RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting
Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 4/5/2007 10:29:43 PM   
Not24



Posts: 999
Joined: 12/7/2002
From: Gloucester, VA, USA
Status: offline
I agree with everything he said. And I second that opinion.

Mine probably would have begun to run better had I used this approach. I was so interested in fixing it first, that I didn't allow it time to seek its own level. I know the carb was a drastic improvement over the stock one, but running "acceptable" wasn't good enough for me. I wanted perfect. I'm darn close to that right now. Close enough to not have tinkering with that engine on my list of things I have to do.

_____________________________

Fly it till you break it!

(in reply to Ed Cregger)
       Post #: 526

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/7/2007 8:10:58 PM   
RCPAUL


 

Posts: 626
Joined: 12/15/2001
From: Gahanna, OH, USA
Status: offline
I have followed this thread since its inception. And, I think it is one of the better threads on RCU. I'm amazed at the range of experience that so many have had with this engine.

Well, this Christmas I received an ST 2300 and during the last two weeks I've bench run it on three occasions - today was the third. I've burned less than 1/2 gallon of Wildcat 15%, 18% oil with 3 ounces of castor added. I initially ran the engine on the ST plug it came with but changed to an OS F today. (I use OS F plugs in all my super tigers.) I initially used an 18 x 6 wood prop but changed to an APC 17x8 today.

Today I got 8600 on the APC (I still may be running a little rich) and had it idling at 2000 (I did go as low as 1800 but felt more comfortable at 2000.) Transition is excellent!

I found the high-speed needle to be very broad and the idle needle very sensitive - a change of as little as 1/16 turn on the idle can make a very noticeable difference!

This is more bench running than I usually do on a new engine - I usually run them till I get a reasonable idle then fly to break them in.

I know it needs more break in but I'm more than happy with it.

I'm now looking for a plane to put it in.

Paul

< Message edited by RCPAUL -- 5/7/2007 8:12:06 PM >


_____________________________

Gosh, model airplanes are not a matter of life and death --- they're more important than that!

(in reply to Not24)
       Post #: 527

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/7/2007 9:48:00 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10683
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: offline
Paul, I finished breaking in my 2300 today and using Fox 5%/20% castor it turns a Mejzlick 18x8 at 7,900, the stock carb is linear and stumble free. The compression really came in during todays (2) 16oz runs. The 2nd tank was 8 oz of the Fox/20% castor and 8 oz of WildCat 5%/16% 80/20 syn/castor blend. Hopefully it will be a Diesel before the end of the week. I did the whole break in using the stock plug.

_____________________________

"I have gone faster backwards, upside down and on fire than most people have gone at all" Don Garlits

(in reply to RCPAUL)
       Post #: 528

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/7/2007 10:45:47 PM   
Not24



Posts: 999
Joined: 12/7/2002
From: Gloucester, VA, USA
Status: offline
Good to hear success stories like those. I love my 2300, and love it even more with a Slimline pitts muffler! Last time out it had the new muffler, the other was a Bisson. To be honest, I didn't tach the engine. I set the high speed needle by ear and left the low speed alone. It was a little rich on the low end, but it barely hesitated at all. The HS was intentionally set about 700 rpm (guessing here) on the rich side. With that muffler, the engine sounds like a 50 cc gas burner. Not overly loud, but powerful sounding.

The engine was running so good I ran out of gas and had to deadstick.

Still using the vp 30 pump and 15% omega. Magnum 91/1.08 carb, and MA 16-10 prop. I'll put that engine up against any 1.20 2 stroke or the 1.50 Saito any day.

_____________________________

Fly it till you break it!

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 529

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 12:58:59 AM   
MikeRuth



Posts: 290
Joined: 3/6/2006
From: Tarzana, CA, USA
Status: offline
Well I have read ll of this and not piped in as of yet, because frankly I did not have any information that was factual. Well I have some facts now.

1. My initial break in on a bench stand proved difficult until I discoverd the muffer pressure fitting had a piece or junk in it, not allowing any presure on the tank.
2. The OEM plug gave out after one run, basicly, that plug could not handle rich settings. Put in a OS F
3, bench run a gallon through it on a 18-6 APC prop.
4. Mounted it up in a Excelleron 90 and performed adjustments before heading out for the maiden flight.
5. The maiden went well, I didn't ask for much from the engine, just had to do a little trimming on the plane, but found my self climbing almost uncontrolably until I brought it down to 1/3 stick. Whew, we have power in a 10.25lb plane.
6. Had some dead stick issues although I was not blaming the engine as this mounting goes aganst all the recomended set up of this engine. When Up right engine inverted, carb nipple is low to the center line, when inverted the nipple is way to high. But I still tried some adjusting and got it to run a full tank through. Reliable? maybe
7. Yesterday we had some pretty strong winds blowing, maybe 20 -25 MPH with some gust above that. Not my favorite weather, but I decided on a flight anyways.
Took off all was well, but I found I really wasn't happy with the gustyness of the wind, so I set up and made a quick pass to feel it out for landing, I noticed the throttle was at a very fast idel, I went to full throttle and then cut it back, and it was wide open, after a couple of wild laps I decided to hit the CUT switch and see, nothing, still wide open. Now mind you this plane is over powerd by a bunch, so when flying up wind it was halling balls, and then down wind, well, lets say I was definelty in the Quickie 500 game.
this went on for about 5 or 6 minuets, all the time the air frame is getting the crap knocked out of it, as the wind is buffeting around up and down like a freakin yo yo. Looked like I had a serious radio problem. Well I was the only one in the sky, and a pilot was coming out, I yelled at them to hold on and the did. It finally ran dry and I had a non eventfull landing.

