RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> RC Jets >> RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:18:33 PM   
wojtek


 

Posts: 3017
Joined: 12/25/2001
From: old bridge, NJ, USA
Status: offline
it looked as if all of a sudden he just lost radio control ... hey you never know, it could have gone into failsafe because someone else turned a radio on on the same channel .... its possible that it could have been someone other than the pilot who was 100% responsible.. We often think of getting shot down as a risk to our planes, but often it can be a risk to human life. I have seen planes get locked out by some numb nut who turned on, and caused a plane to crash near people.. Frequency control is something we also need to pay great attention to at all times !

_____________________________

Nothing can ever be fast enough !!!

(in reply to Theyardarm)
       Post #: 51

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:32:39 PM   
SA Jet Jock


 

Posts: 108
Joined: 1/28/2002
From: Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Status: offline
We had a potentially life threatening incident at a Jet & Large Scale Fly-In recently. A 1/3 scale Wilga had just completed an aerotow when the pilot, who is very experienced and safe pilot, suddenly lost all comms with the model. The model circled under free flight for 5 minutes before descending in a lazy spiral earthwards. At one point it looked like the model would crash into the pits and we had to start getting spectators to exit the area rapidly. Scary how the non-modelling public just don't sense the danger as we modellers do. It really took some doing to get the people out of harms way. Luckily the final turn of the model took it away from the pits and it crashed on the other side of the runway.

Turns out the battery failed. New battery freshly charged overnight and suddenly nada, zip! If ever there was a case for mandatory battery back up systems in large planes this was it.

Ross

(in reply to bevar)
       Post #: 52

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:37:21 PM   
jonkoppisch



Posts: 1914
Joined: 12/17/2001
From: Wilmer, AL, USA
Status: offline
Ouch!!! Been there, done that. I've started running a second battery/switch in all of my giant scale planes.. Very inexpensive added insurance!!

_____________________________

xps and a flash = NO MORE FLASH...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2HxRNgkjpQ

(in reply to SA Jet Jock)
       Post #: 53

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:41:41 PM   
wojtek


 

Posts: 3017
Joined: 12/25/2001
From: old bridge, NJ, USA
Status: offline
its not just giant scale and jets that can be dangerous !!

http://www.gzmodel.net/oblog312/user1/kwongchina/archives/2006/2006414113426.html

here is a woman that was killed in china by what appears to be a 40 sized TRAINER ! ... anyone remember 2 - 3 years ago a guy by the name of Ron Kyle ?? he was killed by a 30 sized heli when a beginner with absolutely no idea what he was doing flew a 30 sized heli into his neck killing him ... if not taken seriously, any RC model, land air or water can be deadly !! ( as can the automobile you drive, your silverware drawer, or the chemicals under your sink .. ) no matter what we do, common sense and safety need to be on our minds at all times !


_____________________________

Nothing can ever be fast enough !!!

(in reply to jonkoppisch)
       Post #: 54

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:48:24 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bevar

Speaking of flying lawn mowers, can someone retell the story about the kid at Shea stadium getting killed by a S.O.B (Sons of Brooklyn) out of control flying lawn mower during an R/C demo years ago? I had heard the old guy flying it lost control of it and it flew into the stands killng a child, who then died from the injuries.

Every one of out toys are dangerous, be it an 80 MPH 10th scale car, Helli, nitro plane, gasser or jet. Accidents just happen, so we all have to be careful each and every time we go up.

B


Here is what I know about it, having talked firsthand to some of the people directly and indirectly involved with that incident. I don't know ALL about it, and I was not there, so don't construe all this as pure fact:

It happened in 1977 at Shea Stadium. A 60 sized plane went into the stands and killed a girl. EVERYBODY got sued, including Kraft, the radio manufacturer. Who paid? I do not know. Cases like that, it ends up being up to the insurance companies to work it out amongst themselves, often has little to do with who is actually responsible...insurers often take a pragmatic approach and just settle, each one paying part, rather than spend years in court.
Anyway...this was a paid demo. The guy who set it up got some $3000 for each demo, and they had done maybe eight demos at various stadiums. The guy had vision problems, he was losing his sight, he had limited periphial vision, and that was why he lost control of the aircraft. Another pilot refused to fly at Shea Stadium...he came walking out to do the demo with his Aeromaster under one arm and his field box under the other, stood in the middle of the field, looked around, said "this is not safe" and walked back off the field.
When you think about it, the whole situation was so dumb, so incredibly unsafe...I mean, no matter what direction you crash in, there would be people there...that the end result was inevitable. Plenty of people told the guy behind this scheme, and the other guys who flew with him, that this was a bad idea...but they were getting paid, so they did it anyway.

