AMA E Membership(Poll added)  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       


Dave Patrick Models Extra 330L - RTF
Seller:  cdp2buck
Details:   $845.00   |  10/7/2008   |  Classified Ad
We will rotate YOUR AD in this spot if you select "Forum Featured" when placing or editing your ad!

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> AMA Discussions >> AMA E Membership(Poll added)
Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

[Poll]

AMA E Membership(Poll added)


I think that the AMA proposal is a good idea
  32% (20)
I think that this proposal is a bad idea and should not happen.
  59% (37)
I don't know what to think.
  8% (5)


Total Votes : 62


(last vote on : 4/26/2008 3:55:43 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AMA E Membership(Poll added) - 4/21/2006 10:53:56 PM   
50%plane



Posts: 3759
Joined: 3/8/2005
From: x, , USA
Status: offline
Well, Joyce Hager just emailed me. You probably got the same email, but if you didn't, here it is:


quote:

Dear AMA Member,

I am sending this E-mail to you in a request for your assistance. With recent advancements in electric R/C technologies and the advent of the very popular "Park Flyer" aircraft, the demographics of the modeling community are rapidly changing. In order to better serve our members the AMA Executive Council is considering instituting a membership program that is specifically aimed at addressing the needs of the park flyer pilots. We have defined these "park flyer modelers" as having models that weigh 2 pounds or less, do not exceed 60 mph, and do not fly higher than 200 feet.

This proposed program would have less insurance coverage, be limited to non-sanctioned events, and include a bimonthly magazine focusing on electric-powered aircraft. Additionally, we view this new membership group as establishing electric-power flying fields in urban areas and not being part of existing clubs. We have priced this program at $29.95 per year.

To better assess the views of the membership, the AMA Executive Council is seeking your input in answering the following questions:

1) Given your current involvement in the hobby, would an "electric only" program as described above better meet your needs?

2) If such an alternative membership program was offered, would you be inclined to choose this program over your existing full-service membership?

Again, I want to underscore that this is a proposed program.

Thank you for your assistance!

Joyce Hager

Acting Executive Director on behalf of the Membership Development Committee


Also the attached chart was included.


50%

Attachments
Click to see fullsize image.
Click for fullsize


< Message edited by 50%plane -- 5/4/2006 12:34:08 PM >


_____________________________

Model Airplanes don't kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.
Christopher A. Todd AMA# 637636
       Post #: 1

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/21/2006 11:29:36 PM   
Silent-AV8R



Posts: 1782
Joined: 3/16/2004
From: SOCAL, CA, USA
Status: offline
60 MPH???? My giant scale aerobatic planes usually fly near that limit, or just slightly above it. I don't know about you guys, but a 2 pound plane doing 88 feet per second is going to pack one hell of a whallop!!!

The plan sounds like a good idea, but I think they need to seriously re think the 60 mph thing.

_____________________________

Reality is Subjective. At least that's what I think.

(in reply to 50%plane)
       Post #: 2

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/21/2006 11:43:10 PM   
rcmiket


 

Posts: 1643
Joined: 12/11/2003
From: El Paso, TX, USA
Status: offline
I guess I see it as they woke up and are trying to adress this. Which is nice for a change not to mention they asked for our opion. By all means give them yours.

(in reply to Silent-AV8R)
       Post #: 3

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/21/2006 11:51:20 PM   
abel_pranger


 

Posts: 2319
Joined: 5/7/2003
From: St Augustine, FL,
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 50%plane

Well, Joyce Hager just emailed me. You probably got the same email, but if you didn't, here it is:
<snip>


I think the program is a good idea. I also think this poll of the membership is biased to shoot it down.

"1) Given your current involvement in the hobby, would an "electric only" program as described above better meet your needs?

2) If such an alternative membership program was offered, would you be inclined to choose this program over your existing full-service membership?"

This program was very clearly intended by those that proposed it to attract e-flyers that are not currently in the AMA fold. These questions are directed at current members, and the responses to the questions are clearly intended to demonstrate that some members will opt for the $29.95 membership deal and drop their current $58 membership.
I doubt that Joyce Hager is behind this email, but she has a boss and I don't doubt that you know who that is.

Abel

(in reply to 50%plane)
       Post #: 4

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:12:03 AM   
50%plane



Posts: 3759
Joined: 3/8/2005
From: x, , USA
Status: offline
This whole plan looks to me to be an orchestrated attempt to hush the constant criticisms by offering a new idea.(did anyone else read the district reports in the latest MA?) However, this idea is crap and will only result in spending more money and dividing the membership over it.


