|
DHG -> RE: Proud Bird CG Question (10/30/2006 5:36:03 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kane The 25-33% should be measured at the MAC (mean aerodynamic chord) rather than at the root. Everyone tends to discuss the CG in terms of the distance from the leading edge at the root just outside the fuselage. Once upon a time there was an airplane designed for Pattern (aerobatics) that had a swept-forward wing. I think it was called the Perigee. About half of the folks who built the Perigee measured the CG at the root, just as they would have with a Taurus or a Kwik-Fli or an Esquire (anybody under 45 years old, never mind about those names) and they'd put it at the usual 35%. Due to the forward sweep of the wing, this actually caused the CG to end up at about 50% of M.A.C. Oh, and the wing was tapered, too. Can you say "tip stall"? So the Perigee got a reputation as a hairy, scary, unflyable beast. Not true, the reputation was undeserved. It was just a matter of careless balancing. An airplane with a swept-back wing that's mis-measured the same way will end up nose-heavy, but that isn't a disaster. It just makes the plane harder to turn tight and harder to slow down for landing. So they tend to survive long enough to get balanced correctly in the end. [8D] Duane Gall RCPRO
|
|
|
|