DonStegall
Posts: 614
Joined: 8/8/2005 From: Monroe,
NC, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: burgster Everyone has done and is doing a great job of promoting the 424 events. I think that this where the promotion should stay and include the 428 and 422 events as well. Let's set the record straight about one thing. There are at least 11 "Official" AMA racing classes already, plus one more that will probably be added in the current vote. Giant Scale Dominator 1500 - May be provisional Biplane AT-6 Formula 1 Experimental Unlimited SWRA Gold Silver Bronze Event Specific Formulas AMA 424 AMA 428 AMA 422 Yes, the Giant Scale racers are AMA classes, like it or not. The USRA is an "Official" AMA SIG. So is the SWRA. And it's classes are governed by the AMA. The Gold breakout time is set by the AMA. The SWRA has had some problems, but it is still an "Official" AMA SIG. It has never received recognition by the AMA pylon community, but it still is an AMA SIG. RCPRO is not an AMA SIG. Probably never will be. We have no intentions of becoming an AMA SIG. We will be an organization for ALL R/C pylon racers, as our mission statement says. There are far more non-AMA Event Specific races than there are 424, 428, and 422. Some are almost as big as the NATS. Kevin Norred has been having T-34 races for years. The attendence puts many "AMA" races to shame. Does the fact that his class is not in the rulebook mean that his races are not legitimate? I don't think so. The Spirits of St Louis have had 2 articles in Model Aviation in the past couple of years. That is 2 more than the NMPRA. So which is more legitimate? Obviously the NMPRA is an AMA SIG, and is mentioned in the R/C Pylon Racing Rules. But the rules have course designations for 2 pole racing, and I know of no NMPRA races that use the 2 pole course. I am an NMPRA member, supporter, and proponent. But the NMPRA is focused on the AMA Event Specific Formulas, and that is fine. RCPRO will be an advocate for ALL pilots interested in ANY form of R/C pylon racing. Club 40 is designed to fit in with the current needs of many AMA clubs and potential pilots. I think it fits better than 424. But that is just my opinion. I was going to finish, but I have to add this. The NCPL does not use the AMA rules for their NCPL 500 racing. Why not? They apparently don't feel that the AMA classes meet their needs. Barry Leavengood runs Slow Quickie, AT-6, Air Cruiser, and Trainer racing. He uses these classes to keep people involved, and it is working in his area. We all need to stick together and get this bickering over "Official" AMA classes off the board. It does not help anyone.
< Message edited by DonStegall -- 8/6/2006 8:55:08 PM >
_____________________________
Don Stegall RCPRO - http://www.rcpro.org - http://www.rcpylon.com
|