RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
       



All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> Quique's Aircraft Support >> RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 9/13/2006 9:07:16 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1808
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		Marc,

RPM difference is not as much. Maybe 50 more on can. Plane in picture weighs 16 1/4 lbs if you decide to use Pitts muffler you will be in 15 lb range. Please don't hesitate to ask any questions you may have.

Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to marc 540)
       Post #: 26

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 9/13/2006 11:18:31 PM   
RCFREAK


 

Posts: 228
Joined: 9/28/2003
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline 		Trust me Marc, canister is worth the extra weight.
If you want to fly 3d the canister will improve the throttle responce, and it suits 3d flying.
A tuned pipe will not suit as its a bit to peaky and hard to tune, all the power is developed high up in the power band, you do not want this for 3d flying.

If the plane has a canister tunel built in go for it. I know im going to get a canister for mine. You get improved motor responce, nice and quiet operation, and if you get the BMB canisters the motor will run conciderably cooler than if it were on pitts mufflers (is this the same for all other canisters?), and if you can milk a couple more RPM with can's i say im all for it

Plus canisters just look nice and neat, no need to hack that beautiful cowl up to accomodate those ugly, noisy pitts mufflers .

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 27

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 9/29/2006 7:23:14 PM   
zope_pope



Posts: 1043
Joined: 1/19/2003
From: Aurora, CO, USA
Status: offline 		Any updates to report?

_____________________________

If you choose not to make a decision, you have still made a decision.

(in reply to marc 540)
       Post #: 28

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 9/30/2006 12:40:28 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1808
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		Not really

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to zope_pope)
       Post #: 29

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 9/30/2006 12:55:06 AM   
zope_pope



Posts: 1043
Joined: 1/19/2003
From: Aurora, CO, USA
Status: offline 		Bummer. This thread is such a tease.

Do you know the length of the airplane with a spinner on? Trying to measure my transport vehicle to make sure she'll fit.

_____________________________

If you choose not to make a decision, you have still made a decision.

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 30

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/8/2006 9:40:21 AM   
sonicboom


 

Posts: 154
Joined: 6/14/2003
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline 		I'd certainly be interested in the new 86" ASAP.. Im In Vic as well. If anyone gets them shipped irect can you let me know..

Cheers!

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 31

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/9/2006 3:08:54 AM   
buildflycrash



Posts: 706
Joined: 9/15/2003
From: Gulf Breeze , FL, USA
Status: offline 		Crashed my 85" Yak today. Not totaled but bad enough to get me back here.

_____________________________

Ask me about
Pensacola FL - Pro Bro & Gaint Scale 3D, June 14 & 15 2008

(in reply to sonicboom)
       Post #: 32

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/9/2006 5:24:27 AM   
sonicboom


 

Posts: 154
Joined: 6/14/2003
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline 		I know this may sound a bit crazy but I have access to a 3w 75. Would it work with an 85" QQ or would it be too heavy and difficult to balance. It is about 1000 grms heavier than a DA50. What are your thoughts? Models for the 75 size motor in very limited in Australia.

Cheers

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 33

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/9/2006 1:08:29 PM   
RCFREAK


 

Posts: 228
Joined: 9/28/2003
From: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline 		Nah Mate the 75 would be to big, DA-50 or 3W 50 would be your best bet, Im sticking with my DA-50
Any info on the new QQ Yaks 86". Where are they at now? are they shipping to america yet?

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 34

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/9/2006 2:59:53 PM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1808
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		Hi There,

It's a little too much of an engine for that plane.

Thank you,
Reza

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to sonicboom)
       Post #: 35

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/10/2006 7:45:55 PM   
plasticman


 

Posts: 304
Joined: 6/8/2005
From: Xenia, OH, USA
Status: offline 		Reza,

Do you know if this plane will be offered, as before, in the all-white scheme? If so, will Kirby's decal packages from the 85" still work?

Thanks.

P-man.


_____________________________

Plasticman

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 36

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/11/2006 4:19:56 AM   
Rezagh


 

Posts: 1808
Joined: 6/10/2004
From: Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Status: offline 		P-man,


I think first shipment will be only colored scheme. Hopefully second shipment will have some all white version. BTW, plane won't make it by December, most likely Jan, Feb.

Thank you,
Reza

< Message edited by Rezagh -- 10/11/2006 4:26:10 AM >

_____________________________

Quique's Aircraft Company

(in reply to plasticman)
       Post #: 37

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 10/16/2006 12:56:16 PM   
propstryker


 

Posts: 21
Joined: 7/25/2004
From: Asheville, NC, USA
Status: offline 		What is the wing area and length?

(in reply to Rezagh)
       Post #: 38

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 11/13/2006 9:52:31 PM   
Dav0012


 

Posts: 240
Joined: 11/21/2005
From: ...Victoria, AUSTRALIA
Status: offline 		Hi, just wondering, would a dzy twin 48cc fit in the cowl of the yak, im not sure of the dimensions of the motor nor the cowl, because i am thinking of buying one for my great planes christen eagle, due to it being able to fit in the cowl, then put it on the QQ yak when i get one..... once i save up in the good old bank account ??

(in reply to propstryker)
       Post #: 39

RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report - 11/16/2006 1:51:29 AM   
octanehuffer



Posts: 693
Joined: 7/15/2006
From: Lakeland, MN, USA
Status: offline 		I am debating on the EVO 58 and DA 50. The vids I see from QQ (50cc size) never show full throttle from hover. I try to judge the amount of engine needed by the thrust of vertical. The 50cc DA looks like it may hover at 1/2 throttle but, wont have the proper punch . Is it going to be worth the extra weight from the EVO 58 to get the "punch" I desire? Cant wait for FEB!!!

_____________________________

QQ 120" Yak, QQ 86" Evolution, QQ 69" Saito 1.25, QQ 49" 32SX, QQ E-Yak, H9 T-Craft G-26, etc

(in reply to Dav0012)
       Post #: 40

Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> Giant Scale Aircraft - 3D & Aerobatic >> Quique's Aircraft Support >> RE: New QQ-Yak 86" Pictures and Flight Report
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]





Jump to: