icrashbipes
Posts: 216
Joined: 7/10/2003 From: Jackson,
TN, USA Status: offline
|
Excellent points concerning immediate gratification. I was once one of those glow fliers that was fed up with all baggage that comes with that power source. A few years back, I switched to gas only and have been happy ever since. Your point about switching batteries. This was another issue that I encountered with my short run at electric flight. When you pay 169 dollars for a battery that will give you the performance you need for your installed equipment, the last thing you wanna do is buy another. So what did I do? I had to wait an hour between flights while it charged. I'll concede that smaller packs for foamies and the like are fairly inexpensive, if you fly anything over 6lbs you are going to be forking over some major bucks for 4 or more cells worth of battery. Then you also have to think about shelf life and cell balancers and burning your house down, etc. I don't care what people fly, whatever makes you happy is fine w/ me. But don't force this stuff on me in the print media. There are magazines dedicated to electric flight only, if I want to read 20 articles on electric related material I will pick up one of them. quote:
ORIGINAL: gboulton I'm in agreement for the most part. I fly a bit of all of them. Currently own a 78" gasser, 3 glow planes, and a balsa built up electric, and am building a 1/4 scale that may be glow or gas, not sure yet. As you pointed out, electrics are quiet, clean, etc etc etc. However, I absolutely must agree with you...the commonly held belief that the cost is even comparable is a downright MYTH. Sure...you CAN get an electric plane in the air for $X...but to convert a glow plane to electric will, as you discovered, cost a BUCNH more than X imo. Do I think it's a conspiracy? Eh...no more than any other industry driving the "latest technology" is. Honestly, I think their popularity really has more to do with 2 simple factors: 1) The "big guys" fly electric. Look around at the results of the various high profile competitions over the last 3-4 years. More and more often, you're seeing "big time pros" flying electric aircraft n competition. And, of course, as we saw with the explosion of biplanes, then later Extras, and more recently Yaks, EVERYBODY wants to fly what the big boys fly...so, electric it is. 2) Immediate gratification. It's the age old issue in nearly ANY activity...make it easy, simple, and fast, and you can charge more. So, take your average newbie. He sees glow and/or gas guys carting boxes and tollchests full of equipment around, starters, big field batteries, $17/gallon glow fuel, mucking about with mixing oil and gas (and remembering to stop and buy them!), etc etc etc. Then, once we get all this "garbage" out to the field, we twist needles, change plugs, fuel, defuel, argue with a poorly running engine, "waste" time breaking in new ones, and on and on. What does he do? Grab a plane, a radio, and a charger that fits in his cigarette lighter, and off he goes. Turn plane on, hit throttle, and we're off. Done flying, swap a battery, put the first one on charge, and here we go again. Quick, easy, simple. Quite honestly, I happen to like my Mini Funtana, and enjoyed my ElectroStreak for precisely this reason...they are quick, easy, and simple to get some flights in, no mucking about with any sort of hassle. Don't get me wrong...I'm not saying that it's "right" or "wrong"...merely that, imo, those are the two factors that drive the current electric popularity.
< Message edited by icrashbipes -- 4/12/2006 7:33:12 PM >
_____________________________
-RD
|