DarZeelon
Posts: 6983
Joined: 4/9/2003 From: Rosh-Ha'Ayin, ISRAEL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: jaka Hi! Dar...the reason manufacturer does this is Performance! You can actually have more performance from an engine if you choose the right glow-plug for that engine/prop/rpm/fuel/elevation combination. Let me take an example. When I race in Q-500 pylon with my Webra .40 GT (Swedish Q-500 rules)I use a Rossi 3 glow-plug which I think is the best plug for max rpm in that engine using 80/20 fuel, at sea level swinging a 10x6 prop at around 14,000rpm. This plug is also what comes delivered from Webra but Webra calls it No 3. But this is not the plug I would choose if I wanted the utmost reliability...then I would choose an Enya 3 or OS 8 glow-plug and run the engine on 5% nitro. Regards! Jan K Sweden Jan, I can argue with none of what you wrote in that post. But it is all a matter of using a plug of the right heat range. And there is no reason whatsoever to use a hotter glow-plug then the engine needs, for a properly timed ignition, at a stoichiometric fuel-air ratio. That is, unless you need to run the engine richer than necessary, like during the break-in of this engine. The OS-Japan glow plug page does state, the A3 is suitable for break-in of all glow engines. ...But after actual break-in is completed, there is absolutely no need, or advantage, to run the engine much richer than stoichiometric (only a small safety margin richer). So using the correct heat plug is the preferable way to go. And, BTW, the Enya equivalent of the OS #8 plug is their #4, not #3. The #3 is hotter. I was also wrong for a while about this plug...
_____________________________
Dar Zeelon - ISRAEL - ddzeelon@gmail.com MVVS - Jett - Nelson - Bolly - Mejzlik
|