New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly

New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as Guest

Users viewing this topic: mbinkley

Printable Version

All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> WildHare R/C Support >> New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/12/2006 5:10:25 PM

rctom

Posts: 5281
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline

Hello all:

Followers of this forum know that we have been working hard on a new 100cc Sukhoi.

Here it is ready for its maiden flight.

I've included a few photos of the canister installation, it's very clean and easy to do, the plane is designed with integrated tunnel and room for either two medium cans (100cc twin) or one big one (75-90cc single). This isntallation is with a DA-100.

The plane weighs 26 lb. 14 oz. ready to fly as shown. I plan to make some changes to the wings to take off maybe 4 ounces on each side, removing another half pound.

As you may be able to see, we are using the same pocket hinging on all surfaces that we did on the 41% Extra 300. No hinging required, and it flies so much better this way.

If flight testing goes smoothly we should have them available before the Xmas holidays.

Tom Fawcett

Attachments

Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize
Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize
Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize	Click for fullsize

Post #: 1

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/12/2006 10:13:14 PM

crhammond

Posts: 392
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: EdmontonAB, CANADA
Status: offline

SOLD - where do I send the cheque!!! Seriously Tom - you should take deposits, it looks FANTASTIC. I want one!!!

Chris.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rctom

Hello all:

Followers of this forum know that we have been working hard on a new 100cc Sukhoi.

Here it is ready for its maiden flight.

I've included a few photos of the canister installation, it's very clean and easy to do, the plane is designed with integrated tunnel and room for either two medium cans (100cc twin) or one big one (75-90cc single). This isntallation is with a DA-100.

The plane weighs 26 lb. 14 oz. ready to fly as shown. I plan to make some changes to the wings to take off maybe 4 ounces on each side, removing another half pound.

As you may be able to see, we are using the same pocket hinging on all surfaces that we did on the 41% Extra 300. No hinging required, and it flies so much better this way.

If flight testing goes smoothly we should have them available before the Xmas holidays.

Tom Fawcett

_____________________________

Wings Level.

(in reply to rctom)

Post #: 2

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/12/2006 10:15:19 PM

rctom

Posts: 5281
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline

Gotta see if it flies, first. BUt thanks for the encouragement.

TF

(in reply to crhammond)

Post #: 3

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/12/2006 10:32:51 PM

Tired Old Man

Posts: 12012
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline

If anyone sees one of these floating around for sale anywhere, it's a stolen plane. Let Tom, Greyhound, or myself know where you saw it.

Tom,

If it had made the trip I would have beat you into the air, you turkey. Let me know how she works if you would.

Cannisters??? Don't need no heavy, hot cannisters. I'll beat you on the weight by a pound easy

_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to rctom)

Post #: 4

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/13/2006 3:10:36 AM

gixxer01

Posts: 166
Joined: 4/5/2005
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Status: offline

...DROOL... pleaseflygreatpleaseflygreat...

Oh Tom?? One small thing. Could you show a pic of the rear exit canisters coming out of the fuse? Is it one big hole for ventilation, or 2 small ones for the discreet look?

(in reply to Tired Old Man)

Post #: 5

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/13/2006 3:23:37 AM

why_fly_high

Posts: 209
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Guthrie, OK, USA
Status: offline

The plane and scheme look great!

Dan

_____________________________

What size tank do you have in that thing?

(in reply to gixxer01)

Post #: 6

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/13/2006 10:19:39 AM

rctom

Posts: 5281
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: gixxer01

...DROOL... pleaseflygreatpleaseflygreat...

Oh Tom?? One small thing. Could you show a pic of the rear exit canisters coming out of the fuse? Is it one big hole for ventilation, or 2 small ones for the discreet look?

Two holes for the discreet look. The can setup just came out so nice, ran the engine today and it's just a whisper.

I have a MSC 26-10 prop that I have never used because it's so big at the hub no spinner I have will fit it. Since the real Sukhoi does not use a spinner maybe this is a good chance to reduce sound even more.

TF

Attachments

Click to see fullsize image.

Click for fullsize

(in reply to gixxer01)

Post #: 7

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/13/2006 4:50:04 PM

Tired Old Man

Posts: 12012
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline

Tom,

I didn't much care for the performance of the 26-10 on my 6.4. It tended to hold down the rpm too much without a gain in thrust to offset.. I ended up doing some expensive experimenting going up the size ladder with Menz and Biela props. I have a hunch you'll end up with a 27 or 28" prop when you get to the sweet spot.

_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to rctom)

Post #: 8

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/13/2006 10:11:19 PM

Jecarte

Posts: 302
Joined: 5/25/2004
From: Jacksonville, FL, USA
Status: offline

That is sweet!!

(in reply to Tired Old Man)

Post #: 9

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/14/2006 12:53:15 AM

Ken Bryant

Posts: 1356
Joined: 9/30/2002
From: Surprise, AZ, USA
Status: offline

I love the looks of that plane in the Redbull scheme. But I do have to ask a dumb question. Is that cowl just a bit on the big size?

_____________________________

Ken

(in reply to Jecarte)

Post #: 10

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/14/2006 1:01:29 AM

rctom

Posts: 5281
Joined: 5/8/2002
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX, USA
Status: offline

It may seem large, but it is quite to scale. The full scale Sukhois use the Vedeneyev radial engine and have a huge cowl.

This makes for a nice model because there's lots of room for whatever engine you might want and it has excellent downline braking, almost like flying a biplane.

TF

(in reply to Ken Bryant)

Post #: 11

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/14/2006 1:20:00 AM

Tired Old Man

Posts: 12012
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline

If I may, what were the distances from the servo arm clevis/ball link attachment to the attachment hole of the aileron horns? The same question again for the elevators if you don't object.

_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to rctom)

Post #: 12

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/14/2006 1:30:55 AM

charrua

Posts: 1047
Joined: 8/27/2002
From: Suwanee, GA, USA
Status: offline

Tom Fawcett

quote:

As you may be able to see, we are using the same pocket hinging on all surfaces that we did on the 41% Extra 300. No hinging required, and it flies so much better this way.

sorry for asking but what's the pocket huinging??? is it kind of like the composites planes???? what's the wingspan???? is it a 35%????

By the way it looks pretty cool

(in reply to rctom)

Post #: 13

RE: New Wild Hare Sukhoi ready to fly - 8/14/2006 1:38:21 AM

Tired Old Man

Posts: 12012
Joined: 2/25/2002
From: Central, CA, USA
Status: offline

35%. About 102". A lot like the Comp Arf hinging.

_____________________________

If you can''t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem.

(in reply to charrua)