RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!!  
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Tower Hobbies
Enter up to 4 keywords or Tower stock numbers
Logged in as Guest



Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
More Resources on the
Cap 232G - 27
  • 1 Active Classified Ad(s)
  • See User Ratings
  • Suggest Compatible Equip.
  • Check for Retailers
  • Discussions on this Product


    • All Forums >> RC Airplanes >> 3D Flying! >> RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!!
    Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11   next >   >>  

    Login
    Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/20/2006 5:41:09 PM   
    pettit



    Posts: 2138
    Joined: 12/19/2001
    From: Durham, NC, USA
    Status: offline     		The front page of the instruction manual says 15 - 16 pounds.



    _____________________________

    Dick Pettit
    Associate Editor, R/C REPORT Magazine
    "You Can Buy Better,
    But You Can't Pay More"

    (in reply to Railinrob)
           Post #: 76

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/20/2006 11:51:45 PM   
    bodywerks



    Posts: 3110
    Joined: 12/10/2004
    From: Tucson, AZ, USA
    Status: offline     		So that's 3 different advertised weight ranges!! At least it seems that they are coming in at the lower range of the three...I see 14 pounds doable from a weight freak like me!

    _____________________________

    STRAIGHTEN UP AND FLY LIGHT!!!

    (in reply to pettit)
           Post #: 77

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/21/2006 12:15:30 AM   
    marv422


     

    Posts: 51
    Joined: 8/15/2005
    From: oneonta, AL, USA
    Status: offline     		Jon595,

    Your right about the ign. wire. Actually the spiral wrap for the wire is just off camera to the right on a work bench. Thanks for the reminder though, I had about forgotten to put it on. Should maiden this bird this weekend weather permitting.

    Marvin

    _____________________________

    "It flew all the way to the scene of the crash"

    (in reply to jon595)
           Post #: 78

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/21/2006 12:47:18 AM   
    exeter_acres



    Posts: 6079
    Joined: 9/22/2004
    From: Johns Creek, GA, USA
    Status: offline     		There is this line:

    quote:

    In the case of the 27% Cap 232G the wing span is 80” and the weight will come in at 13.5 to 15.5 pounds depending of course on the equipment that is installed by the RC modeler.


    Found in this article
    http://www.horizonhobby.com/Articles/Article.aspx?ArticleID=1605

    _____________________________

    I would like to earn your vote for IMAC Southeast Regional Director

    (in reply to marv422)
           Post #: 79

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/21/2006 1:06:15 AM   
    bodywerks



    Posts: 3110
    Joined: 12/10/2004
    From: Tucson, AZ, USA
    Status: offline     		Yeah, that was one of the 3 weight claims I saw. anything under 15 pounds would be ideal.

    _____________________________

    STRAIGHTEN UP AND FLY LIGHT!!!

    (in reply to exeter_acres)
           Post #: 80

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/21/2006 8:27:49 PM   
    Railinrob


     

    Posts: 181
    Joined: 5/23/2004
    From: seaside, CA, USA
    Status: offline     		Well today I stalled it out of an attempted harrier landing and broke the fuse at the trailing edge and actually bent the wing tube. I'm gonna fix her but I'm really disgusted in myself right now

    Attachments
    Click to see fullsize image.
    Click for fullsize


    < Message edited by Railinrob -- 10/21/2006 11:50:36 PM >

    _____________________________

    I was told I fly my planes like they're free.
    Thats a good thing right?

    (in reply to bodywerks)
           Post #: 81

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/22/2006 2:58:42 AM   
    bodywerks



    Posts: 3110
    Joined: 12/10/2004
    From: Tucson, AZ, USA
    Status: offline     		Sorry to hear that...looks like a fairly easy fix, though. Hey, that's how you learn!!!

    _____________________________

    STRAIGHTEN UP AND FLY LIGHT!!!

    (in reply to Railinrob)
           Post #: 82

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/22/2006 7:29:22 AM   
    FlyguyXII



    Posts: 135
    Joined: 10/30/2004
    From: Belleville, MI, USA
    Status: offline     		sorry to hear that man definatly looks fixable. You should upgrade to the carbon tube while your at it.

    (in reply to bodywerks)
           Post #: 83

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/23/2006 5:05:20 AM   
    Railinrob


     

    Posts: 181
    Joined: 5/23/2004
    From: seaside, CA, USA
    Status: offline     		who did you get that carbon stuff from fly guy ? rebuilding will start tomorrow after work


    _____________________________

    I was told I fly my planes like they're free.
    Thats a good thing right?

    (in reply to FlyguyXII)
           Post #: 84

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/23/2006 6:09:00 AM   
    FlyguyXII



    Posts: 135
    Joined: 10/30/2004
    From: Belleville, MI, USA
    Status: offline     		http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/

    Go to the carbon fiber stuff you will want the 1"x30" carbon tube

    (in reply to Railinrob)
           Post #: 85

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/23/2006 6:40:57 AM   
    Railinrob


     

    Posts: 181
    Joined: 5/23/2004
    From: seaside, CA, USA
    Status: offline     		Cool! thanks a lot

    _____________________________

    I was told I fly my planes like they're free.
    Thats a good thing right?

    (in reply to FlyguyXII)
           Post #: 86

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/25/2006 3:37:06 AM   
    kmw1


     

    Posts: 49
    Joined: 5/9/2006
    From: Chicago, IL, USA
    Status: offline     		FlyguyXII-

    Any weights yet??


    (in reply to Railinrob)
           Post #: 87

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 10/25/2006 5:47:44 AM   
    FlyguyXII



    Posts: 135
    Joined: 10/30/2004
    From: Belleville, MI, USA
    Status: offline     		no sorry Work has been REALLY CRAZZZYY!!!! i havent been able to do anything on it. ill try to see if i can get some work done to get it ready for some weights but im not sure SORRY guys!!

    (in reply to kmw1)
           Post #: 88

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 11/16/2006 6:11:02 PM   
    Railinrob


     

    Posts: 181
    Joined: 5/23/2004
    From: seaside, CA, USA
    Status: offline     		Man, this thread has been dead for a while . I still have not had a chance to fly my repaired cap yet but I did find out that the stock wing tube is not filled with solid wood.It has light ply caps with a "t" stringer that runs from end to end thru a few discs. I cut my old one open and looked inside.

    I will be re-weighing it as our digital scale at work started reading all over the place and was replaced so I have a feeling my earlier weight claim is bogus . I realize there is added wood now for the repair and it will have gained weight but its still a ballpark figure

    < Message edited by Railinrob -- 11/16/2006 6:19:17 PM >

    _____________________________

    I was told I fly my planes like they're free.
    Thats a good thing right?

    (in reply to FlyguyXII)
           Post #: 89

    RE: NEW Hanger9 27% Cap 232G!!!! Build Thread!!! - 11/16/2006 7:20:52 PM   
    ggroyal1


     

    Posts: 261
    Joined: 10/21/2005
    From: Norcross, GA, USA
    Status: offline     		Did you get a carbon fiber tube from troybuilt and did it fit perfect? I have not flown mine yet, but it is about 99%. I had to change the direct rudder to pull-pull for the CG. Tru-turn got the right template for the spinner backplate(evo45gx2), now that fits. I also got the battery setup done. A 4000mah TP receiver lipo with a duralite 6v req. and a 3200mah 7.4v lipo for the ignition. I used the rcats switch for remote ign.

    thanks
    George G. Royal

    (in reply to Railinrob)