SKYPILOT
Posts: 705
Joined: 12/8/2001 From: Perris,
CA, USA Status: offline
|
Hi manix, Well, from a flying standpoint, they fly VERY similar, with a slight edge going to the Neptune. It comes out lighter when done, and lighter is always better. From a construction standpoint, the Neptune gets a much bigger nod. The airframe is lighter, stronger, and stiffer, and that adds up to a higher overall quallity plane. (disclaimer) Just so the Seamaster guys don't get their feathers ruffled over my above statement, remember, this is just my opinion, based on having had and flown both. It's NOT a knock! A larger number of my flying buddies have Seamasters than Neptunes, and are VERY happy with them. But manix asked me a direct question, so i gave a direct answer. Ok, disclaimer off My latest Neptune is REALLY over the top!! I put high end JR digitals on ALL flight surfaces, a high powered OS-50 SX, on Coolpower 30% heli fuel, and it just SCREAMS It's VERY light and powerfull, and has unlimited vertical. I also set it up with a VERY aft C/G (which i deffinitely don't recommend), so it tumbles and and spins like a blur. But in low rates, it is smooth and precise like a pattern plane. MAN, i love flying that plane
_____________________________
Regards, Scott
|