RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros >> Radio Manufacturer Direct Support >> Hitec/MultiPlex Radios- Ask Hitec Customer Service >> RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching
Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>  

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/17/2006 3:34:44 AM   
mglavin



Posts: 5203
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Elverta, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aramsdell

Mglavin, As I said my radio seems to fail the basic ground range test. The manual I got says 20 to 30 paces for me thats about 55 to 60 feet minmum. I'm at the lower end when jitters happen on the ground. Since I worked on the radio it has not had any kind of twitch to speak of in the air. Now after two flights near no one but myself and the ground the radio seems to be operating normally.


30 paces is recommended minimum range, that equates to 75' or better.

_____________________________

Michael Glavin
RCU Community Moderator
Hitec * Multiplex Field Representative

(in reply to aramsdell)
       Post #: 126

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/17/2006 7:55:03 PM   
Volante24


 

Posts: 31
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: Notre Dame, IN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mglavin

As I noted above I’ll take current measurements myself ASAP. What kind of equipment is your test bench comprised of or what specifically are you utilizing to compile your test data?



Thanks for clarifications, in particular regarding testing the receivers. That seemed elaborate.

It is not clear which of my measurements you referred to. When I was looking at the output signal I used an oscilloscope to observe the peak-to-peak voltage on the antenna, and the frequency counter to measure the frequency with a 1Hz accuracy (the frequency was measured both in the normal operation mode, and when I blocked the PPM signal to the oscillator and forcibly put it to ground or to "unity", to see the maximal deviation frequency). That was with Laser 4; I don't know if it qualified as a "bench" test -- I did it in the electronics lab.
When measuring the current draw with Optic, I simply connected a fully charged battery to the transmitter via the multimeter, and took the readings without the module, then with the module with the antenna fully extended.

Nick

(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 127

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/17/2006 9:12:32 PM   
Volante24


 

Posts: 31
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: Notre Dame, IN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mglavin
[
The problem with a fix is not so easy as noted in my posts previously.

Hitec has attempted to inform users, specifically in one case see this post at the top of the Hitec Factory Support Forum (this thraed)…

Dear Michael,

I am trying to be pragmatic and to soberly appreciate the situation. I
don't think anyone but you can give us a more complete picture. Some
reports here are alarming, but it is not clear how the reported
experience can be evaluated statistics-wise.

Do you have any rough idea what is the fail rate of the Spectra
modules? Is it in the ball park of 1%, 10% or 50%? Of course, you may
not have full statistics, or this information may be classified by
Hitec... I just want to appreciate what kind of chance I take if I use
Optic 6 with the Spectra.


We have two Optics, both with the Spectra. The first one has 504 on
the sticker. The second has 510. The first Optic has actually been
brought to use less than a month ago, and has been used for no more
than three hours so far, I guess; the module was put in and out maybe
a dozen times altogether.

The second Optic 6 has not been used at all (I think only was switched
on once to test a receiver for 3 minutes). The module so far has
been taken in and out five times or so.

So, can we assume that the earlier Optic with its module is as
reliable as, say Laser 4 by Hitec? My son began to use that Optic 6 it
and he does not want even to hear about getting back to Laser 4. What
can be done in practical terms to minimize the potential risk of
intermittently loosing the control?

What about the second Optic with the newer Spectra module? I would
simply put a fixed RF module if Hitec sent me the one for channel 15
we use. But this is unlikely to happen, and, for instance, Tower
Hobbies do not have channel 15 in stock (they have only a few
available channels).

Now, what can be done with the transmitter if I want to be really
responsible and do not want to take a chance? I am away now and cannot
take a closer look at this new module and how it fits. However, I
would say that a little extra clearance by itself can hardly cause
such a dramatic consequence unless this connector or the module itself
is a weak point by itself.

What is, according to your understanding, the actual cause of the
problem: the contacts at the pins, or cracks/contacts inside the module
itself between the connector and PCB, developing due to mechanical
stresses? While we can hardly do much in the former case, it is
probably possible to secure the latter part when the module is open and
the PCB exposed. I fixed a number of problems of the latter sort,
for instance, by just soldering in parallel to the PCB lines usual
flexible wires, and those were fixes forever.


