David Gladwin
Posts: 2265
Score: 100 Joined: 2/5/2002 Last Login: 11/4/2009 From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA Status: offline
|
I dont want anyone to speculate at all, but after the hassle and personal insults I received after (objectively and correctly, it was hardly rocket science) ) identifying the BobCat elevator problem and the Mig 29 hydraulic problems, amongst others I don't, at my time of life, want to be on the receiving end of that nonsense again, but wanted to know your ideas on how best to handle the situation. something I don't think can just be swept under the carpet. Heres my view: We are indeed fortunate to be able to indulge in this hobby ALMOST without any outside interence, that freedom should be treasured and guarded. We are virtually self regulating and that means we must regulate ourselves actively, and that in turn means being active in dealing with any problems we encounter and proactive in anticipating potential problems to ensure the highest degree of safety. There is nothing wimpish or sissie about that as I can assure you all after almost 40 years of operating military and civil jets, it is the way it is in aviation. I dont see model jet ops. as all that different and I have tried to bring those relevant aspects of fullsize safety culture in to model jet operations. In turn that means discussing and identifying problems and FIXING them BEFORE we have a big accident which just COULD have us all shut down, crying in our beers AFTER the event is pointless. I care greatly for this hobby and its future and I have NO interest in damaging ANY manufacturer whatever they, or you might suggest BUT we just can't pretend that all is well when we know there are problems in our midst. In safe operation of all jets structural integrity is of the essence and some, a minority, of what I have seen and heard of does not impress. The model which broke up and crashed on Saturday was a new version Eurosport and the internal wing structure was seen to be poor. (can't be denied, lots of witnesses and photos, bits of wreckage fell in the pits) The main spar was undersize and not glued to the skin at all in some places. Now we all know that hundreds of Eurosports have made thousands of safe flights without any problem. Most of also know that a number have broken up in flight, wings failing, fuselages exploding (hardly surprising if one examines the internal airflow of early Euros) I have also seen another model from this manufacturer, a Lightning lose its stab. and crash quite near me , the internal structure of the stab. was seen to be totally inadequate, botched, so clearly this not an isolated problem. My own Euro wings had some serious flaws, now fixed, and as I still own it I have more than a passing interest, so am well qualified to comment, just as I was with the BobCat problem I built and own two of them, with over 450 flights between them and not a single problem. The question now is just how many more Euros are out there with suspect internal structures, potential failures and crashes, it is impossible to examine them without destroying them so what action should, must, be taken ? Or, knowing of this potential problem do we do nothing and take a risk that we will get away with it, again ? The least C-ARF can do is to replace this model FOC , there is NO doubt its loss was caused by defective factory work, and assure us all that steps have been taken at the factory to eliminate, as far as is humanly possible, this problem in the future. So lets hear your constructive comments on how we can deal with this and similar problems; by all means disagree with me but tell my your better approach, my mind is open, but please, please leave the comments about UFOs and Uranus for another thread, its a waste of bandwith here ! Regards, David Gladwin.
Hide Signatures
|