RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting
Page: <<   < prev  23 24 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 11/15/2007 4:30:36 PM   
BillS


 

Posts: 3048
Joined: 9/6/2004
From: Greensboro, NC, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Not24


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillS

Not24,

Have you experimented with the length or the end taper of the low speed needle. The idle needle appears to be 1mm music wire pressed into a brass holder. Larger slide carbs always have a tapered needle controlling the mid range mixture (3/8 to 3/4 throttle or so). A longer needle with a slightly tapered end would be reasonably easy to make but maybe difficult to accurately control the taper.

Bill




No, and I'm not going to either. The end of the ls needle is flat and sharp. The metering slot has the required taper to graduate the fuel flow. The other way to adjust the fuel flow in various throttle positions is to change the slot in the barrel. ST tried this once, and messed things up pretty well. The straight slot seems to work the best.

When time permits I will make a couple of pointed low speed needles to determine if mid range control can be achieved. I'll solder or press the needle into the brass holder.

Might try pointed needles first on a different .45 engine that is being tested now and suffering from rich mid range.

I have also attempted to dump low rpm muffler pressure to atmosphere using a "T" and restrictor but the results are fuzzy.

Bill

(in reply to Not24)
       Post #: 726

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 3:02:15 AM   
Wingspam


 

Posts: 127
Joined: 12/29/2005
From: fort worth, TX, USA
Status: offline
In a 3d style plane, like the Giles or Katana in the weight 12 - 13 lbs. wing span of 72". Would the 2300 provide the power I need ?
Also what prop would you suggest?

Thanks

< Message edited by Wingspam -- 1/24/2008 3:03:07 AM >



_____________________________

Wingspam

(in reply to BillS)
       Post #: 727

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 11:28:11 AM   
tsyssa


 

Posts: 484
Joined: 2/10/2006
From: Meriden, CT, USA
Status: offline
Pullout would not be a rocket ship...but it would likely pullout okay.

The prop you would want to use would be a 17 x 6 or 18 x 6 (Xoar or APC) to have enough thrust. If you go with a higher pitch you would not have the thrust...

_____________________________

Best regards, Todd Syssa
Syssa Aircraft Performance (860) 538 - 2937

(in reply to Wingspam)
       Post #: 728

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 3:19:20 PM   
buzzingb


 

Posts: 1511
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Bruce, MS, USA
Status: offline
17X6 is all it can handle for sport or 3D. It would even be a little better to have a 17X4 for fast revup.

_____________________________

Buzz

(in reply to tsyssa)
       Post #: 729

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 3:29:21 PM   
tsyssa


 

Posts: 484
Joined: 2/10/2006
From: Meriden, CT, USA
Status: offline
a few years ago, I had a 17 x 4 and it really was no fun...
I pretty much used a 17x6 exclusively....it gave the best all around pull and performance. It was in a Funtana though...so that may be different.

_____________________________

Best regards, Todd Syssa
Syssa Aircraft Performance (860) 538 - 2937

(in reply to buzzingb)
       Post #: 730

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 4:14:51 PM   
asmund


 

Posts: 1902
Joined: 11/20/2005
From: Floroe, NORWAY
Status: offline
Any tach numbers on those 17-6 props????????

(in reply to tsyssa)
       Post #: 731

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 5:50:37 PM   
tsyssa


 

Posts: 484
Joined: 2/10/2006
From: Meriden, CT, USA
Status: offline
Checking my records...I used to get 8800 rpm at 80 degrees at 800 ft asl
I did do a few mods to mine, namely sleeved the carb....check in this forum for tsyssa and mods

My memory is fuzzy as I do not do anything glow anymore...everything is all gas with me now...and not going back.

_____________________________

Best regards, Todd Syssa
Syssa Aircraft Performance (860) 538 - 2937

(in reply to asmund)
       Post #: 732

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 1/24/2008 6:10:55 PM   
buzzingb


 

Posts: 1511
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Bruce, MS, USA
Status: offline
I get about 9000 with apc 17X6 and it probally is best pulling prop for engine the 17X4 probally won't pull as strong but will rev up faster if you want to 3D. I have mine on a Funtana also. Couldn't say for sure but the overall pull of 17X4 is gong to be much less, but I haven't tried 17X4, but I have tried 18X6 and it is too much even though the 2300 will pull it. Not24 reports good results with 16 inch prop, read post here.

< Message edited by buzzingb -- 1/24/2008 8:42:49 PM >


_____________________________

Buzz

(in reply to tsyssa)
       Post #: 733

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 2/1/2008 12:38:56 PM   
bps



Posts: 698
Joined: 10/16/2002
From: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Status: offline
any thing new?


_____________________________

JEB

(in reply to buzzingb)
       Post #: 734

RE: My 2300 only likes one prop - 2/26/2008 9:04:45 PM   
rmossesq


 

Posts: 13
Joined: 5/29/2003
From: Anaheim, DE, USA
Status: offline
I have had quite a bit of sucess with both the 3000, the 3250 and the 2300 from super tigre over the past 15 years. I have two 4500s but have never mounted them on an airframe (gonna do's you know). The problem that every one is having is quite simple. When you have a tank that is over 16-20oz the fuel level change between full and empty is dramatic to the carb do to gravity. That having been said, I bet some of you are using even larger tanks which makes the problem worse.

Start the engine on the ground at a perfect setting and it will go lean in 5-7 mins in the air because of the fuel level drop. This is why back pressure is so critical to these engines as it helps pushing fuel to the carb against gravitya s the level drops and the carb to the fuel level gets steeper and steeper. Gravity is to blame, not the plug or the muffler. In most cases the engine will stop after about 2/3 of the fuel is gone cause these engines are so thristy they won't spend any time running lean and burning up in the air like a smaller engine would - they just stop all of a sudden.

