RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how?  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Glow Engines, Gas Engines, Fuel & Mfg Support Forums >> Glow Engines >> RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how?
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 1:24:26 PM   
britbrat


 

Posts: 3299
Joined: 6/15/2004
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: The_Pipefather

quote:

ORIGINAL: britbrat

Uh --- Pipefather -- VE means Volumetric Efficiency. Don't you just hate when that happens -- you know -- suddenly the other guy's argument actually means something?


No it still doesnt mean anything. If VE is indeed volumetric efficiency, you dont get volumetric efficiency increases with an open exhaust as opposed to an untuned silencer, which is exactly what I said at the end of my previous post.

Kweasel, I have noticed that stock aircraft glow engines (atleast the couple I have had the chance to measure) have somewhat mild timing, on the exhaust side, compared with bigger engines. This may have something to do with the fact that actual port timing is less important than port time-area. Do notice that most glow engines have bridged exhaust ports which can be made very wide relative to the bore. So a milder timing can be used to make the engine more docile as far as idle and part-throttle efficiency is concerned, while still enabling a high gas throughput at higher rpms.



Go back and actually read what Dar said. Use all of the words.

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 26

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 1:35:35 PM   
The_Pipefather


 

Posts: 97
Joined: 11/16/2005
From: Mysore, INDIA
Status: offline
Going back and actually reading ALL of his words, I found that this is what he said:


quote:

A good tuned exhaust will typically increase VE and torque by 15-20%, over the open-exhaust numbers and by about 25-30% over a regular silencer (RPM by 10-15% higher).


I may be wrong, as my knowledge of English is rather elementary, but he is saying that tuned exhausts give a bigger improvement over the regular silencer (25-30%) than with the open exhaust (15-20%). That is, he is saying that open exhaust has better VE and torque compared to a regular silencer.

Have I used all the words & do my posts make sense? Never mind if they dont. Cause this discussion is serving no purpose other than to marshall more and more opinion against me, the poor newbie who is supposed to ask questions like "D-Uh, I got an OS and I dont know the glow plug from the backplate", as opposed to talking about gas flow and Doppler anemometry.

(in reply to britbrat)
       Post #: 27

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 2:24:24 PM   
Hobbsy



Posts: 10513
Joined: 12/2/2001
From: Colonial Beach, VA, USA
Status: online
Pipe, your English is far better than a lot of my fellow Americans and you use capitals and puncuation accurately.

_____________________________

"I have gone faster backwards, upside down and on fire than most people have gone at all" Don Garlits

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 28

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 5:05:26 PM   
Jim Thomerson



Posts: 2787
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Austin, TX, USA
Status: offline
The best way to hop up an engine is to add cubic dollars. Send it to someone who knows what they are doing and let them fix it up for you.

(in reply to Hobbsy)
       Post #: 29

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 6:26:58 PM   
britbrat


 

Posts: 3299
Joined: 6/15/2004
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The_Pipefather

Going back and actually reading ALL of his words, I found that this is what he said:


quote:

A good tuned exhaust will typically increase VE and torque by 15-20%, over the open-exhaust numbers and by about 25-30% over a regular silencer (RPM by 10-15% higher).


I may be wrong, as my knowledge of English is rather elementary, but he is saying that tuned exhausts give a bigger improvement over the regular silencer (25-30%) than with the open exhaust (15-20%). That is, he is saying that open exhaust has better VE and torque compared to a regular silencer.

Have I used all the words & do my posts make sense? Never mind if they dont. Cause this discussion is serving no purpose other than to marshall more and more opinion against me, the poor newbie who is supposed to ask questions like "D-Uh, I got an OS and I dont know the glow plug from the backplate", as opposed to talking about gas flow and Doppler anemometry.



You are not wrong because of your English, but because you are partially technically incorrect.

An open exhaust can certainly have a higher exhaust gas velocity than an untuned muffler & often does. There may be fortuitous times in an engine's operating regime when an "untuned" muffler exhibits tuned behaviour, but on average this is not the case.

