RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!!  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
More Resources on the
Cap 232G - 27
  • 2 Active Classified Ad(s)
  • See User Ratings
  • Suggest Compatible Equip.
  • Check for Retailers
  • Discussions on this Product


    • All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> 3D Flying! >> RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!!
    Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13]

    Login
    Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thre... - 4/15/2008 2:13:45 AM   
    twistr



    Posts: 467
    Joined: 8/24/2004
    From: Lone Grove, OK, USA
    Status: offline     		The Brison will pull the wings off. Power is phenominal. I did not put any extra weight in mine like smoke etc, tried to keep it as light as possible. I love my Brison!



    quote:

    ORIGINAL: MaxxGS

    Well I finished my Cap 232G build over the winter and I''''m going to fire the new DA-50 engine this week. The weather has not been the best and spring is taking its time getting here this year.

    twistr
    How is the performance with the Brison 3.2. I really like the Brison 3.2 engines and I have a new 3.2 and I almost put it in this plane before buying the DA-50.



    _____________________________

    Fly 'em if ya got 'em !!

    (in reply to MaxxGS)
           Post #: 301

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 4/15/2008 2:26:17 AM   
    polakowa


     

    Posts: 66
    Joined: 11/9/2007
    From: , ON, CANADA
    Status: offline     		Anybody have experience or opinions on the DL50 engine. Pretty close weight to the DA50 and much cheaper. I have heard good things elsewhere? What you guys think. Also would a 22 x 8 prop be the best selection here.
    See link:

    http://www.dlusa.net/

    (in reply to twistr)
           Post #: 302

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 4/15/2008 3:31:45 AM   
    twistr



    Posts: 467
    Joined: 8/24/2004
    From: Lone Grove, OK, USA
    Status: offline     		In my short r/c career, what little gassers I''ve been exposed to, Brison and DA are the best. But that Evolution gasser is coming in very good as well.

    The DA50 will be an excellent motor and will give you plenty of power and years of good service. There''s a couple flying in my club.



    quote:

    ORIGINAL: polakowa

    Anybody have experience or opinions on the DL50 engine. Pretty close weight to the DA50 and much cheaper. I have heard good things elsewhere? What you guys think. Also would a 22 x 8 prop be the best selection here.
    See link:

    http://www.dlusa.net/



    _____________________________

    Fly 'em if ya got 'em !!

    (in reply to polakowa)
           Post #: 303

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 4/15/2008 3:48:04 AM   
    chuck l


     

    Posts: 869
    Joined: 11/21/2002
    From: Stacy, MN, USA
    Status: offline     		The DL50 has been working out great for a lot of people, myself included. I have two of them, one of which is on the Cap. Power is not an issue. Service and support out of Bob at DLUSA is excellent. Below is a link to the second thread on the DL50, the first one got shut down after 100 pages because one person wouldn''t stop being political. I''m running both a ProZinger and a Xoar 22x8 props. I''m considering trying a 23x6 prop for 3D.

    Chuck

    http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6493058/tm.htm

    (in reply to twistr)
           Post #: 304

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 4/25/2008 4:54:23 AM   
    LLD


     

    Posts: 131
    Joined: 10/28/2002
    From: Santa Claus, IN, USA
    Status: offline     		Well it's been awhile since I posted on this thread, about a year. It's been sitting on the bench that long, but I'm moving on it again. Going to try to bring it in under 15.5 lbs w/ a DA 50. I should make it pretty easy. If I'm not off too much on my weights and don't use too much epoxy I should be good. It should be closer to about 15.25 lbs. I will be flying IMAC with it this year. Hope to have it ready in a couple of weeks.

    I've read this thread a number of times and thank all that has posted...

    LLD

    < Message edited by LLD -- 4/25/2008 4:55:50 AM >

    (in reply to chuck l)
           Post #: 305

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 4/25/2008 5:38:00 AM   
    smokedat


     

    Posts: 17
    Joined: 3/29/2007
    From: santa paula, CA, USA
    Status: offline     		I have some acessories from this plane up for sale. real cheap there just taking up space.i have the alum gear and carbon gear. i also have the rear stabs, and both wings, one has tip damage. its repairable. I was trying to do a harrier landing droped in to fast and broke the fuse, didnt want to bother repearing it so i junked this one and got a Dietrich Extra 260. any one interested or need pics PM me r1champ805@verizon.net

    (in reply to LLD)
           Post #: 306

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/5/2008 7:23:44 AM   
    polakowa


     

    Posts: 66
    Joined: 11/9/2007
    From: , ON, CANADA
    Status: offline     		Hey people,

    Can anyone explain to me what the instructions are trying to indicate in regards to mounting the cowl. It mentions scres and tube and for some reason the holes on the fuselage where never drilled completely for the cowl to mount. Is ther esupposed to be a blind nut there?