Unfortunately, must of us fly arfs now and the engine and tank location(s) and postion(s) are decided for us by the manufacturer. In almost all cases, the tanks are too low, particularly when you get to tanks over about 16oz.

I know what some of you are saying already, "But I have another brand of engine and never had a problem". That is because not all engines are the same. Some engines are designed by the factory to have much better fuel draw then others. OS engines are a great example, they normally trade a little peak power for good fuel draw in all of there engines as well as easier overall handling. Super Tigre over the years has tried to make their engines have better fuel draw by modifying the carb venturi size repeatedly, but then when they get the venturi to the size that draws well, people complain that the peak power is down, so they tend to go back to the larger throat carbs. A small venturi 3000 will make the same power as a 2300 and is significantly larger and heavier.

I have always mounted my ST's on the side so that the carb is in line with the top 1/3 of the tank at the least, and in line with the center of the tank if possible. Yes, it will siphin when the tank is full and the engine is stopped, but you just have to use a clamp in the fuel line to the carb to stop that. Another big help is a perry pump with backplate pressure. This will solve all of your problems, but you will have to fiddle with the needles once the pump is installed (Don't adjust the nut on the pump - ever!). I have run a 2300 on back plate pressure alone very sucessfully (There is a huge difference in back plate pressure vs muffler pressure if you have never tried it - huge!). Others run the 7D OS carb on the St's. This is unnecessary in my experence and the 7D is touchy to needle settings when used this way to me, but some like it. They say that the transition is much better and the idle is more steady (Which is true, they really idle nice and pick up instantly with the 7D). If you are swapping the 7D for a narrow throat St carb, there will be a significant increase in top end power also.

If you are mounting any of the big tigres rightside up, you are asking for problems. The tank will be too low 99% of the time. Incidentally, the big MDS engines have the same problem. To get an MDS to run really well, use a perry Pump off of back plate pressure and get rid of the machined carb and run the cast (Later version) carb. Run it rich for at least 30 mins on the ground before trying to fly it. It will swing an 18x10 almost 9,000 rpm on all that cheap old fuel that has been sitting in your garage for years and never quit or wear out.

Another trick is to use a hopper tank, a small one oz tank that is fed by the main tank, but that is mounted on the firewall close to the carb. This fools the carb into thinking that the fuel tank is in line with the carb. Ducted fan pilots used this trick for years as they had the same problem and it worked just fine.

Hope that this helps.

(in reply to Flyer95)
       Post #: 735

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 3/11/2008 6:03:04 PM   
vasek



Posts: 1993
Joined: 1/24/2002
From: centre, QC, CANADA
Status: offline
I need an inverted muffler for the G2300

I swear I saw a CMPro P-40 build where there was a ST G2300 installed inverted with a Slimline Inverted Pitts muffler (?). But I can't find ANY inverted muffler on the TH site. Is there one?

_____________________________

I am a proud Canadian >living in Europe;-)

(in reply to rmossesq)
       Post #: 736

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 3/12/2008 5:27:53 PM   
turbo.gst


 

Posts: 252
Joined: 2/22/2005
From: Midland, TX, USA
Status: offline
vasek,

try http://www.slimlineproducts.com/online_shop/inverted_pitts.htm

turbo

(in reply to vasek)
       Post #: 737

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 3/12/2008 6:09:39 PM   
vasek



Posts: 1993
Joined: 1/24/2002
From: centre, QC, CANADA
Status: offline
Thanks turbo!

_____________________________

I am a proud Canadian >living in Europe;-)

(in reply to turbo.gst)
       Post #: 738

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 3/12/2008 9:16:16 PM   
Ed Cregger



Posts: 7736
Joined: 1/31/2002
From: Ringgold, GA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BillS


quote:

ORIGINAL: Not24


quote:

ORIGINAL: BillS

Not24,

Have you experimented with the length or the end taper of the low speed needle. The idle needle appears to be 1mm music wire pressed into a brass holder. Larger slide carbs always have a tapered needle controlling the mid range mixture (3/8 to 3/4 throttle or so). A longer needle with a slightly tapered end would be reasonably easy to make but maybe difficult to accurately control the taper.

Bill




No, and I'm not going to either. The end of the ls needle is flat and sharp. The metering slot has the required taper to graduate the fuel flow. The other way to adjust the fuel flow in various throttle positions is to change the slot in the barrel. ST tried this once, and messed things up pretty well. The straight slot seems to work the best.

When time permits I will make a couple of pointed low speed needles to determine if mid range control can be achieved. I'll solder or press the needle into the brass holder.

Might try pointed needles first on a different .45 engine that is being tested now and suffering from rich mid range.

I have also attempted to dump low rpm muffler pressure to atmosphere using a "T" and restrictor but the results are fuzzy.

Bill




------------


You can more easily control the midrange mixture by altering the spiral groove that is machined in the carb barrel. Pe Reivers did a lot of research on this exact subject a few years back. His articles are still available.


Ed Cregger


_____________________________

Artisan

"Flying models since the Fifties - I'll get the hang of this yet!!!"

(in reply to BillS)
       Post #: 739

RE: ST2300 Testing and Experimenting - 3/29/2008 7:56:04 PM   
whatwheel



Posts: 234
Joined: 6/9/2004
From: salina, OK, USA
Status: offline


Did I just miss it in this ''event'' or has any one thke a stock 2300 carb and compair the way its made to one of these''better carbs''?

Were not talking about a suttle launch here I may be wrong but it looks like a person could tell the way both carbs are built and see what is going on.

Thanks ,Glenn.

_____________________________

[center]
<