Now, the idea to fix the module with the tape does not sound too
solid, and has been criticized here. If the whole problem is just to
mechanically fix the module firmly, I can do it easily on a rather
permanent basis. For instance, what can be easier than to CA to the
sides appropriately chosen thin fiberglass plates (like those used for
PCBs)? Or just the balsa strips which can be sanded to the exact
match. This way I can make the lateral clearance as little as 100,
maybe even 50 microns. Of course it will become more difficult to
replace, in particular to take out the module, but with a clever
approach this can be easily taken care of.

Alternatively, I can drill, with the module in, four small holes right
along the slot in between the module and the body, to screw in
four tiny metal screws, or even better machine screws. In this case
no any shift of the module relative to the body will ever happen,
either lateral or any other, until the screws are removed.

What can you say regarding this sort of approach, based on your
experience? Would this tight mechanical fit make Optic 6 with Spectra
as safe and reliable as we normally expect from the Hitec
transmitters?


Nick

P.S. By the way, let me note a drawback in Optic 6: The trainer system
in Lasers is smart in that if no valid signal comes to the trainer
port in the master radio, the control is returned to it weather or not
the trainer switch is activated. And this safety feature is not
implemented in Optic. It would be better to enforce it in the future
software versions.



(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 128

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/18/2006 5:56:37 AM   
mglavin



Posts: 5203
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Elverta, CA, USA
Status: offline


Nick,

quote:


I am trying to be pragmatic and to soberly appreciate the situation. I don't think anyone but you can give us a more complete picture. Some reports here are alarming, but it is not clear how the reported experience can be evaluated statistics-wise.


Herein lies our dilemma, While many reports are likely factual others are simply misguided or perhaps wishful thinking or blame IMO.

quote:

Do you have any rough idea what is the fail rate of the Spectra modules? Is it in the ball park of 1%, 10% or 50%? Of course, you may not have full statistics, or this information may be classified by Hitec... I just want to appreciate what kind of chance I take if I use Optic 6 with the Spectra.


The failure rate of the Spectra module in of itself is less than 1%. Remember the problem with intermittent RF output experienced with the Optic is not a module or TX failure. As mentioned previously its al about the mechanical interference or tolerances.

quote:

We have two Optics, both with the Spectra. The first one has 504 on the sticker. The second has 510. The first Optic has actually been brought to use less than a month ago, and has been used for no more than three hours so far, I guess; the module was put in and out maybe a dozen times altogether.

The second Optic 6 has not been used at all (I think only was switched on once to test a receiver for 3 minutes). The module so far has been taken in and out five times or so.

So, can we assume that the earlier Optic with its module is as reliable as, say Laser 4 by Hitec? My son began to use that Optic 6 it and he does not want even to hear about getting back to Laser 4. What can be done in practical terms to minimize the potential risk of intermittently loosing the control?


Again it’s not a question of the modules integrity but that of the ill fit within the TX module cavity. I’m not aware of the specific dates codes that are affected by the NEW Spectra module housing, your date codes suggest the units were manufactured April 2005 and October 2005. Please measure the outside dimensions of the cases for comparison. Due the modules move around excessively?

quote:

What about the second Optic with the newer Spectra module? I would simply put a fixed RF module if Hitec sent me the one for channel 15 we use. But this is unlikely to happen, and, for instance, Tower Hobbies do not have channel 15 in stock (they have only a few available channels).

Now, what can be done with the transmitter if I want to be really responsible and do not want to take a chance? I am away now and cannot take a closer look at this new module and how it fits. However, I would say that a little extra clearance by itself can hardly cause such a dramatic consequence unless this connector or the module itself is a weak point by itself.


Unfortunately I don’t have one of the new Spectra modules at my disposal at this time. I have two Optics and several Spectra modules but they are the earlier version from 2004.

