Triton vs. SuperNova  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more >> Batteries & Chargers >> Triton vs. SuperNova
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/30/2002 8:55:30 PM   
Scott S.


 

Posts: 59
Joined: 1/7/2002
From: Fishers, IN, USA
Status: offline
Okay, here is the deal, I think I have got it down to one of these 2 chargers, but I just can't decide on which one. I have always been leary of FMA's reputation, but Great Planes is just as much of a concern. I like the fact the Triton has Lithium capabilities, but I may never use them. Heck I just got in NiMH. Other than that, they seem to be very similar, so any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!!!

_____________________________

Wanna hover...buy a damn helicopter!!!
       Post #: 1

You might consider - 12/31/2002 1:41:13 AM   
zero244


 

Posts: 176
Joined: 1/19/2002
From: Mcminnville, OR, USA
Status: offline
A SuperTurbo........I have two and they work great......very easy to program......and they have a couple of features the SuperNova is missing. The Triton seems to be getting the thumbs up....with some minor probs is Ion batteries.
The superturbo has been field tested for a while........while the Triton is Brand New........you might want to wait 6 months to see if the Triton stacks up ok.


_____________________________

Happy Thermaling !!!

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 2

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 3:20:57 AM   
Red Scholefield



Posts: 5106
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Newberry, FL, USA
Status: offline
For what its worth, my sources say the SuperTurbo and Triton were designed by the same individual in Korea.

_____________________________

Red S.
AMA 951 Leader Member
Disclaimer: What I have written here are my thoughts and in no manner shape or form reflect the views of RCU

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 3

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 6:33:52 AM   
lennyk


 

Posts: 571
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Port of Spain, FL, USA
Status: offline
Tell the guy to start his own operation from home and program his microprocessors to target a well known 4 port charger
and start taking orders Feb 6th 9am est

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 4

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 6:53:20 AM   
Red Scholefield



Posts: 5106
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Newberry, FL, USA
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by lennyk
Tell the guy to start his own operation from home and program his microprocessors to target a well known 4 port charger
and start taking orders Feb 6th 9am est
[/QUOTE]

Apparently there is no market for them. :-)

My third one is scheduled for March shipment . . . but it is promised to a poor unfortunate chargerless individual - at cost.

_____________________________

Red S.
AMA 951 Leader Member
Disclaimer: What I have written here are my thoughts and in no manner shape or form reflect the views of RCU

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 5

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 7:08:31 AM   
ml3456-RCU


 

Posts: 558
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: Darien, IL, USA
Status: offline
Will the Alpha charge multiple Nimh packs. of 4.8 and 6 volt, or just 2? There web site leaves a little to be desired, but there reputation is very good.

ML

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 6

Zero244 - 12/31/2002 7:51:22 AM   
satnaam


 

Posts: 31
Joined: 8/22/2002
From: Mississauga, ON, CANADA
Status: offline
Who make's the super turbo chargerand what price range and can you list some feature's

satnaam

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 7

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 9:06:13 AM   
EdMan-RCU


 

Posts: 249
Joined: 3/5/2002
From: tallahassee, FL, USA
Status: offline
Dymond Super Turbo $109.00, http://www.rc-dymond.com/
Great charger/cycler.
-Charge/discharge 1-26 cell ni-cad & ni-mh.
-Charge up to 5amps
-DC (12volt input)
-charge/discharge or discharge/charge cycles
-adjustable trickle and delta peak sensitivity
-ect......

I have had this charger for just less than a year now with nothing but good things to say about it! However the new Triton looks to be pretty good. Hope this helps,

EdMan

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 8

Triton Vs. Dymond - 12/31/2002 11:09:23 AM   
wuudogg



Posts: 166
Joined: 9/5/2002
From: Ashburn, VA, USA
Status: offline
I have owned the Dymond Super Turbo for about 6 months. It's a great charger. Easy to use. Programmable memory.

Dad got the Triton for XMAS.... so of course I got to mess around with it. Also easy to use. Programmable memory. Triton will charge your Lead Acid and Lion batteries too (Dymond Super Won't). I like the controls on the Triton.

I don't plan to turn in my Dymond Super Turbo anytime soon for an upgrade though.

... if it ain't broke (blah blah blah)

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 9

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 4:28:15 PM   
Red Scholefield



Posts: 5106
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Newberry, FL, USA
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ml3456
Will the Alpha charge multiple Nimh packs. of 4.8 and 6 volt, or just 2? There web site leaves a little to be desired, but there reputation is very good.

ML
[/QUOTE]

It will charge 4 packs at once - independently.

_____________________________

Red S.
AMA 951 Leader Member
Disclaimer: What I have written here are my thoughts and in no manner shape or form reflect the views of RCU

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 10

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 7:10:42 PM   
gwright


 

Posts: 388
Joined: 1/11/2002
From: Melbourne, FL, USA
Status: offline
But the alpha (I have one) will only do 1 amp,.. and that's divided by the number of ports you have active,.. so 1 amp rate for one pack, 250mah ea if charging 4 at one, 1/2 amp if charging 2 packs at one,..etc.
. Pretty much useless unless you're just doing reciever packs. I've got a couple supernova's (work great, both over a year and a half old), and a schulze 636. Supernova's will do up to 25 cells and 5 amps, the schulze ,..36 cells and 8 amps. The automatic mode on the schulze is far better than the supernova's,.. even going to 8 amps, packs are cooler coming off the charger than from the supernova at 5 amps. 30-cell 2600mah hydride packs range from 24 minutes to 30 minutes to peak on the schulze, and come off cooler than breaking them up into multiple packs and charging on the supernova at 5 amps, which takes much longer to peak. The schulze and orbit products are really the "cream of the crop". If all you need to charge are little 4-cell and 5-cell reciever packs,..anything will do the job OK,.. no need to over-analyze the situation.

