hilgert
Posts: 47
Joined: 1/1/2005 From: Flower Mound,
TX, USA Status: offline
|
Let me clarify my stance on this (based on some PM's, emails and posts). I SUPPORT the effort that Jim is making 100%. I myself have Spektrumized a couple of TX's to get better functionality than is in the stock DX6. I would like nothing more than to have a plug-in do-it-all module, and the price (to me) is not a problem (I'll pay for performance). What I AM questioning is some of the statements, and especially the physics and testing. I don't like to see claims made without testing from a manufacturer (and I means LOTS of testing, not a few dozen tests here and there). I can accept it from end-users, since they do not have the means for the most part to do thorough testing, so their test "results" are really "experiences". I think for this to be a viable system that we can have some faith in, it will need 100's and 100's of hours of flight testing. That's not too much to ask, and fairly easy to do with a few dozen systems given to some experienced RCers and DIY-type testers that do *not* have any financial ties to Jim or his company. So, I want it to succeed, but I think the claims and hype are being made *way* too early, and that is my concern. Just needs more cooking time, perhaps 3-6 months, with lots of testing. At that point, if successful, many of us (including myself) would endorse this system. -Hilgert
< Message edited by hilgert -- 9/10/2006 3:17:34 AM >
|