CanCanCase
Posts: 78
Score: 100 Joined: 12/4/2006 Last Login: 3/11/2007 From: Juneau, AK, USA Status: offline
|
Okay, here's the deal for anyone searching for this stuff: Parallels Desktop won't handle the DirectX graphics, and it's EMULATION anyway, so the processor is loaded up from the get-go just pushing the client OS, let alone a sim that taxes resources heavily itself. This is not an option. BootCamp, however, is simply a set of drivers for Intel Based Mac hardware to run Windows natively. Besides a set of Apple assisted drivers, all Boot Camp is is a "boot loader"... it lets you choose which of 2 bootable sections of your hard disc to work from: One may have Windows installed, and one may have Mac OS installed. Once you've booted into windows on an Intel Mac, I don't care if you call it a Mac, a "Windows Box", a PC, or a 'puter...it's all the same. Mac is a brand name, just like Dell, IBM, WinBook, AlienWare or eMachines (to name a few.) BootCamp Macintosh computers running Windows XP or Vista are running all commercial R/C flight sims very well. (This has been thoroughly discussed in the G3.x forums, and alluded to in the Apple forums as well.) I've got a 20" iMac right here in front of me (no need to go to an Apple Store!) At the moment, I'm typing this in Internet Explorer 7 running on WinXP Pro, and G3.5 is minimized (so I don't crash while I type this!) It runs great! With a stock install of Windows, I dropped my AV/Firewall software on the machine, let everything (Windows and Norton) do their updating, then on goes G3.x from the factory discs. You will need to put the machine online to update/upgrade Windows, Antivirus/Firewall, and the Flight Sim... (1 existing virus/trojan for Mac, 80,000 per day for Windows... do YOU want to run without protection?) The MacBook Pro is reported to run G3.x very well. I have first hand experience with this 20" iMac and a dual-Xeon 3Ghz Mac Pro. Both run G3 very well... even on a bad day, my frame rates rarely drop below 85... most times I stay in the 200-250 range, and I fly lots of the fast, snappy 3D stuff that taxes these systems at 1680x1050 resolution. Helis do just as well. My Mac Pro is also connected to my 65" TV via DVI/HDMI, and pushes that external video just fine.... although my wife almost killed me when I told her I wasn't limited to good weather days to fly anymore! ;-) I've installed G3.5 and FS One on a Mac Pro at an Apple Store, and both looked amazing on quad 30" cinema displays... (yes, that's 4 monitors arranged and shoved close together.) The only problem we had with that rig was that the Interlink for G3 doesn't like to have a USB extension cable added to the cord, and with the 6' cord, we couldn't get far enough away from that giant display to keep our eyes from hurting and our heads from nearly exploding. Frame rates were consistently above 300 with all details and textures maxed and full anti-aliasing in effect on the video hardware. I've heard some concern about the basic Mac Books and the Mac Minis since they use lower-end video and don't quite have the processing horsepower as the rest of the lineup. I've not personally tested anything, but I've heard that FS One runs okay on a maxed out Mini. Now for the folks who feel they "need to have a Windows PC in the house just to fly the sim".... No you don't! When I first bought G3, I had a dual P4 Dell Dimension system built to run it (and a bit of Photoshop work for my job). It ran okay... never got anything maxed out on the settings though. 2 years ago, that machine cost a little over $6000. Today, I'm running G3.5 smoother and better on my iMac that only costs around $2000. Oh, and as an added bonus, Mac OS comes with all the apps I need to function at work and at home. The ONLY things I use the Windows side of the machine for are G3, FS One, and TiVo Desktop because until next month, TiVo-to-go transfers aren't available in Mac OS. (When we're not flying a sim, we're all watching The Apprentice on our iPod or cell phone, right?) How much does a Windows PC cost these days if you add a legal copy of MS Office, Creative Suite and Internet Security, and equip the hardware the same? I've got a $1500 machine that can do all of that, AND fly G3.5... I won't even get into the built-in webcam (at more than double the resolution of anything on a Windows machine), remote control, WiFi, Bluetooth, and lack of crashes/hangs... that's all standard stuff, right? In politics as in computers, money talks. The idea that a company (or politician) will do something just because a few hundred folks put their names down on paper (or in a forum) has always seemed silly to me. Would I buy a Mac native R/C flight simulator if it was any good... count my vote as a resounding YES. Do I think it's likely to happen no matter how much we yell? Nope. Will I be holding my breath waiting for one? No way! I'll just exist happily with my ONE computer that gives me the best of both worlds... As for the discussion I read earlier (in this thread) about who ripped off whom... ALL of this stuff started on a 6502 processor.... anyone written any 6502 machine code lately? -Case
_____________________________
Alaskan Marine Adventures, LLC Voted "Juneaus Favorite Marine Adventure Tour"
Hide Signatures
|