bbbair
Posts: 815
Joined: 1/7/2003 From: Belleville,
ON, CANADA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: can773 quote:
ORIGINAL: Sharpy01 The problem with the property owner in the case of this event, is whether or not the airport where the event is happening is listed/recognized as a flying site by a sanctioned MAAC club. Unless things have changed, the club they invented for the event has not received club status from MAAC. However, if an established club in the area that has sponsored the event has the airport listed with MAAC as one of their flying sites, then the owner should be covered. Should not matter if they are listed/registered or whatever.....provided they have the permission of the landowner. As a MAAC member its my understanding that you can fly in any location with permission of the landowner as long as you follow your safety rules and local bylaws etc. Now if anyone reads the ad it would appear that further insurance has been aquired above and beyond MAAC. If this is not the case then MAAC should really be clarifying this information on their site for all. I dont think anyone on any of these threads has pointed out the benefit of sanctioning other than for record keeping/MAAC Mag ad.....certainly I cannot remember anyone indicating that its required for insurance...otherwise all flying events in this country would require sanction (which we all know doesnt happen). Oh My, Chad but you have left yourself open here ... most uncharacteristic of you... #1. "Should not matter if they are listed/registered or whatever.....provided they have the permission of the landowner." If that is the case then why do we fill in those evil MAAC forms each year giving locations of our club fields and ensuring that they meet the current safety codes? #2. I dont think anyone on any of these threads has pointed out the benefit of sanctioning other than for record keeping/... Be careful with this one it is that same arguement that has been used to try to get us to drop FAI affiliation. #3 To the best of my knowledge the CAC HAS NOT been granted any official club status within the MAAC organization - so that means they are just a bunch of guys having a Fun Fly somewhere in Ontario. Whether they have insurance from MAAC is in serious doubt ... which would explain why they tell you that they have arranged for separate coverage - in Lieu of MAAC...? So if they are not holding a MAAC sanctioned event, then they do not have to meet MAAC safety codes or receive approval... so what standards are they working too, and who would recognize any awards that they grant? Would MAAC cover a person if they had an incident at an UNSANCTIONED event? #4. Has anyone heard what happened to the ~$2,100.00 that was declared as surplus from the 05 Nat's? Hmmm lots of questions - few answers. FYI - My Club hosts an annual Fun Fly, we are accountable to no one but our members for fianancing, but we MUST receive MAAC sanctioning for the event in order for MAAC insurance to be in effect.
_____________________________
It's Time to Kick the Tires and Light the Fires!
|