    (in reply to smokedat)
           Post #: 307

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/14/2008 7:40:05 PM   
    chuck l


     

    Posts: 869
    Joined: 11/21/2002
    From: Stacy, MN, USA
    Status: offline     		I have a checking question on balancing the 232g. I've been flying the plane with the cg set at the middle of the recommended range, and she is just too squirely. I'm moving the cg to the front of the recommended range as suggested in early posts and the review. It needs 7oz of weight on the engine box to balance and I'm wondering if anyone else has needed that much weight. DL50 with a Bison wrap around muffler, one A123 battery for ignition/Rx mounted on the firewall, and nothing else different.

    (in reply to polakowa)
           Post #: 308

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/15/2008 12:30:07 AM   
    LLD


     

    Posts: 131
    Joined: 10/28/2002
    From: Santa Claus, IN, USA
    Status: offline     		Where did you mount the Rudder Servo? In the tail or did you go Pull/Pull from the back of the canopy area?

    LLD

    < Message edited by LLD -- 5/15/2008 2:05:13 AM >

    (in reply to chuck l)
           Post #: 309

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/15/2008 2:19:37 AM   
    chuck l


     

    Posts: 869
    Joined: 11/21/2002
    From: Stacy, MN, USA
    Status: offline     		I used pull/pull on the rudder with the servo under the canopy.

    (in reply to LLD)
           Post #: 310

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/15/2008 2:43:07 AM   
    LLD


     

    Posts: 131
    Joined: 10/28/2002
    From: Santa Claus, IN, USA
    Status: offline     		I hate adding weight...If you are using the stock tail wheel remove it and replace it with a weight of 1 ounces...I am using a "RC Blimp Titanium Tail Wheel Assembly" which is 30 grams. The stock tail wheel is weak (reading the threads) and weighs 45 grams. I'm saving 15 grams on the tail for this. I also used H9 titanium pushrods for the elevators with a savings of 5 grams. It doesn't seem like a lot. But when you start adding this up it just under 3/4 ounces in the tail. The total difference of adding weight to the nose or reducing weight in the tail is 7.71 ounces, almost a 1/2 pound.

    I'm not far enough to get a CG balance yet. But a .71 ounce savings that far back is a lot compared to adding weight up front.

    I would be curious on how it balances out. Hopefully giving you the actual weights from my parts can help you make the decision before committing $50 for the weight savings...

    Another big place to save weight is your elevator servo selection. Don't sacrifice servo torque for weight savings though...

    Hope this helps...

    LLD

    ***Edited to correct the first line from, "...and replace it with a weight of 3/4 ounce..." with "and replace it with a weight of 1 ounce...". This should represent the actual weight on the tail if replacing with the part I'm using...Sorry for the confusion...

    < Message edited by LLD -- 5/15/2008 2:54:53 AM >

    (in reply to chuck l)
           Post #: 311

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/15/2008 3:20:48 AM   
    LLD


     

    Posts: 131
    Joined: 10/28/2002
    From: Santa Claus, IN, USA
    Status: offline     		I measured the distance from the forward CG to the tail which was close to 1200mm to the the tail wheel. 6-1/8 inch (forward CG) is about the center of the wing tube and approx 250mm to the front of the fire wall. If my math is correct:

    1200/250=4.8 leverage factor

    4.8 x .71 = 3.4 ounces of weight in the nose you should save by reducing the tail .71 ounces.

    I think this is correct, but I would prove it on a balance stand...

    LLD

    (in reply to LLD)
           Post #: 312

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/16/2008 1:23:39 AM   
    chuck l


     

    Posts: 869
    Joined: 11/21/2002
    From: Stacy, MN, USA
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: chuck l

    I have a checking question on balancing the 232g. I've been flying the plane with the cg set at the middle of the recommended range, and she is just too squirely. I'm moving the cg to the front of the recommended range as suggested in early posts and the review. It needs 7oz of weight on the engine box to balance and I'm wondering if anyone else has needed that much weight. DL50 with a Bison wrap around muffler, one A123 battery for ignition/Rx mounted on the firewall, and nothing else different.



    Ok, I was wrong! I made a 7oz weight and went to attach it to the motor box. Turns out the ignition/Rx battery is mounted to the back side of the wing tube, not on the firewall as stated earlier. Anyway, I decided to go ahead and mount the 7oz weight and if the handling is better, I'll move the ignition/Rx battery on to the firewall and shed most of the 7oz.

    (in reply to chuck l)
           Post #: 313

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thr... - 5/16/2008 5:57:17 PM   
    chuck l


     

    Posts: 869
    Joined: 11/21/2002
    From: Stacy, MN, USA
    Status: offline     		Well the plane definitely flies better with the cg at the forward location listed the manual, so I will have to go back in move the ignition battery to the firewall and remove the 7oz weight. I'll do that at the same time I repair the landing gear which ripped off much to my shock. The plane landed real nice and smooth, no bounce, and was almost stopped, then the landing gear ripped off. S..t! You guys might want to check the glue joints around your landing gear. It wont' take long to fix, but I will need a new prop.

    (in reply to chuck l)
           Post #: 314