I measured the original Spectra module cases, both are 1.475”. Optic module cavity > 1.495” Eclipse module cavity > 1.485

The modules are notably looser in the Optic compared to the Eclipse .010” makes
a difference…

quote:

What is, according to your understanding, the actual cause of the problem: the contacts at the pins, or cracks/contacts inside the module itself between the connector and PCB, developing due to mechanical stresses? While we can hardly do much in the former case, it is probably possible to secure the latter part when the module is open and the PCB exposed. I fixed a number of problems of the latter sort, for instance, by just soldering in parallel to the PCB lines usual flexible wires, and those were fixes forever.


I have been assured on numerous occasions the ONLY problem is entirely with the mechanical-physical interface of said pins/socket.

quote:

Now, the idea to fix the module with the tape does not sound too solid, and has been criticized here. If the whole problem is just to mechanically fix the module firmly, I can do it easily on a rather permanent basis. For instance, what can be easier than to CA to the
sides appropriately chosen thin fiberglass plates (like those used for PCBs)? Or just the balsa strips which can be sanded to the exact match. This way I can make the lateral clearance as little as 100, maybe even 50 microns. Of course it will become more difficult to
replace, in particular to take out the module, but with a clever approach this can be easily taken care of.

Alternatively, I can drill, with the module in, four small holes right along the slot in between the module and the body, to screw in four tiny metal screws, or even better machine screws. In this case no any shift of the module relative to the body will ever happen,
either lateral or any other, until the screws are removed.

What can you say regarding this sort of approach, based on your experience? Would this tight mechanical fit make Optic 6 with Spectra as safe and reliable as we normally expect from the Hitec transmitters?


I agree on the tape comment, but it simply works in nearly all cases I’m advised… I like the idea of the screws as the best approach, but this is inconvenient for those that enjoy the channel changing features regularly. Glued shims to the module housing makes the most sense to me and is a more pliable answer IMO. From what I can ascertain with what I have the shims need only be fitted on the sides of the module. Possibly some plastic stock available from the LHS would be the best answer, MAYBE .010” stock on each side of the module.

I am assured by Hitec Service fixing the module in place will eliminate the glitching phenomena. I have a new version smaller module on the way to me, I’ll compare it to the 1.475in\37.5mm width if the original module case.



< Message edited by mglavin -- 10/18/2006 6:09:35 AM >


_____________________________

Michael Glavin
RCU Community Moderator
Hitec * Multiplex Field Representative

(in reply to Volante24)
       Post #: 129

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/18/2006 9:11:24 PM   
Volante24


 

Posts: 31
Joined: 10/12/2006
From: Notre Dame, IN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mglavin

I’m not aware of the specific dates codes that are affected by the NEW Spectra module housing, your date codes suggest the units were manufactured April 2005 and October 2005. Please measure the outside dimensions of the cases for comparison. Due the modules move around excessively?


Dear Michael,

In the first post of this thread 6/21/2006 6:25:43 PM MikeMayberry
wrote "this problem only seems to take place with Spectra modules with
a date code of 7/05 or newer."

The transverse size of the module (the new one, 10/05) appears to be
the same 1.475" according to my wife, as you reported. I cannot check
the TX case cavity now since am away. But .01" or even 0.02" sounds
too small to me to account for the problem, I thought something a few times
larger was discussed. Maybe this module is from the "old" variety, I
simply took it from the above post that it had a chance to be
problematic. Let you check your new ones when they arrive.

quote:


I have been assured on numerous occasions the ONLY problem is entirely with the mechanical-physical interface of said pins/socket.


Let me clarify the origin once again. We accept that the problem is
the loose mechanical fit of the module in the TX module cavity. Then
what does it eventually cause -- solely the poor contact between the
pins and the socket in the connector? Was there any problem observed in
the problematic modules with the connection between the socket and the
PCB conductors?

Nick

(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 130

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/18/2006 10:33:43 PM   
Toker41


 

Posts: 309
Joined: 2/18/2006
From: Marlton, NJ, USA
Status: offline



< Message edited by Toker41 -- 10/19/2006 12:33:52 AM >


_____________________________

There are 2 kinds of planes. Those that have crashed, and those that will...