As you very well know, 2-stroke engines are extraordinarily sensitive to exhaust backpressure. A truly untuned muffler results in excessive backpressure, lowering exhaust header gas velocity (relative to an open header), thus reducing scavenging & VE. Both a resonant volume ("tuned" ) muffler, and a tuned length & volume pipe can rectify this problem in a specific RPM band, by either inducing low-pressure pulses at the exhaust port, resulting in higher gas velocity & improved scavenging, or by inducing carefully timed high-pressure pulses at the port, resulting in a pseudo-supercharging effect & hence, higher VE.

An untuned muffler can do neither. In an untuned case, it is more beneficial to have minimum backpressure, as would result from an open header. Dar is quite correct in what he said. He is also inadvertantly in error where fortutitous circumstances conspire to cause an untuned system to accidentally result in either a low, or high-pressure pulse, with the correct timing & magnitude. The chances of that happenning with any usefull regularity are quite slim.


< Message edited by britbrat -- 3/9/2006 8:42:34 PM >

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 30

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 7:39:41 PM   
proptop



Posts: 4451
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: Rome, NY, USA
Status: offline
Here's an article some of yaz might find interesting...

http://www.rccaraction.com/articles/htpporting_1.asp

I have done the outside of several sleeves, putting a radius on the lower lip of the ports, and adding guide channels...
It works...

_____________________________

It's bad luck to be superstitious...
Revver Bro #77

(in reply to britbrat)
       Post #: 31

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/9/2006 8:36:33 PM   
asmund


 

Posts: 1870
Joined: 11/20/2005
From: Floroe, NORWAY
Status: offline
all this tuning talk triggered my interest. I have done porting to many of my buggy engines, but never an aeroengine. well I just did the outside sleeve porting on my asp xls 52. I camfered all around the lower part of the sleeve and camfered and added guide channels to the intake ports on each side of the exhaustport. the intakeport right across the exhaustport was camfered from the factory, so I left that one alone. While I was at it I also removed one of the two headshims to raise compression because I will try to run some faI fuel.It all took just half an hour. I will run my engine by the weekend and compare tachreadings to my previous results. I`m very exited about this and will be very happy if I gain 2-400 rpm.If not successful I will put back in the headshim and run my regular 15/15 fuel and compare again.

(in reply to proptop)
       Post #: 32

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 2:28:58 AM   
The_Pipefather


 

Posts: 97
Joined: 11/16/2005
From: Mysore, INDIA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: britbrat

As you very well know, 2-stroke engines are extraordinarily sensitive to exhaust backpressure. A truly untuned muffler results in excessive backpressure, lowering exhaust header gas velocity (relative to an open header), thus reducing scavenging & VE. Both a resonant volume ("tuned" ) muffler, and a tuned length & volume pipe can rectify this problem in a specific RPM band, by either inducing low-pressure pulses at the exhaust port, resulting in higher gas velocity & improved scavenging, or by inducing carefully timed high-pressure pulses at the port, resulting in a pseudo-supercharging effect & hence, higher VE.

An untuned muffler can do neither. In an untuned case, it is more beneficial to have minimum backpressure, as would result from an open header. Dar is quite correct in what he said. He is also inadvertantly in error where fortutitous circumstances conspire to cause an untuned system to accidentally result in either a low, or high-pressure pulse, with the correct timing & magnitude. The chances of that happenning with any usefull regularity are quite slim.




I get it now. I said I might be wrong about glow engines and it turns out that I am.

What you said does make sense. That being said, I have never observed this effect with the engines that I have worked on. Maybe its because of the large volumes that even untuned mufflers have on full-size two-strokes.

Is the muffler volume on glow engines restricted to provide reasonable fuel tank pressure? And folks who remove the baffle realize an immediate gain in engine performance?

(in reply to britbrat)
       Post #: 33

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 4:36:51 AM   
proptop



Posts: 4451
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: Rome, NY, USA
Status: offline
I have modified the sleeves of several engines as Asmund described...

I typically see about 4-500 r.p.m. increase with all else being the same as before the mod.

Example: O.S. .61FX was 11,100 before, and 11,500 after. 10% powermaster, APC 13X6 sport, slimline muffler and #8 plug.
(it was in a 9 lb. Corsair, hence the big prop )

_____________________________

It's bad luck to be superstitious...
Revver Bro #77

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 34

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 2:18:01 PM   
britbrat


 

Posts: 3299
Joined: 6/15/2004
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The_Pipefather

Is the muffler volume on glow engines restricted to provide reasonable fuel tank pressure? And folks who remove the baffle realize an immediate gain in engine performance?


