AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag

AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

This thread is locked

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> M.A.A.C. >> AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 6:42:09 PM

Sharpy01

Posts: 600
Joined: 9/9/2003
From: Kenora, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

Well, just received my lastest MAAC Mag and it's loaded with AGM stuffs. All the recommendations and resolutions that will be dealth with, plus the most detailed financial statements I have ever seen posted by the association and the proposed by-law rewrite.

With regard to resolutions. (those items that actually change constitution/bylaws):

Even I'm a wee bit surprised by the number of resolutions dealing with the removal/revoking of directors/membership/committee members etc.

#'s 3, 7, 9, 10, 12,13, 15, (There are 19 in total)

These come from more than one zone and the gist of most of them sound like:

"7. Be it resolved that any membership may be suspended up to 90 days or terminated, by a 2/3rds majority vote of the board of directors provided that the conduct of the member is found to be prejudicial to the corporation. The member shall have an opportunity, upon written notice to the president of the corporation within 30 days after formal notification, to show cause why his membership should not be suspended or terminated. "

Gee, I wonder why this has become a hot-button issue in recent times?

Post #: 1

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 8:29:55 PM

sivlE

Posts: 82
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: windsor, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

I was at the last AGM and what gets my goat is that the ZD proposes all of these issues including the one about letters of aplology puts them to vote and then claims that they are acting in accordance with the requirements Sw zone membership. Maybe they should have secret votes rather than a show of hands, that way people can vote the way they really want to instead of being scared to vote against the ZD's BS.
Just my opinion.

(in reply to Sharpy01)

Post #: 2

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 8:33:12 PM

DSLarkin

Posts: 136
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Picton, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

One can get excited over this, and it's fun to stir people up, but the reality is that for these resolutions to have been put forward - the initiative must have been taken quite a time ago - before the current gerfuffle. As far as I know, this was just something we should always have had in our by-laws but didn't.

(in reply to Sharpy01)

Post #: 3

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 10:24:55 PM

mustang one

Posts: 35
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: tillsonburt, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

sivlE Date 2/13/2006 8:29:55 PM
I was at the last AGM and what gets my goat is that the ZD proposes all of these issues including the one about letters of aplology puts them to vote and then claims that they are acting in accordance with the requirements Sw zone membership. Maybe they should have secret votes rather than a show of hands, that way people can vote the way they really want to instead of being scared to vote against the ZD's BS.
Just my opinion.

It was in your power to call for a secret ballot, it appears you did not. why blame others for something you did not do

(in reply to DSLarkin)

Post #: 4

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 10:59:26 PM

Jabba

Posts: 69
Joined: 1/27/2004
From: Windsor, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sivlE

I was at the last AGM and what gets my goat is that the ZD proposes all of these issues including the one about letters of aplology puts them to vote and then claims that they are acting in accordance with the requirements Sw zone membership. Maybe they should have secret votes rather than a show of hands, that way people can vote the way they really want to instead of being scared to vote against the ZD's BS.
Just my opinion.

First John it was an AZM not a AGM that is coming, you should go.

NEXT I doubt that you or any other SW zone member is SCARED to vote!!!

PLUS your WRONG on who made the motion about the aplology, it came from a member of YOUR CLUB, (my club too) NOT from me, Chuck, or Gerry.

< Message edited by Jabba -- 2/13/2006 11:01:36 PM >

_____________________________

Jabba

(in reply to sivlE)

Post #: 5

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/13/2006 11:15:02 PM

mustang one

Posts: 35
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: tillsonburt, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

This guy sivil really gets a lot of things wrong

(in reply to Jabba)

Post #: 6

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 12:20:19 AM

britbrat

Posts: 3299
Joined: 6/15/2004
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stateofmind

This guy sivil really gets a lot of things wrong

Considering that you can't even spell his name, who are you to pass enlightened commentary?

(in reply to mustang one)

Post #: 7

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 12:50:43 AM

Propworn

Posts: 51
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: Canada
Status: offline

Ever notice that Jabba and Stateofmind dance in tandem. One posts and the other seems to back him up. Or one gives someone a shot and the other chips in like a sock puppet.

Could you guys answer a question why the proxies and the registration for the zone meeting sivle is talking about have never been turned in to MAAC head office though this stuff has been asked for several times?

EH Palmer Eh Chuckie?????????????????

(in reply to britbrat)

Post #: 8

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 1:02:49 AM

Propworn

Posts: 51
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stateofmind

It was in your power to call for a secret ballot, it appears you did not. why blame others for something you did not do

This turkey would have us believe he is from somewhere other than Tillsonburg looks like some one is having a hard time keeping anything straight any more. Sneaking around in the shadows with your super hero tights on backwards man doncha know the potato is supposed to go in the front not the back. Not the sharpest pencil in the box are ya?????????????

< Message edited by Propworn -- 2/14/2006 1:04:21 AM >

(in reply to mustang one)

Post #: 9

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 1:27:39 AM

Jason Holdaway

Posts: 139
Joined: 4/25/2004
From: Strathroy, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Propworn
Could you guys answer a question why the proxies and the registration for the zone meeting sivle is talking about have never been turned in to MAAC head office though this stuff has been asked for several times?

