use and durability. Go to www.traxxas.com and read all the threads that are titles "my 3.3 grenaded on the 2 gallon mark, I am experiences, traxxas better warranty this". Get your facts straight you loser, the 3.3 is a POS engine.

Uh oh

_____________________________

Mugen MBX5T Prospec
92% of teens have switched to rap music if you are part of the other 8% put this in your sig

(in reply to Kawasakirider)
       Post #: 406

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 5:50:30 PM   
BAMF90



Posts: 1381
Joined: 8/8/2005
From: Morton Grove, IL, USA
Status: offline
quote:


You have no idea what you're on about bud. The 3.3 would win against a 2.5r with an 18 tm because of the wide ratio, in saying that the 3.3 DOES bog down. The 3.3's price is stupid for what it is. It's $160 in stores, the 18 tm is $180. The 18 tm has more torque and top end than the 3.3 if you have them in the same truck set up exactly the same, want to know how I know? Because I have 3 friends with revo's and they have a friend with a 2.5r and a 3.3 in it. If you want to make the bet about me never seeing the race, go ahead put on a big one, because all you will be doing is handing your money over to me. You listen to when a revo 3.3 with the 3.3 changes gears, it bogs down and takes to long to wind out. The wide ratio is to much for both of these engines in question, but the OS is a better engine in reliability, power, ease of use and durability. Go to www.traxxas.com and read all the threads that are titles "my 3.3 grenaded on the 2 gallon mark, I am experiences, traxxas better warranty this". Get your facts straight you loser, the 3.3 is a POS engine.


First of all, I would just like to tell ssj2 to be quiet, because if you have nothing better to say then "uh oh" stay out. 3.3 does not bog down. If you know how to tune, then all is good. And guess what, you said a 3.3 can only beat a TM with the wide ratio, well I have the standard ratio, and I STILL beat my dad's friend who has the .18TM and he has the wide ratio. I would rather buy an OS .18TM for the price, but I really like my 3.3. I have had no problems with it. Once this one does die though, I am getting the TM. I have owned an OS motor in the past, 2 of them, and they were very reliable. I'm just saying not to call the 3.3 a piece of crap because it's not. It keeps up with TM's all day, and power wise, mine still flips on its lid at the 4 GALLON MARK. My dad's friend has 4 gallons through his TM and his doesn't pull wheelies that often anymore. So just let it go. The 3.3 and TM are both very good engines, Traxxas just has to learn how to make their engines last longer.

EDIT: I forgot to add that about a month ago when my dad's friend and I were racing, we didn't even have time to make one run because his connecting rod snapped. Now, I hope this clears up that not only the 3.3's rod snaps.

< Message edited by BAMF90 -- 11/22/2006 5:56:42 PM >

(in reply to ssj2)
       Post #: 407

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 7:01:20 PM   
RCtmaxx18


 

Posts: 3
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: Edmonds, WA, USA
Status: offline
the revo is racing savage bashing..

(in reply to BAMF90)
       Post #: 408

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 8:36:06 PM   
BAMF90



Posts: 1381
Joined: 8/8/2005
From: Morton Grove, IL, USA
Status: offline
HAHA, yeah right. Revo is both. Savage is almost niether. You can bash a Savage hard, and it'll still break. They are over rated. Revo's are tougher then Savages.

(in reply to RCtmaxx18)
       Post #: 409

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/22/2006 11:49:08 PM   
Kdog3.3


 

Posts: 98
Joined: 11/11/2006
From: Amherst, OH, USA
Status: offline
This has to take the record of most replys to a subject. To those who think the 3.3 is a piece of crap, i would like to share this with you. I have a tmaxx2.5 with a 3.3 and i dont tune good at all. barely moved the needles from breakin. I went to the track one day running it so rich it takes about a tank for it to warmup. Once it did it was flying. I was going down the straightaway keeping up with a xtm mammoth st. I have stock everything. The mammoth was stock but it had the 24.7 big block. The guy driving it new how to tune it and everything. Dont tell me it still is a piece of crap. and by the way, the3.3 never reached 200 degrees. Think about that Also I think the revo is better

(in reply to BAMF90)
       Post #: 410

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/23/2006 12:18:39 AM   
ScRacing



Posts: 1623
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: gardiner, MT, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kdog3.3

This has to take the record of most replys to a subject. To those who think the 3.3 is a piece of crap, i would like to share this with you. I have a tmaxx2.5 with a 3.3 and i dont tune good at all. barely moved the needles from breakin. I went to the track one day running it so rich it takes about a tank for it to warmup. Once it did it was flying. I was going down the straightaway keeping up with a xtm mammoth st. I have stock everything. The mammoth was stock but it had the 24.7 big block. The guy driving it new how to tune it and everything. Dont tell me it still is a piece of crap. and by the way, the3.3 never reached 200 degrees. Think about that Also I think the revo is better



lol, thats great that you cold d othat and the revo is the only monster truck that can keep up with a truggie, but the XTM mamoth is easily beat. Overall, hte 3.3 makes more power then the 18 tm.

_____________________________

All men die, but few men actually live
Are you alive? im looking for gasser

(in reply to Kdog3.3)
       Post #: 411

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/23/2006 2:03:20 AM   
Kawasakirider


 

Posts: 657
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: sydney/queensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
To the guy that runs his engine cold, that is not good for it, specially the trx engines. Lean it out.

(in reply to ScRacing)
       Post #: 412

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/23/2006 2:06:10 AM   
Kawasakirider


 

Posts: 657
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: sydney/queensland, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline
Dude, I don't care how much of a good tuner you are, unless u have a nice long straight, the 3.3's wide ratio gearing is to much for a small block engine (I still class the 3.3 as a small block) even though people say it is a mid block.

(in reply to Kawasakirider)
       Post #: 413

RE: Savage SS vs. Revo - 11/23/2006 2:35:48 AM   
ScRacing



Posts: 1623
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: gardiner, MT, USA
Status: offline
Well rc car action test said that the revo goes like 41 mph stock and the savage did 32mph.

_____________________________

All men die, but few men actually live
Are you alive? im looking for gasser

(in reply to Kawasakirider)
       Post #: 414