Fuel tank pressure is not really a significant consideration, unless carb-throat sizes are excessive & the engines have poor fuel draw. There are a few examples of this situation, but not many. Muffler size is primarily restricted on model aircraft engines for weight & drag considerations, plus the sport-engine manufacturers seldom do any significant engineering on standard silencers for cost reasons. There are a couple of notable exceptions -- OS has actually spent time & money on their "box" muffler & it is the chief reason that the 46 AX engine modestly outpowers its predecessor. Another exception is GMS/Tower, who offer a resonant volume muffler on some of their engines, with good results in a particular RPM band.


In most cases there is an advantage to removing the internal baffle(s) & drilling out the outlet pipe.


< Message edited by britbrat -- 3/10/2006 2:20:33 PM >

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 35

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 6:00:41 PM   
asmund


 

Posts: 1870
Joined: 11/20/2005
From: Floroe, NORWAY
Status: offline
we typically see 300-600 rpm`s gain just by removing the baffle and drilling the outlet. this will give less pressure in the muffler and tank. Maybe that`s why I dont experience any rich midrange problems on my asp xls 52 ???as numerous other reports. I love mine so far. Hope to squeese even more power out of it due to my grinding and polishing.I will report back on this during this weekend

(in reply to britbrat)
       Post #: 36

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 6:38:18 PM   
The_Pipefather


 

Posts: 97
Joined: 11/16/2005
From: Mysore, INDIA
Status: offline
If that is the case then I bet using a stub exhaust will definitely be an improvement over both open exhaust & silencer?

That s how we tested our engines. A stub of tubing the same dia as the original header and about 6 to 8" long (on a 125cc engine) would remove the undesired reversion of exhaust gas during the upstroke (& the resultant messing up of jetting/carburetion), and also improve exhaust velocity over open condition. This was the baseline condition for checking changes in intake duration, intake length and carb dimensions.

Anyone willing to try it out?

(in reply to asmund)
       Post #: 37

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 6:54:58 PM   
Hercmate



Posts: 495
Joined: 11/12/2002
From: SwindonWiltshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Status: offline
Gentlemen, thanks for all your replies! I've been away all week on business and this is the first time since last weekend I've had to view the thread

I'm going to have a go at porting an older Leo 25 engine but I've also taken on board the other stuff about bearings, carbs, fuel and exhausts etc!

To answer a few of the posts....

Ed Cregger you mentioned that I didn't state the use for the engine - I did in post 13! They are used in r/c spad combat where the rules allow stock motors of .30 or below with NO tuned pipes because of noise. If I was a little cryptic it's because I'd like to keep it quiet that I'm going to modify my engines! This isn't because it's against the rules, it's purely because I'd like an edge in combat. I've been using an MVVS 26 with a mini pipe and it's making about 17.5 rpm on an APC 9x4, however it runs on a pipe which isn't now allowed.

Kweasel cheating is out of the question, I want to do this legitimately or not at all.

Keep the discussion coming!! I'll post back when I've done some modifications and got some results.

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 38

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/10/2006 6:55:23 PM   
britbrat


 

Posts: 3299
Joined: 6/15/2004
From: Deep River, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The_Pipefather

If that is the case then I bet using a stub exhaust will definitely be an improvement over both open exhaust & silencer?

That s how we tested our engines. A stub of tubing the same dia as the original header and about 6 to 8" long (on a 125cc engine) would remove the undesired reversion of exhaust gas during the upstroke (& the resultant messing up of jetting/carburetion), and also improve exhaust velocity over open condition. This was the baseline condition for checking changes in intake duration, intake length and carb dimensions.

Anyone willing to try it out?



You are correct -- I quite agree -- except that either an open exhaust, or a stub pipe are unacceptably loud in most jurisdictions. Hence, muffled tuned pipes, resonant mufflers & unbaffled stock mufflers.

(in reply to The_Pipefather)
       Post #: 39

RE: Increasing 2 stroke performance - how? - 3/11/2006 3:15:47 AM   
downunder



Posts: 3158