EH Palmer Eh Chuckie?????????????????

Hadn't heard that one. Maybe they haven't finished rewriting it yet to suite their needs....errr......I mean the wishes of the zone.......as they believe them to be.

(in reply to Propworn)

Post #: 10

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 4:38:22 AM

Sharpy01

Posts: 600
Joined: 9/9/2003
From: Kenora, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

Noted absent in the lastest MAAC mag was any SW zone report ...........nor a scale committee report?

None submitted?

....or was it a matter of content?

It seems bad form not to submit anything in the face of all the controversy centered around the current leadership there. It would further be incredibly bad form, and disturbing, not to submit AZM proxies if that is fact?

(in reply to Jason Holdaway)

Post #: 11

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 1:18:28 PM

sivlE

Posts: 82
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: windsor, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Stateofmind

sivlE Date 2/13/2006 8:29:55 PM
I was at the last AGM and what gets my goat is that the ZD proposes all of these issues including the one about letters of aplology puts them to vote and then claims that they are acting in accordance with the requirements Sw zone membership. Maybe they should have secret votes rather than a show of hands, that way people can vote the way they really want to instead of being scared to vote against the ZD's BS.
Just my opinion.

It was in your power to call for a secret ballot, it appears you did not. why blame others for something you did not do

Yes you are absolutley correct, I could of called for secrect ballot. The reason I did not is because I was unaware at this time of all of the politics going on and thought that the membership would do the right thing and not be pressured into voting the way the ZD wanted. Again I was wrong it seems eh?

(in reply to mustang one)

Post #: 12

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 1:24:39 PM

sivlE

Posts: 82
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: windsor, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jabba

quote:

ORIGINAL: sivlE

I was at the last AGM and what gets my goat is that the ZD proposes all of these issues including the one about letters of aplology puts them to vote and then claims that they are acting in accordance with the requirements Sw zone membership. Maybe they should have secret votes rather than a show of hands, that way people can vote the way they really want to instead of being scared to vote against the ZD's BS.
Just my opinion.

First John it was an AZM not a AGM that is coming, you should go.

NEXT I doubt that you or any other SW zone member is SCARED to vote!!!

PLUS your WRONG on who made the motion about the aplology, it came from a member of YOUR CLUB, (my club too) NOT from me, Chuck, or Gerry.

Palmer that is NOT the way I remember it. Maybe that is the way in which is was recorded in the minutes. I think that at the next AZM I might bring a camera crew and tape the whole thing so the people who are absent can draw their own conclusions.

(in reply to Jabba)

Post #: 13

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 3:48:37 PM

mustang one

Posts: 35
Joined: 1/31/2006
From: tillsonburt, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

Sivile is once again accusing the SW ZONE of running an incorrect zone meeting. For the record, the October 16, 2005 SW Zone meeting Was conducted in the proper manner according to the bylaws of MAAC and the procedures outlined in Kerr and King.

ALso for the record, John please stop vilifing me on these web sites, For the record,

Jason, there was no theft of 2000 dollars.

Charles Smith
SW Zone Director

(in reply to sivlE)

Post #: 14

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 4:01:04 PM

Propworn

Posts: 51
Joined: 7/24/2002
From: Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mustang one

Sivile is once again accusing the SW ZONE of running an incorrect zone meeting. For the record, the October 16, 2005 SW Zone meeting Was conducted in the proper manner according to the bylaws of MAAC and the procedures outlined in Kerr and King.

Charles Smith
SW Zone Director

Well the $2000 plus was declared as profit at the AZM why was it not handed in to MAAC?

As long as the proxies and the voter registration for that zone meeting have not been handed in to MAAC as required by Corporations Canada and requested by MAAC how can you claim a correctly run zone meeting???

Why is there nothing in the MAAC mag from you, our zone director or from you, as scale chairman? I would think this issue of all issues leading up to the AGM would be the one that should not be ignored. Maybe you are spending too much time defending and promoting the defunked CAC which by the way you claim not to have an interest in to do your primary job that you were elected too.

< Message edited by Propworn -- 2/14/2006 4:06:54 PM >

(in reply to mustang one)

Post #: 15

RE: AGM Resolutions from Feb MAACmag - 2/14/2006 4:58:08 PM

Sharpy01

Posts: 600
Joined: 9/9/2003
From: Kenora, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mustang one

Sivile is once again accusing the SW ZONE of running an incorrect zone meeting. For the record, the October 16, 2005 SW Zone meeting Was conducted in the proper manner according to the bylaws of MAAC and the procedures outlined in Kerr and King.

ALso for the record, John please stop vilifing me on these web sites, For the record,

Jason, there was no theft of 2000 dollars.

Charles Smith
SW Zone Director

Welcome. Good to see some light in the shadows.

Are we now able to clear up a couple of matters?

I haven't noticed any answer to a couple of outstanding questions. To start, how about dealing with a couple directly from this thread?

1. What was the profit of the 2005 NATS and where are those funds currently located? I don't think anyone seriously considers that such funds were "stolen". More a matter of personality headbutting and hard feelings.

2. Have the proxies from your AZM been submitted to MAAC HQ?

(in reply to mustang one)