(in reply to bevar)
       Post #: 55

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 3:54:52 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gazzer

Hear hear David,

Right, so lets persuade RCJI, Jetpower et al to run a frequent "safety" column, analyzing risks and offering solutions. From display to average Joe Sunday flying, there will be lessons and education for us all and hopefully some of it will get embodied.

Safety is not about oodles of documentation, legislation, its about attitude, professionalism and due respect, to others and ourselves, likely it will enhance the pleasure of this hobby.

I've flown full size gliders and had some light plane exposure too, and one thing my instructor, who happened to be US Air Force fast jet said, has remained with me for may things.

"Don't go flying, go thinking about it first".

I have a one inch scar on my right forearm, half inch on my left thumb. ONe caused by a scalpel, one by a prop. Both were avoidable if I had thought about what I was doing first.

And let's face it, if you went somewhere to enjoy a hobby and you felt it was dangerous, would you get the same enjoyment?

This is a complete tragedy and information from it will be available, stuff we can all learn from.

Let's get the ideas in, the warning siren, ace idea, lets discuss safety and get the magazines to pick the mantle up and help us all.

As the BMFA say, "Safe Flying is No Accident", lets have that as the goal regardless of power source.

Gazzer


A safety column is a good idea, you should suggest it to John Wright, the new editor at RCJI, and you should start writing it. The only downside is I see people just ignoring any safety advice anyway...there are a lot of people who just don't have the right attitude, especially here in the USA...they just want to do what they want to do, and don't really care about what anybody else thinks is safe or not.

(in reply to Gazzer)
       Post #: 56

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:02:06 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wojtek

it looked as if all of a sudden he just lost radio control ... hey you never know, it could have gone into failsafe because someone else turned a radio on on the same channel .... its possible that it could have been someone other than the pilot who was 100% responsible.. We often think of getting shot down as a risk to our planes, but often it can be a risk to human life. I have seen planes get locked out by some numb nut who turned on, and caused a plane to crash near people.. Frequency control is something we also need to pay great attention to at all times !


I have been told(and this is second hand info, not to be construed as fact) that there were previous interference issues on the same channel earlier in the day. Most courts would find the pilot negligent. He knew there were potential issues. He flew anyway.
And I would have to agree with the court.
Now...it is possible this information about previous interference is not true, so take it with a grain of salt.

(in reply to wojtek)
       Post #: 57

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:06:07 PM   
wojtek


 

Posts: 3017
Joined: 12/25/2001
From: old bridge, NJ, USA
Status: offline
in the same way you could lay the blame on the radio impound, or field controller for signing out that channel ... either way, its a difficult situation, and worse of all it is difficult for the families of the dead and injured

_____________________________

Nothing can ever be fast enough !!!

(in reply to EASYTIGER)
       Post #: 58

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:18:21 PM   
ghost_rider



Posts: 4229
Joined: 12/11/2001
From: Ft Wayne, IN, USA
Status: offline
Guys

If you really want to see something very interesting, do a frame-by-frame analysis of the flight just as the loud speaker mounted on the pole comes to view with the little kid on his parent’s shoulder and pay close attention to the elevator full deflection position and also the position of the ailerons.


_____________________________

.....ghost_rider....out....
AMA 9119
“Beware of your so called friends because you know your enemies”

(in reply to wojtek)
       Post #: 59

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:23:15 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: David Gladwin

Not only does this issue NEED to be on the jet forum it should be on EVERY forum to remind everyone of the terrible consequences which can happen in our pursuit of this hobby, whatever type of power unit. Having been in top quality professional aviation all my life and deeply involved in air safety promotion for some of those years I have seen some dreadful approaches to safe operation of model aircraft by SOME operators and in some of my writing for RCJI and on RCU I have tried to highlight some of the deficiencies and bad practices in our operations and pass on some fullsize safety "culture". I have been lambasted by some, generally those who have no safety culture or "awareness", applauded by others, generally those who have some fullsize aircraft background, I even had one individual who, on RCU, suggested I took pleasure from pointing out that we have had had two fatalities in the UK, two fatalities too many. I have also seen some,/much first class operation of model jet aircraft where discipline and safety awarness is usually much better than seen in some disciplines.

It has long been my concern that sooner or later there WILL be a jet fatality, which with hindsight may well be shown to have been avoidable, if we continue as we are so lets use this dreadful accident in Hungary to take a long hard look at what we do and how we do it, NOW.

Here are some suggestions for starters in addition to the rules which already exist.

