squidster
Posts: 60
Joined: 12/19/2007 From: oviedo,
FL, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: opjose quote:
ORIGINAL: squidster The AOA is correct. Why would you want to argue with what you don't have knowledge of? Don't speak about what you know not. You obviously missed that I have now five of these planes so I can speak from SOME experience. Downthrust is - NOT - needed with glow ( and electric ) engines using the standard mounting scheme. The turbine coversion does require some downthrust. The plane does NOT pitch up if the glow/electric ngine is mounted on the centerline. If the plane requires an overly long run for takeoff, the AOA is - WRONG - period. You might ought to consider your own comments sir. Have you seen our set up to make the determination that you speak so pompously about? I don't think so. I'm glad what you have works for you. What we have works for us. Oh BTW, we have 5 of these also. So I believe I am also speaking from a position of experience.... Experience with OUR planes, not your s or anyone else's. Further, I made no comment about the plane pitching up as you suggest. I made the statement and observation from EXPERIENCE that downthrust would dramatically recduce the takeoff roll length. Please stop by sometime if you are in Florida, you can have a look for yourself. Heck I might even let you fly one of 'em.
|