(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 131

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/19/2006 2:51:53 PM   
still4given



Posts: 463
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Victorville, CA, USA
Status: online
On both of my Optic 6 transmitters, there was only room for one piece of electrical tape. if you put two pieces, you had to force the module into the opening and it was very difficult to remove. It is really hard for me to believe that the thickness of one piece of tape should cause enough slop to cause good connectors to lose their connections. The only thing that makes sense is that inferior connectors were used in the manufacturing of these modules. These modules were supposed to be designed to be frequently removed and replaced since the frequency adjustment pots are located on the side of the module, requiring the removal of the module in order to change frequencies. Adjustable frequencies is what the Spectra Module is all about.

Clearly, the connectors used in these modules are faulty. For Hitec to not recall these and either install quality connectors or replace all of the Spectra modules with ones that have improved connectors is completely irresponsible. These planes are very dangerous when out of control, not to mention, very expensive to replace. Is it going to take a law suit before Hitec does the responsible thing? I just don't get it.

_____________________________

Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply.
Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God

(in reply to Toker41)
       Post #: 132

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/20/2006 3:35:14 AM   
aramsdell


 

Posts: 22
Joined: 9/25/2006
From: Sanford, ME, USA
Status: offline
Mglavin,

Glitches aren't just for Spectra anymore. I must offer up at least a meager appology. I have made several posts here and in my mind was 95% certain that the Optic 6 was the problem. I had some joy in that cleaning the PCB and gently twisting the pins in back of the RF module location I seemed to lose interference. The range test still was short. I have faith in Hitec though. While this discussion has been going on I decided that my next radio was going to be an Eclise 7 Spectra PCM. This afternoon the in flight glitches came back and I nearly lost the heli with camera. I'll say again no spectators just me and the ground around. Lady Luck
(UPS) arrived as I returned home. To verify that the Optic 6 wasn't the major culprit didn't take long! I say major because I can still get little chirps out of my helis with the Optic if I wiggle the RF module with my finger tips with the antenna collapsed. You have been right in suspicion of the receiver. It's an R6USL by JR in plastic heat shrink . Since I still get little glitches with the antenna down if I wiggle the module then there is still something wrong with the basic design that needs addressing. Perhaps if the channel dials were moved to be accessed out the back with a cover over them that also disabled tranmitting until it is replaced in conjunction with much tighter pins might work.

(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 133

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/20/2006 4:09:46 AM   
mglavin



Posts: 5203
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Elverta, CA, USA
Status: offline
Nick

quote:


The transverse size of the module (the new one, 10/05) appears to be the same 1.475" according to my wife, as you reported. I cannot check the TX case cavity now since am away. But .01" or even 0.02" sounds too small to me to account for the problem, I thought something a few times larger was discussed. Maybe this module is from the "old" variety, I simply took it from the above post that it had a chance to be problematic. Let you check your new ones when they arrive.


Unless your wife used a dial indicator or something similar she probably is in error. The date code thing is purported to be accurate but I don’t know for sure. If you can move the module around while seated in the cavity there is room to break the contact interference. I will advise on the new breed case size ASAP.

quote:


Let me clarify the origin once again. We accept that the problem is the loose mechanical fit of the module in the TX module cavity. Then what does it eventually cause -- solely the poor contact between the pins and the socket in the connector? Was there any problem observed in the problematic modules with the connection between the socket and the PCB conductors?


Again I have be assured the problem lies solely with the breaking contact and we can only get it to occur momentarily (according to our test equipment) it never completely goes away, simply a glitch.

