wing angle  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Aerodynamics >> wing angle
Page: [1]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
wing angle - 7/11/2006 9:31:47 PM   
zflarez


 

Posts: 61
Joined: 11/30/2005
From: Menifee, CA, USA
Status: offline
Are there any arf or kits that have a true forward swept wing such as an x-29 or is the lack of stability stability to much of a problem without an onboard computer. My understanding is that the advantage to a forward swept aircraft is more manuverable because the vortex from the wings doesn't leave the wings tips but travels down the fusalage to the tail to create better control response.
       Post #: 1

RE: wing angle - 7/11/2006 10:23:49 PM   
LouW



Posts: 804
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Moreland, GA, USA
Status: offline
The forward swept wing is less stable laterally than a straight or rearward swept wing but if the sweep is moderate it can certainly be flown without a computer. However, there is no particular advantage to forward sweep. It is not more efficient, and the vortices are still shed at the tips. It looks different and that is an advantage to some, but don’t expect any significant performance gain.

(in reply to zflarez)
       Post #: 2

RE: wing angle - 7/12/2006 12:51:31 AM   
da Rock



Posts: 6704
Joined: 10/11/2005
From: western, NC, USA
Status: offline
I believe that the very few full size aircraft with forward swept wings were done for the same reason. The designers couldn't figure a way to run the wing's mainspar through the fuselage farther forward, but needed the wing's center of lift farther forward.

(in reply to LouW)
       Post #: 3

RE: wing angle - 7/12/2006 6:47:28 AM   
Globemaster3c17



Posts: 38
Joined: 11/10/2004
From: Granite, OK, USA
Status: offline
Yup, I think there's a balsa model called a Drastic, not sure that's the correct name though. I've seen a few guys build a SPAD version called a spadrastic, search for it on spadworld.net

_____________________________

CAVU Skies! Private 4-10-02, Commercial 8-16-03, Instrument 5-9-04, CFI 4-8-05, CFII 7-21-05, Multi 11-5-05

(in reply to da Rock)
       Post #: 4

RE: wing angle - 7/12/2006 2:23:54 PM   
dick Hanson



Posts: 10069
Joined: 12/12/2001
From: slc, UT, USA
Status: offline
couldn't be any worse than some of the canards I have seen by modelers -
or for that matter -by full scale designers . apparantly few of them have ever thoroughly analyzed an arrow.

_____________________________

I am watching you
Libby

(in reply to Globemaster3c17)
       Post #: 5

RE: wing angle - 7/12/2006 8:54:56 PM   
dolanosa



Posts: 227
Joined: 10/4/2005
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Status: offline
Why not make the SPADrastic? It's very ease and very cheap top build. You can then test out several wing sweep angles to find out which will be best for your taste. I've built several and they fly just like any other plane. Even made one with canards and is very short coupled. That flew well too. Just make sure that the wingtips don't start turning up, giving you wash-in. That will tip stall your plane in a hurry. Other than that, there's really nothing to it but to try. Go for it! You'll like the results better than you think.

B


_____________________________

Regards,

(in reply to dick Hanson)
       Post #: 6

Page:   [1]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Aerodynamics >> wing angle
Page: [1]





Jump to:


Google 



Search | Marketplace | Event Calendar | Local Clubs | Magazine | Product Ratings | New Products | Discussion Forums

Photo Gallery | Member Video Posts | RCU Video Gallery | Instructor Search | Field|Track|Marina Search

Advertisers | Hobby Vendor Resources | Rate Manufacturers | Sign In/Sign Up

SITE MAP!   : :   FORUM RULES

© 2001 - 2007 24-7 RC, LLC, all rights reserved.

Charities we support that also need your help
Yorkie Rescue | Humane Society | ASPCA | Crohn's-Colitis America

Kaango.com Classifieds


0.594RCU1