1. At all public events ALL models shall be scrutinized AND the failsafe operation DEMONSTRATED to the scruitineers.
This IS done at Classic jets in the UK, a very well run event.


2. ALL flying except for take off and landing (which can use the runway cenerline for reference.) SHALL be on the FAR side of the runway. There to be NO exceptions and that INCLUDES demo/show pilots, regardless of their origin/company/contest success. Minimum height 25 feet.
This is just a little more than the legal requirement (30metre rule) in Australia.


3. A safety "overseer" will monitor ALL flying and any pilot breaking the rules for any reason will be told to land. A second transgression puts the pilot out of the event.
This is similar to the "flying committee" system used at events like Farnborough and the RIAT.

4. All synthesised transmitters to be confirmed, by use of a monitor that they ARE radiating on the frequency selected and declared and NO frequency changeing to be done without the express approval and in the presence of the transmitter controller.

Safety issues in fullsize aviation are discussed continuously, and very aviation magazine includes a safety section , it is an attitude of mind and an integral part of aviation which needs to be greatly improved in model jet aviation, discussion on RCU can go a long way to achieving an improvement. In my view saying that this accident should not be discussed on the jet forum is symptomatic of our problem.

Many modellers would do well to follow suit and take very reasonable step to minimise the chance of an accident BEFORE it happens to the jet community. As well as the primary aim of avoiding the individual result of a trgedy it will benefit all jet modellers and those involved in the trade by ensuring that we are able to continue our operations with relative freedom from outside legislative interference.

Of course we could sit back and do nothing, content in our complacency, arguably the no1 problem in aviation safety.

Please discuss.

Regards,

David Gladwin.



"In my view saying that this accident should not be discussed on the jet forum is symptomatic of our problem. "

You said a mouthfull there.
There is no culture of safety here, it's quite the opposite.
Some of the stuff I have seen is pretty staggering over the past few years.
And the REACTION of the jet world, at least online, is pretty staggering.
NOBODY ever wants to admit fault, that a mistake might have been made...and nobody ever wants anybody to call somebody out on anything. The F-117 thread of a few weeks ago is a perfect example...someone(not me) pointed out that PERHAPS things were not handled as they should have been...the answer they got was not "maybe...let's examine this..." it was instead "DON'T STIR THE POT." "Who are YOU to question the judgement of Hot Sticks? " and then a stream of personal insults and complete denial of ANY potential misjudgement. Not to be questioned.
And nobody wants to be unpopular with the "cool crowd"....certain people seem to just do whatever they feel, and it's okay, no matter what, because nobody wants to alienate them.
It's also kind of hard to discuss new rules and procedures when there is complete disdain and non-enforcement for the ones already extant.
I agree with whoever said that a major jet accident is pretty much inevitable. My two cents is that here in the USA, it WILL take that incident to create a culture of safety, and that we are whizzing to windward trying to persuade the jet world to adopt one, at this point.
Mind you, there are PLENTY of people and events who run things in a VERY safe manner, but I'm not sure I would say it's a majority.

(in reply to David Gladwin)
       Post #: 60

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:29:12 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wojtek

in the same way you could lay the blame on the radio impound, or field controller for signing out that channel ... either way, its a difficult situation, and worse of all it is difficult for the families of the dead and injured


This is true. And most certainly, in an American court(I am only familiar with UK and US laws, and I'm not a lawyer, either...no idea of Hungarian law and attitudes) it would be litigible. If there was an impound, and the impound was aware of the interference issue, most certainly, they WOULD be liable also...
But keep in mind this is speculative...I have not heard straight from any horse's mouth that there was previous interference, it's second hand. But most certainly, if it is true, it changes everything. One would be just an accident, the other would be flying with a known problem.

(in reply to wojtek)
       Post #: 61

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:35:18 PM   
EASYTIGER


 

Posts: 7676
Joined: 12/7/2001
From: nyc, NY, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ghost_rider

Guys

If you really want to see something very interesting, do a frame-by-frame analysis of the flight just as the loud speaker mounted on the pole comes to view with the little kid on his parent’s shoulder and pay close attention to the elevator full deflection position and also the position of the ailerons.



Can you tell us what you saw, and what you concluded, rather than us having to watch the video again?

(in reply to ghost_rider)
       Post #: 62

RE: 2 death 4 wounded in model airplane crash - 5/15/2006 4:50:27 PM   
tailskid



Posts: 5464
Joined: 11/30/2001
From: Tolleson, AZ, USA
Status: offline
Safety is a serious concern to all...but when you loose control due to forces beyond your control (i.e. radio frequency interference), you are at the mercy of the situation.

_____________________________

# 93 in Club Saito

(in reply to EASYTIGER)