_____________________________

Michael Glavin
RCU Community Moderator
Hitec * Multiplex Field Representative

(in reply to aramsdell)
       Post #: 134

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/20/2006 4:39:57 AM   
mglavin



Posts: 5203
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Elverta, CA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: still4given

On both of my Optic 6 transmitters, there was only room for one piece of electrical tape. if you put two pieces, you had to force the module into the opening and it was very difficult to remove. It is really hard for me to believe that the thickness of one piece of tape should cause enough slop to cause good connectors to lose their connections. The only thing that makes sense is that inferior connectors were used in the manufacturing of these modules. These modules were supposed to be designed to be frequently removed and replaced since the frequency adjustment pots are located on the side of the module, requiring the removal of the module in order to change frequencies. Adjustable frequencies is what the Spectra Module is all about.

Clearly, the connectors used in these modules are faulty. For Hitec to not recall these and either install quality connectors or replace all of the Spectra modules with ones that have improved connectors is completely irresponsible. These planes are very dangerous when out of control, not to mention, very expensive to replace. Is it going to take a law suit before Hitec does the responsible thing? I just don't get it.


The same out sourced commercially available straight pin and female plated headers have been used for many years with nary a problem; nothing has changed in this regard.... Yes perhaps the channel selecting switches being accessible without benefit of removing the module would be an improvement.

Clearly your assertion is in error as you are not the manufacturer of said product and are looking in from the outside with an obviously callous opinion and regard for same. Where is your R&D, manufacturing experience and your service data? Why do you insist there is more to this problem than the Hitec Engineers claim? Are you an expert, do you work with or in the electronics industry, have you ascertained without doubt your claims are viable or are they wishful thinking and or simply speculation? Can you back up your assertion with test data, credentials and experience on the bench over time?

I am not speaking directly for Hitec Corporate in this regard but believe if the problematic intermittent glitching behavior was as irresponsible, dangerous and the sky was falling because of the reported problematic glitching experienced by few in the scheme of things Hitec would recall the Optic TX's... I suggest while some really have issue; others simply point fingers and make noise.









_____________________________

Michael Glavin
RCU Community Moderator
Hitec * Multiplex Field Representative

(in reply to still4given)
       Post #: 135

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/20/2006 4:54:12 AM   
mglavin



Posts: 5203
Joined: 11/29/2001
From: Elverta, CA, USA
Status: offline
The official fix is in validated and is anticipated to be available by late November. There will be no charge for the FIX. For anyone that is interested in same, simply return your Optic and module to Hitec Service USA (for product purchased in the Americas).

As discussed the official Hitec position on the intermittent glitching experienced by modelers utilizing the Optic TX and late model Spectra synthesized TX modules is simply-solely-empathically the loose seated fit of the Spectra module specifically in the Optic TX module cavity…

The FIX:

Replacement of the rear cover of the Optic TX’s with a new fourth generation Optic rear case halve. Three tools were developed subsequent to the realization of the problematic behavior of the Optic TX and Spectra module of late until such time the injection molded end result was deemed to have the right combination of physical interference as well the module registering to the male pin header of the TX PCB.

_____________________________

Michael Glavin
RCU Community Moderator
Hitec * Multiplex Field Representative

(in reply to mglavin)
       Post #: 136

RE: Optic/Spectra Glitching - 10/20/2006 1:32:42 PM   
Toker41


 

Posts: 309
Joined: 2/18/2006
From: Marlton, NJ, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mglavin


quote:

ORIGINAL: still4given

On both of my Optic 6 transmitters, there was only room for one piece of electrical tape. if you put two pieces, you had to force the module into the opening and it was very difficult to remove. It is really hard for me to believe that the thickness of one piece of tape should cause enough slop to cause good connectors to lose their connections. The only thing that makes sense is that inferior connectors were used in the manufacturing of these modules. These modules were supposed to be designed to be frequently removed and replaced since the frequency adjustment pots are located on the side of the module, requiring the removal of the module in order to change frequencies. Adjustable frequencies is what the Spectra Module is all about.

Clearly, the connectors used in these modules are faulty. For Hitec to not recall these and either install quality connectors or replace all of the Spectra modules with ones that have improved connectors is completely irresponsible. These planes are very dangerous when out of control, not to mention, very expensive to replace. Is it going to take a law suit before Hitec does the responsible thing? I just don't get it.