Getting a look at things, I see the throtle arm is broken, well that explains it! right? Nope, tried to move the barrel and it was frozen solid full open. After removing all the hardware and removing the body, it took several good blows to knock the barrel out. Seems as though a small piece of metal lodged in top of the groove that the set screws rides in to hold the barrel. I'm talking small, and it was not from the set screw, it is in perfect condition. Were this came from I have no Idea. I tore down the carb before break in and then had more than a gallon and a half of fuel through it before this happened. So very strange!

I orderd a perry 5002 carb and a vp-30 pump today, hopefully the ring and sleeve are ok. It now feels a little down on compression, although I had set it up rich on that last flight, but man thoose down wind runs had to let that baby really unload. So it's possible. I'll pull it and inspect it later this week.

(in reply to Not24)
       Post #: 530

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 1:52:42 AM   
Trollmaster



Posts: 375
Joined: 4/16/2007
From: USA, USA
Status: offline
Mine performs better everytime I take it out

_____________________________

300 Posts! Time to change my name again!

(in reply to MikeRuth)
       Post #: 531

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 3:41:41 AM   
Not24



Posts: 999
Joined: 12/7/2002
From: Gloucester, VA, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MikeRuth,

but man thoose down wind runs had to let that baby really unload.


The airplane doesn't know the wind is blowing. It runs the same rpm in any direction, regardless of the wind. The only thing that will unload the engine is a dive. This isn't the first time I've heard of a throttle sticking on this engine. Just one more reason to go with a different carb.

_____________________________

Fly it till you break it!

(in reply to MikeRuth)
       Post #: 532

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 5:31:16 AM   
Trollmaster



Posts: 375
Joined: 4/16/2007
From: USA, USA
Status: offline
As much as I hate to drag this out again, I beg to differ a bit here. If I understand this right, your saying that a plane unloads the same with a head wind as a tail wind and that the only way it will unload is in a dive? Am I missing something here?

< Message edited by Trollmaster -- 5/8/2007 5:32:54 AM >


_____________________________

300 Posts! Time to change my name again!

(in reply to Not24)
       Post #: 533

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 9:08:52 AM   
XJet


 

Posts: 3462
Joined: 3/31/2003
From: Tokoroa, NEW ZEALAND
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Trollmaster

As much as I hate to drag this out again, I beg to differ a bit here. If I understand this right, your saying that a plane unloads the same with a head wind as a tail wind and that the only way it will unload is in a dive? Am I missing something here?


That's dead right. Once a plane is in the air the wind has no effect (apart from turbulence).

You may get the impression that the engine is revving faster on a down-wind pass but that's down to the increased doppler shift created by the higher ground-speed.

The plane is still flying at exactly the same airspeed and the engine is doing the same RPMs, regardless of whether it's heading into the wind or downwind.


_____________________________

When I'm not here, I'm at RCModelReviews

(in reply to Trollmaster)
       Post #: 534

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 12:49:30 PM   
buzzingb


 

Posts: 1512
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Bruce, MS, USA
Status: offline
Regardless of wind or dive or climb, you will not overrev this engine. It is rock solid and tends to have a limit on rpm due to tuneing. However I haven't tried it with anything less than a 17X6 but I have ran it wideopen in all realms of flight on a Funtana 90 with many gallons through it now.

_____________________________

Buzz

(in reply to XJet)
       Post #: 535

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 1:52:36 PM   
Trollmaster



Posts: 375
Joined: 4/16/2007
From: USA, USA
Status: offline
Yeh I missed it, it was late, Your talking rpms here.

_____________________________

300 Posts! Time to change my name again!

(in reply to buzzingb)
       Post #: 536

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/8/2007 5:21:05 PM   
MikeRuth



Posts: 290
Joined: 3/6/2006
From: Tarzana, CA, USA
Status: offline
Well I'm not going to dispute anything about the engine unloading or not, but I will say again, that the air frame took one heck of a beating in that buffeting wind. Kudos to the contruction of the Excelleron 90


My perry carb and pump are on the way.

Tearing down the engine to inspect today.\

Mike R

(in reply to Trollmaster)
       Post #: 537

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/9/2007 1:59:01 AM   
buzzingb


 

Posts: 1512
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Bruce, MS, USA
Status: offline
If you were running the 18X6 prop on the plane through all this you didn't even get it up to good operating rpm. This engine can handle all the rpms you can throw at it with a 17X4, even on down lines and keep coming back for more. The 18X6 is large enough to keep the engine from getting into serious rpms even if you climb as high as you can and point it at the ground and open it wide open. You are much more likely to do damage taking it apart and reassembling it needlessly.

_____________________________

Buzz

(in reply to MikeRuth)
       Post #: 538

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 5/9/2007 2:35:26 AM   
Trollmaster