Monocote or ultracote??

Monocote or ultracote??
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Questions and Answers >> Monocote or ultracote??

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 7:18:22 PM

Posts: 35
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: bellingham, WA, USA
Status: offline

I am just about ready to cover my GP ultimate and am wondering which one to go with. I have used monocote on previous planes but havent tried ultracote before. Which one is better or easier to work with? It seems to me that ultracote has more color options. Thanks for any thoughts.
Heavythumbs

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 7:31:11 PM

Posts: 7405
Joined: 1/21/2002
From: Acworth, GA, USA
Status: offline

Ultracote is easier to work with and is lighter. Monocote is thicker and a bit more durable.

(in reply to heavythumbs)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 7:58:53 PM

Edwin

Posts: 3201
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Leander, TX, USA
Status: offline

I thought it was the other way around, but it dont matter. Ultracoat. Once you use it you wont go back to moneykote.
Edwin

(in reply to Sport_Pilot)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 8:39:36 PM

Posts: 1072
Joined: 12/16/2003
From: Anderson, MO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

I thought it was the other way around, but it dont matter. Ultracoat. Once you use it you wont go back to moneykote.

...until you get a roll that wrinkles everytime the sun comes up. The blue Ultracoat I used on my Seniorita needs reshrunk every time I fly it and I must be very careful not to have the seams lift while doing it. It is much easier to apply than Monokote, so I would say it is a draw. Money wise they are about the same, avg. $11-12/ 6ft. roll, which Monokote is 3" wider (more covering). Monokote wins the color selection by a long shot.

_____________________________

Had I known that flight was going to cost me $100 per second, I wouldn't have flown 30 seconds!

(in reply to Edwin)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 9:06:57 PM

Posts: 276
Joined: 3/19/2002
From: Springfield, IL, USA
Status: offline

Both are excellent coverings. MonoCote is actually a bit lighter in weight, despite the "feel". UltraCote works at much lower temps so it is easier to apply. I much prefer Ultra, but Mono does win the "shine" competition by a mile. Both are very strong and durable. If you are happy with your application using MonoCote, You'll LOVE Ultra.
My .02 worth after covering over 100 planes. :-)

_____________________________

AMA#4939

(in reply to bhole74)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 9:21:01 PM

Posts: 798
Joined: 6/13/2005
From: Antelope Valley, CA, USA
Status: offline

I used exclusively monkote for years, until I tried ultracote. Now I use strictly ultracote. Mono goes over curves easier, but if you plan your covering process well; ultra is just as good IMHO.

_____________________________

Kelvin "Mods" Verrett
www.MRM-RCModels.com

(in reply to spuck5644)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 9:45:07 PM

Posts: 19094
Joined: 4/22/2002
From: Willmar, MN, USA
Status: offline

I haven't met the curve that MK does better than UC.

Here are my obsevations:

MK has more colors.

UC is more durable (It's a bit more "Rubbery" and less prone to breaking, where MK is more brittle and will pop open easier)

Trim Solvent works on MK, but not on UC

I don't care what anybody says - BOTH COVERINGS WRINKLE - get used to it

If there's a difference in shine, I sure don't see it.

The next two are the BIG differences:

UC beats MK hands-down when it comes to applying it. It shrinks more and it stretches more.

MK's adhesive is more permanent than UC. This is a pro and a con for BOTH.

Example. If you iron down a wrinkle in MK, it will be there forever - unless you replace the covering - But removing MK can be a bear if it's been on for a while. In this situation, this is not good

With UC, you only have to add heat, and it will peel right off. In this situation, this IS good

But if you are trying to tighten an area near the edge of the covering by heating it, MK's adheasive will not allow the edge to be pulled in as easily as UC.

So you see how the different adhesives can be good or bad.

My preference is to use Ultracote because it is SOOO much easier. If I need to heat close to a seam, I just protect the seam with a wet paper towel.

< Message edited by MinnFlyer -- 12/16/2005 3:35:51 PM >

_____________________________

Mike B.
AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com

"Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." - Groucho Marx

(in reply to Mods-R-Me)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 9:51:59 PM

Posts: 3759
Joined: 3/8/2005
From: x, , USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwin

I thought it was the other way around, but it dont matter. Ultracoat. Once you use it you wont go back to moneykote.
Edwin

Really? MONOKOTE is WAY better than ultracroak.