50%

_____________________________

Model Airplanes don't kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.
Christopher A. Todd AMA# 637636

(in reply to abel_pranger)
       Post #: 5

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:12:53 AM   
STLPilot


 

Posts: 9213
Joined: 3/12/2003
From: Manhattan, NY, USA
Status: offline
I'm just wondering if this will cover you to fly anywhere that is legal to fly. Meaning if I smash into a car in a mall parking lot, am I covered? Or does coverage only carry to designated flying areas. If it covers anywhere, I'll be all over that coverage.

_____________________________

Here At The Wall

(in reply to abel_pranger)
       Post #: 6

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:15:21 AM   
RCPAUL


 

Posts: 626
Joined: 12/15/2001
From: Gahanna, OH, USA
Status: offline
Gee, I wonder how the indoor rubber and HLG folks feel about this? The sure never got a break!

Paul

_____________________________

Gosh, model airplanes are not a matter of life and death --- they're more important than that!

(in reply to STLPilot)
       Post #: 7

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:25:42 AM   
abel_pranger


 

Posts: 2319
Joined: 5/7/2003
From: St Augustine, FL,
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: STLPilot

I'm just wondering if this will cover you to fly anywhere that is legal to fly. Meaning if I smash into a car in a mall parking lot, am I covered? Or does coverage only carry to designated flying areas. If it covers anywhere, I'll be all over that coverage.


If you are flying at a site where it is legal, you are covered. That's as clear as anything in AMA policy, which given the general muddiness of it does deserve some questioning. The material emailed by Ms. Hager is ambiguous on a related point - it doesn't state specifically that members under the proposed program can fly at AMA chartered club sites, but only refers to yet-to-be-established E-flying sites.

If you have a problem with people flying at other than 'designated flying areas,' be advised that half of AMA members do not belong to clubs.

Abel

(in reply to STLPilot)
       Post #: 8

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:31:27 AM   
redfox435cat



Posts: 1030
Joined: 3/7/2005
From: Lompoc , CA, USA
Status: offline
60 mph is kinda low. The speed limit makes perfect sense but Alot of park flyer do well into the 80's on up, how do they propos enforcing this? My zagi is about 1.8 lbs and does around 75. it did a hair under 70 stock

_____________________________

Heads up.

(in reply to Silent-AV8R)
       Post #: 9

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:53:34 AM   
ira d


 

Posts: 812
Joined: 5/29/2003
From: Rancho Belago, CA, USA
Status: online
I think it is a step in the right direction as far as the price and the ins coverage is
concerned but I dont like all the restrictions.

I dont feel special fields need to be created for park flyers there is no reason they
cant use existing sites also there is no fair way to enforce speed and weight
restrictions that I can see.

_____________________________

Ira d

(in reply to 50%plane)
       Post #: 10

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 12:57:36 AM   
Jim Thomerson



Posts: 2825
Joined: 10/9/2002
From: Austin, TX, USA
Status: offline
I am philosophically against the idea of tiered memberships, I hark back to the old days when we flew all kinds of airplanes, across disciplines, and I hate to see lines drawn. I am glad to see some thinking about all this, as I have the naive view that the AMA ought to the organization for all model aviation.

(in reply to redfox435cat)
       Post #: 11

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 2:21:11 AM   
704hank


 

Posts: 37
Joined: 3/9/2005
From: Huntersville, NC, USA
Status: offline
That is the way I feel. You are AMA or you are not.
Thats it cut and dry!!!!

(in reply to Jim Thomerson)
       Post #: 12

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 3:32:01 AM   
fritzthecat



Posts: 383
Joined: 1/5/2002
From: New Orleans, LA, USA
Status: offline
I don't know.....
For over 50% of the dues you get:

20% of the liability insurance.
0% of the medical
0% of the theft
Can't fly at any AMA field.
Can't enter any sanctioned contests.
Some non-existant E power fields

Doesn't look like a good bargain to me. Maybe at U$20 or even less.

Fritz

< Message edited by fritzthecat -- 4/22/2006 3:40:28 AM >


_____________________________

Fritz the Cat
Send Money, Women and Guns!

(in reply to 704hank)
       Post #: 13

RE: AMA E Membership - 4/22/2006 4:50:38 AM   
Ken Bryant



Posts: 1356
Joined: 9/30/2002
From: Surprise, AZ, USA
Status: offline