Reiko
Posts: 3095
Joined: 4/15/2005 From: Liverwurst,
CA, USA Status: offline
|
Wow, this thread really took off after I left town quote:
ORIGINAL: gravelhack check this out you nitro crawler guys.......a bit too big but food for thought. Its a liquimatic go-ped torque converter. I never knew the go-ped had anything other than a centrifugal clutch... that's interesting, and could prove promising for some of the larger projects here. I think Dez has a good point about the CG, and it's true there will be marginally more weight supporting the nitro system. As a competition operator, his opinion is educated, and one I value. No idea comes to fruition without it's share of challenges. I can only offer my solution to these issues, and I believe this will be different for each member's project. I have considered the high CG problem, and if the top grows too heavy, I'll widen the track as necessary. As far as gearing, the little tranny from a TMaxx coupled with the 3.11:1 Ofna gears and mated to a 6.25" tire will yield a calculated 5.9mph top speed at 32000rpm on the electric motor. For a nitro motor, the top end will be somewhat lower. This, to me, would seem to result in a decent speed/rpm relationship for low velocity cruising. As a crawler, I have no idea of the performance because of the fact that the torque required to overcome obstacles is an unknown. This is only an example. It would seem that with proper gearing, the nitro engine can achieve low-speed maneuvering. I think a 4-stroke might be a good option for this, as it is, by design, intended to operate at a lower rpm at the outset. I searched for a liquid-cooled 4-stroke for some time, and received a fair amount of feedback on that type of system. I am moving ahead with it.
_____________________________
~Reiko~ RCU Car Forums Moderator http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_377662/tm.htm
|