_____________________________

Gary Wright
www.gwmp.net

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 11

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 7:44:17 PM   
Red Scholefield



Posts: 5106
Joined: 12/8/2001
From: Newberry, FL, USA
Status: offline
I don't think it was ever the intent of Litco for the Alpha 4 to focus on the electric flight market but rather offer a very good system for maintaining control system packs with occasional field charge in a pinch. As it turns out it seems to fit the bill quite nicely for some of the park flyer packs and even up to speed 400 packs where you want to have four packs charged before going to the field. I think we will all agree that there is no system that does it all for everybody . . . and probably few could afford it if one were to be offered.

_____________________________

Red S.
AMA 951 Leader Member
Disclaimer: What I have written here are my thoughts and in no manner shape or form reflect the views of RCU

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 12

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 9:06:48 PM   
gwright


 

Posts: 388
Joined: 1/11/2002
From: Melbourne, FL, USA
Status: offline
Yes Red I realize that, but mucho talk about this charger versus that charger,.. yada yada,.. and if all you need is something to charge and/or discharge a little reciever pack, it really doesn't matter, the cheapest of the available chargers will do it just as well. I think it's sort of strange that someone would think about a 250 dollar charger just to charge reciever packs . Sort of like researching for a month to find the best 12 guage shotgun because you have flies in your house,.. you just need to buy a flyswatter for that for the price of the alpha 4 you can have the low-end schulze 330, and have $80 left over, plus have a lot more capabilities. The alpha 4 was great for what was intended, and when it was designed, but it's out of date and overpriced considering other things that are available now. About the only "advantage" it would have is the 4 ports, but,.. using those all at once limits you to a 250mah rate per port, so you could just spend $40 on wall warts and do the same job.

_____________________________

Gary Wright
www.gwmp.net

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 13

Triton vs. SuperNova - 12/31/2002 10:53:19 PM   
IronZ



Posts: 219
Joined: 12/27/2001
From: Tipp City, OH, USA
Status: offline
Seems no one is chiming in about the Super Nova. I LOVE mine!! My only complaint is that it won't discharge at a rate lower than 500ma. Other than that it ROCKS!!!

IronZ

_____________________________

[color=red]IronZ
[/color]

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 14

Triton vs. SuperNova - 1/1/2003 3:20:32 AM   
Jazzy



Posts: 1106
Joined: 1/8/2002
From: Erie, PA, USA
Status: offline
Ditto IronZ, ditto.

_____________________________

Aww $#!^.... I left the )@#& transmitter at home!

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 15

Even I am considering that Triton charger... - 1/1/2003 8:05:33 AM   
The PIPE



Posts: 703
Joined: 10/5/2002
From: Weymouth, MA, USA
Status: offline
Dear Fellow RCU'ers:

The PIPE Here, yet again-and even though I DO have two VERY nice SuperNova chargers, there MIGHT be just enough financial room in my budget in the New Year-the CENTENNIAL OF BIPLANE FLIGHT New Year -to pick up a Triton charger around the beginning of summer.

I've downloaded the Adobe Acrobat file of the Triton charger's manual, and though I haven't had any time to check it out closely yet, some of the nice features-like the "jog dial" to set your parameters, a discharge current that can run as low as 100 mA, and even some NICE NiMH-specific features that seem to leave the SuperNova just a bit "wanting" in that particular department.

However, as I use a 2 volt lead acid battery, running through a germanium power transistor P-N junction (in that homebuilt glow igntion boxed rig of mine that I call the "The German-ium Secret Glowplug Weapon" to reduce the voltage down to "just the right voltage" for great starts on all my four strokes, my two SuperNovas still have an important place in my support gear collection (The Triton can't handle a 2 volt lead acid battery-only 6, 12 and 24 volt setups!)

Perhaps, by the time the 2004 WRAMS Show rolls around, I'll have TWO Triton chargers as well..providing I'm not trying to charge four electroflight batteries at once, the 23 amp output 12 volt Radio Shack-sourced power supply I have for powering my SuperNovas will ALSO be running my Triton(s) for radio battery charging and maintenance without breaking a sweat!

It sure DOES look like a good, and VERY versatile, charger-and I'll TRY to see if I can get it from my LHS by May or June, as he's a Great Planes distributor!

But with ALL the nice chargers out there, it's VERY hard to understand WHY someone would want to waste their time in the "Al-phuh-Fore" allocation game-most fliers just don't have to charge FOUR batteries at once for just ONE plane's airborne radio power needs, like these guys running "upwards of quadcycle-engine sized" one third, 40% and even ONE HALF SCALE monster aerobatic models with upwards of four battery packs in them! THOSE things SCARE me... ...I'll just stick to my four stroke models, thank you-and use my SuperNovas, and perhaps a Triton or two in the near future, for my charging needs!

Yours Sincerely,

The PIPE!

(in reply to Scott S.)
       Post #: 16