Here's the two most recent planes I've covered. The Kaos is all MONOKOTE and the Telemaster is all MONOKOTE except for the gold. When I was putting on the Ultracroak, it would distort on me. It lost most of it's ability to stick quickly, and it was just a major pain. It shrunk so much that I couldn't keep it's shape when spanning a hinge gap. There's NO way that Ultracroak is better.

Woops

Attachments

Click to see fullsize image.

Click for fullsize

Click to see fullsize image.

Click for fullsize

_____________________________

Model Airplanes don't kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.
Christopher A. Todd AMA# 637636

(in reply to Edwin)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 9:59:23 PM

Posts: 19094
Joined: 4/22/2002
From: Willmar, MN, USA
Status: offline

woops, your name says is all.

Your iron was too hot.

UC uses a lower temp than MK

_____________________________

Mike B.
AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com

"Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others." - Groucho Marx

(in reply to 50%plane)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 11:10:29 PM

Posts: 927
Joined: 1/13/2002
From: NWest, IN, USA
Status: offline

They both are a PITA....

(in reply to MinnFlyer)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/14/2005 11:24:43 PM

Posts: 1018
Joined: 4/28/2004
From: Ţo, FINLAND
Status: offline

I like Ultracote, or "oracover" as it's named here in Europe.
I also tried Monocote, but as a beginner builder I just find Ultracote more forgiving and easier to apply...
The paperbacking is also good imo because it's good to draw patterns on and also it comes off very easy. The Monocote's plastic backing can sometimes be hard to peel off.

So far, I'm all Ultracote/Oracover

(in reply to BBW Walt)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 1:00:35 AM

Posts: 3759
Joined: 3/8/2005
From: x, , USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MinnFlyer

woops, your name says is all.

Your iron was too hot.

UC uses a lower temp than MK

What temp do you use? With or without a sock?

Woops

_____________________________

Model Airplanes don't kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.
Christopher A. Todd AMA# 637636

(in reply to MinnFlyer)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 1:38:39 AM

Posts: 333
Joined: 1/28/2004
From: Round Rock, TX, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: woops

What temp do you use? With or without a sock?

Woops

I've just done my first application of UltraCote and simply followed the instructions:

Apply to the frame at the 200 degree temp at which the adhesive activates. With a sock add 10 degrees.

I shrunk with the iron at the 300 degree temp. that shrinkage is supposed to begin. It shrunk as I moved the iron over it. With a sock, ditto, add 10-15 degrees.

Really an easy covering to apply. I bought a thermometer for the iron so as to be able to get accurate temp. readings. This stuff works as advertised. I've enjoyed the process of working with it.

Instructions also say that if it starts to sag, reshrink at a slightly higher temp. than before. This I won't know until the plane goes to the field.

Folks in the know say you do have to watch shrinking near seams because they can pull back. My covering scheme hasn't had me face that issue yet.

BobbyG

(in reply to 50%plane)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 1:58:44 AM

Posts: 35
Joined: 4/4/2005
From: bellingham, WA, USA
Status: offline

Sounds like I will give that ultracote a try... to apply a stripe or one color over another can I use the windex method?

(in reply to BobbyGee)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 2:02:20 AM

Posts: 1072
Joined: 12/16/2003
From: Anderson, MO, USA
Status: offline

quote:

I don't care what anybody says - BOTH COVERINGS WRINKLE - get used to it

This is very true. However, in MY experiences, I have found Monokote wrinkles after a day in the sun, Ultracoat wrinkles just sitting in my hangar. I can iron it out every day (UC), sitting in a conditioned office, then have to do it again in the morning. BTW, there is more MK in a 6 ft. roll, another + for MK.

_____________________________

Had I known that flight was going to cost me $100 per second, I wouldn't have flown 30 seconds!

(in reply to MinnFlyer)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 3:16:58 AM

Posts: 1909
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Houston, TX, USA
Status: offline

It seems for the first few season changes, my models, (covered with Monokote) will need a little touch up ironing. But once the models are two or three years old, the coveing seems to stablize or something. Every now and then I will notice a few wrinkles and take out the iron. But for the most part Monokote is very stable.

_____________________________

turn left, your other left

(in reply to bhole74)

RE: Monocote or ultracote?? - 12/15/2005 3:57:06 AM

blw

Posts: 4422
Joined: 3/15/2004
From: Auburn, AL, USA
Status: offline